News

Supreme Court Guts Fifth Amendment: Silence Now Equals Guilt

supreme court fifth amendment

A police officer is asking you questions about a crime, and because the questions are off the record you answer willingly. Then, the questions take an accusatory tone and you stop answering. The Fifth Amendment, which allows a person not to present criminal evidence against themselves, surely protects you in this moment right?

Wrong.

Amid the slew of decision being churned out by the Supreme Court right now was a ruling in last week’s Salinas v. Texas. Genovevo Salinas had not been arrested, so he felt comfortable answering the police’s questions voluntarily. However, once a question made him uncomfortable he stopped responding. The police used Salinas’ silence in court to signify a confession of guilt.

Salinas then brought suit against the state of Texas based on the fact that a person could not be incriminated for silence, nor could the use of the Fifth Amendment be used as evidence against a person. The question posed in the petition to the Supreme Court reads:

Whether or under what circumstances the Fifth Amendment’s Self-Incrimination Clause protects a defendant’s refusal to answer law enforcement questioning before he has been arrested or read his Miranda rights.

The Supreme Court ruled against Salinas in a 5-4 vote because they claimed that Salinas did not make clear during questioning that he was utilizing the Fifth Amendment. In the words of scotusblog:

The prosecution’s use of his silence in response to another question as evidence of his guilt at trial did not violate the Fifth Amendment because petitioner failed to expressly invoke his privilege not to incriminate himself in response to the officer’s question.

Supreme Court: ‘Racist’ Areas Can Now Make Their Own Voting Laws

Now historically racist areas in the United States will not have to seek approval from the Justice Department before enacting new voting laws.

Click here to read more

supreme court decisions

Along with the other Constitutional amendments being chipped away at lately; the First, the Second, the Fourth, the Sixth, the Eighth and the Fifteenth, we can officially add the Fifth Amendment to that list.

Warn Your Friends!

Share Tweet Share Email

If you find yourself in a situation where you want to use the Fifth Amendment, make sure you express that as plainly as you can, otherwise your unwillingness to answer questions could get you locked up for a long, long time.

You can read the full petition to the Supreme Court here:

It Is Now Illegal to Annoy New York Police Officers

Yesterday the New York State Senate passed Bill S.2402. If it makes it through the State Assembly it will be a felony to "harass" or "annoy" police officers in the state of New York.

Click here to read more

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 743 other followers