News

Shawn Lucas: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Shawn Lucas

A screenshot of Shawn Lucas serving the DNC with the fraud lawsuit. (YouTube/Ricardo Villalba)

Conspiracy theories surround the sudden August death of a man who helped serve the Democratic National Committee with a lawsuit alleging fraud in the presidential race.

Shawn Lucas died on Aug. 2, 2016, confirmed the Washington D.C. medical examiner, but the circumstances of his death remained very foggy until November 1.

According to the Office of Chief Medical Examiner of Washington D.C., this is the cause and manner of Shawn Lucas’ death. The office released the information to Heavy on November 1:

Cause: Combined adverse effects of fentanyl, cyclobenzaprine, and mitragynine
Manner: Accident

Lucas, 38, is the latest Washington D.C. man who died young to inspire DNC-related conspiracy theories. Conspiracy theories also surround the July murder of Seth Rich, a DNC data analyst who worked on voting rights issues and who was gunned down in an unsolved slaying on a Washington D.C. street.

In contrast to Rich, there was no public evidence that Lucas died suspiciously, however.

Here’s what you need to know:


1. Lucas Is Seen in a Video That Shows Him Serving The DNC With Papers in The Fraud Lawsuit

The lawsuit was filed on June 28 by Bernie Sanders supporters against the DNC and then DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who resigned in the wake of the WikiLeaks email scandal.

The lawsuit filed by “a group made up predominantly of Bernie Sanders supporters” alleges Wasserman Schultz “rigged the primary for Hillary Clinton,” says UPI.

The group of 120 people says in the lawsuit “that Wasserman Schultz and the DNC were fraudulent, negligent and misrepresented their true motivations in the Democratic presidential primary,” said UPI, adding that internal email and memos were cited in the lawsuit.

Snopes says Lucas was just one of the process servers in the DNC lawsuit.

WikiLeaks List: Most Damaging Emails About DNC, Clinton, & Bernie

We've compiled an extensive look at the most damaging or insightful emails about Clinton and Sanders, from the WikiLeaks emails. See the best of the leaks here.

Click here to read more

2. Lucas Was Found Dead in a Bathroom

Fueling rumors, authorities did not say how Lucas died until November 1.

Asked whether the death was being investigated as suspicious in any manner, the Washington D.C. Police Department’s media office would only provide Heavy with a one-page incident report that says Lucas was found unconscious in a bathroom at home by his girlfriend, Savannah King (see above).

The D.C. medical examiner’s office, by law, does not release more information to the public beyond cause of death.

Read more about Lucas’ cause of death here:

DNC Process Server Shawn Lucas Cause of Death Released

The death of DNC process server Shawn Lucas has been ruled an accident because of ingestion of substances including Fentanyl and a component found in Kratom.

Click here to read more

3. A Fundraising Site Was Set Up After Lucas’ Death in His Honor

Shawn Lucas

The Go Fund Me site created by a friend confirms that Lucas died on Aug. 2. It says, “The world lost an incredible man who made everyone around him better. On August 2nd, 2016 Shawn Lucas was unexpectedly taken from us. He was a brother, a son, a friend, a best friend, a beautiful heart.…Trying to describe him in words is a difficult task, because he was so many things to so many people.”

The site said that Shawn “wasn’t like anyone you would ever meet or forget. He was someone you remember after only meeting once, someone who you want to have with you at every occasion because he just made it better. He brought light to every room, every situation, and always had a handful of witty comments no-one else could say more perfectly or think of on the spot and have ready at the tip of his tongue. Everyone has their own connection and closeness to Shawn, he was a friend to the universe and such a joy to be around. The sense of loss and thought of him not being here is overwhelmingly painful. It cuts the DC city deep.”

Heavy has written to the site’s creator seeking more information on Lucas’ death.

The site says that Shawn Lucas is survived by his loving partner Savannah King, his brother Justin Lucas, his father William Lucas, and his mother Susan Lucas.

Shawn’s brother also wrote on the fundraising site. “You may know him as Astro or MCSL, but to me, he was the coolest damn brother to walk the earth! He always followed his heart and lived life on the edge. When he was 18 he wanted to go snowboarding, so he moved to Colorado. When he was 28, he wanted to learn Jiu Jitsu, so he went to Brazil for three months (three separate times).”

The brother continued, “He wanted to create music, so he wrote and produced two hip hop albums. If you had the pleasure of meeting him, there is no doubt he had an impact on your life. He helped raise me and I wouldn’t be who I am or where I am without him. The world just lost a bad ass mo fo and I just lost my big brother. RIP Shawn. I miss you.”


4. Lucas’ Name Was Mentioned in a July Motion The DNC Filed in The Fraud Cause

Shawn Lucas

A screenshot of Lucas serving the DNC with the fraud lawsuit. (YouTube/Ricardo Villalba)

Lucas’ name comes up in the motion the DNC filed in July in the fraud lawsuit.

It says, in part, “On July 6, 2016, Plaintiffs filed affidavits of service of process, in which Shawn Lucas and Brandon Yoshimura of One Source Process, Inc. claim to have served Rebecca Christopher (described by the affidavits as a ‘Creative Strategist’) with process for both the DNC and its chair at 1:30 p.m. on July 1st…”

The motion continued, “In fact, the person with whom Mr. Lucas and Mr. Yoshimura interacted was not Ms. Christopher, but a different DNC employee named Rebecca Herries…Ms. Herries came to the lobby to meet Mr. Lucas and Mr. Yoshimura after she was repeatedly advised by security that Mr. Lucas and Mr. Yoshimura were refusing to leave unless they could hand some legal papers to a DNC staffer.”


5. Lucas’ Name Is Mentioned By Conspiracy Theorists in Connection With The Murder of DNC Analyst Seth Rich

Seth Rich, DNC

DNC staffer, Seth Rich, in his DNC profile picture. (LinkedIn/Seth Rich)

Rich was a data analyst for the DNC, who was found murdered in early July when he was gunned down on a Washington D.C. street. The murder remains unsolved.

Conspiracy theorists have floated the theory that Rich could have been behind the WikiLeaks’ document dump. Although WikiLeaks won’t release its source, WikiLeaks did offer on Aug. 9. a $20,000 reward for information leading to a conviction in the Rich case.

However, WikiLeaks’ founder Julian Assange gave cryptic comments about Rich to Dutch television on Aug. 8, in which he would not confirm or deny whether Rich was a WikiLeaks’ source (as standard practice, though, WikiLeaks does not discuss its sources).

Although conspiracy theorists are trying to link Lucas’ death with that of Rich (and others), they offer no evidence to back up their contention that foul play was involved in Lucas’ case or that Hillary Clinton was in any way tied to it. U.S. officials and data experts have said they think Russian intelligence agents might be behind the email leak by WikiLeaks, which denies ties to the Russians.

Seth Rich: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Seth Rich was a DNC data analyst who was murdered in Washington D.C. Conspiracy theories are raging. What really happened to him?

Click here to read more

WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange Discusses Seth Rich, Sources & the DNC

WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange spoke to Dutch television about murdered Democratic National Committee analyst Seth Rich. Here is what he said about Rich, sources, leaks, and the DNC.

Click here to read more

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

41 comments

  1. FOR YOUR EDIFICATION: monika Lewinski giving bill Clinton a blow job in the oval office was a right wing conspiracy according to Hillary Clinton…when there’s evidence…there’s no conspiracy…

    • OMG and YOU believe Hillary.??? Monica admitted there was a blow job AND those cigars he liked to smoke so often…. He used them as a dildo on her.. I live this shit. I know it happened. HILLARY IS A DAMN LIAR AS WELL AS BILL CLINTON. HE WAS CALLED UP BYTHE ETHICS COMMITTEE, FOR UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR. HE’S A DAMN NEAR GOT IMPEACHED AT THTA TIME AS WELL. SO YOU CAN PUT YOUR LITTLE BULLSHIT “CONSPIRACY ACCORDING TO HILLARY CLINTON” “where’s the evidence… there’s no conspiracy” bullshit to bed. OK… He had affairs in the oval office, OUR HOUSE, the people’s house. He’s a creep of the largest proportion.

      • Cheryl, you should learn to understand what you read. He says Hillary claims it was a conspiracy. He then states that when there isevidence, that there is no conspiracy. By this he means there is proof it happened, everyone knows it happened, so by Hillary claiming it was a right wing conspiracy, she is further proved a liar and untrustworthy.

      • WTH are you two talking about? I read the article above and your comments have nothing to do with Bill Clinton and his consensual affair with Monica. Show me your proof and facts – that Hillary Clinton – still believes her Husband and Monica consensual affair was a right wing conspiracy. Yes I want to see it – I watched the entire outcome and believe me Hillary knows it was real and factual – she called out her husband and the Monica – whereas Monica actually thought he would divorce his wife for her – as do many a mistress (Slut). When wives chose to keep their marriage together with a multiple cheater – its none of our business. Wow, what do you think about Mr Trump – he has been married 3 times.. and cheated multiple times on his at least two wives – even divorced one and married his lover who one of his children is by her – talk about a male and female slut’s, they all are… serial adultery !! However, Hillary Clinton has not committed Adultry/cheated, she has had one child with one husband for over 45 years of her Marriage with the same man, she has been faithful. The only thing she may have done wrong – in ALL this- is… in getting angry and hurt… she verbally called out his slut’s – that’s it… And I do know one thing, you may have not heard HIllary Call out Bill Clinton – but behind close door’s is when wives call out their cheating husbands!!! But it is well known, that there is groupies.. that hang and slut with famous band members after the gig, there are groupies who target OLD RICH (lucky is the guy that’s not rich but only looks that way hahaha) These young woman want to be sugar babies… with rich old men. Monica and those like her.. are not innocent and deserve to be called out. Married men, rich or not, are off limits… When I was young, I had a built in.. that older men were fathers and grandfathers age – was un-natural and quite frankly gross to even think of being sexual with them. So, the Moral of these consensual relationships… is no ones business except them, and the wives. I know several wives who keep their families together with their serial cheater – its not for me but,hey if they can live happily ever after… who am I to say. Although my husband would not have been unscathed – behind close doors – the women being called names by a hurt and angered wife – would have been least of their worries if it were me – they got off too easy – I would have sold those sluts off to the tabloids.

        • Me thinks Lulu protest a bit too much….wow, sorry for your husband when you caught him cheating on you. Yikes- “sluts”, “groupies”? Obviously you haven’t read much over the last 23 years; with modern day tech, it doesn’t take more than a few moments to have massive amounts of data in regards to the Clinton’s and their nefarious dealings. I will admit that there hasn’t been any convictions directly against them, but there was an impeachment on two counts against good Ole Billy Boy. Just how unlucky do you have to be to have so much negative data on one couple? Even the Democratic tinfoil hat gang can’t just brush this away with it’s a Republican conspiracy/witch hunt.

          Have a better life Lulu, we’ll all be better off.

          “Don’t believe everything you read on the internet”
          Abraham Lincoln- 1867

        • Listen up dummy! Bill Clinton was the president! The most powerful man in the world. Monica was an intern! A young and vividly ignorant fool. Bill Clinton took advantage of that girl. On top of that, it is our business because it happened in the Oval Office! That is the people’s office! That is where the nations business takes place and Bill Clinton was her boss! They were at work! If your boss conducts himself at work the way Bill Clinton did he would be fired or sued for sexual harassment. The White House has a residence portion and Bill had done his dirty deed there then it wouldn’t be our business. But he didn’t, he did it in the office where Lincoln sat, where Reagan sat. He was a pervert and a disgusting child that lied to a federal judge and was impeached and we are all living in the world his lies created.

          • Reagan relaxed the arms embargo on Saddam Hussein, and started a Sunni terrorist army with a Saudi trust funder.
            He screwed America for worse than Clinton did…

        • you will never get a response when you ask for actual evidence from these poor, pathetic, brainwashed creeps. their whole premise is based on lie on top of lie on top of lie. these insignificant little critters wouldn’t recognize truth if it bit them in the butt…..just keep on regurgitating more koch puke with nothing behind it but the stench.

        • Actually Cheryl, Bill Clinton WAS Impeached (charged) by the House of Representatives… but he wasn’t convicted in the Senate. I think you meant to say he, “Damn near got convicted”.

        • Lulu,… You say it was a “consensual affair” but the law looks at it differently when the relationship is between an employee and her boss or a student and a teacher because the superior has power over the other and can apply undue pressure. I’m not saying that Bill pressured Monica into it, but any man who had any self-respect would have realized she was just living out an immature fantasy with him and would not have had anything to do with her. If your husband had a “consensual affair” with someone who worked under him (figuratively), he would be fired (and divorced) for it – as Bill should have been.

          As to whether it makes any difference whether Bill had his affair(s) in the oval office or in the residence… it’s really irrelevant. The key point to ask yourself is, “How can anyone trust a man who would break his solemn vow to be faithful to his wife? If he would cheat on the most important person in his life, how can any of us hope that he would be honest with us or treat us any better? Who a man chooses to sleep with is a reflection of his internal self-worth. Any man who sleeps with prostitutes and says it doesn’t matter is a liar and a self-deluded fool. The truth is that he sees himself as no better than the prostitutes or he’d have chosen a higher level of woman to express his self-worth with.

          What’s this got to do with Hillary? Any woman who would defend Bill – his wife especially – is getting something out of it. Hillary got to be FLOTUS and got a springboard for her own career off Bill’s coattails. Again, she must count herself (know herself to be) very unworthy if she needed to use a lying, cheating, scoundrel like Bill to advance her own cause.

          Furthermore, I can’t believe you’re calling Monica a slut… Blame the woman??? That’s so un-PC these days… but it reveals how you and most other liberals have such double standards. If Bill had been a Republican president (or merely anti-abortion), you’d be accusing him of the worst crimes imaginable and defending Monica for having been ‘raped’ by him. Like Hillary, you are riding Bill’s deeply flawed coattails because you too get something out of it – preserving your claim to be a victim in life. No, I don’t know you, but if I met you, I’m sure I’d have a higher opinion of you than you have of yourself because I’d expect you to be more capable of living life free of scum like the Clintons than you seem to think you are.

        • I heard ole Hill was was hooking up with her right hand, cell phone toting woman
          How in the Hell would you know if Hillary has been faithful to bad Billy Boy. Maybe all yhe dead peoe in her wake are her lovers. Black widow…..Im sure of it!😉😅😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

        • So when an older man goes after a younger woman she is the ‘slut’….have you ever seen the interview Monica did in 1999 or 2000, cause after watching it no longer thought it was a joke as you have bill clinton lying about everything, even under oath and left this woman to get attacked over and over publically and legally to the point of being suicidal. Someone should take those cigars and shove them in Bill Clinton and then see if he enjoys that also.

  2. “U.S. officials and data experts have said they think Russian intelligence agents might be behind the email leak by WikiLeaks, which denies ties to the Russians.”

    Yes, there is no linking evidence to Hellary yet, but Puhleease spare the “official sources” lies.

  3. I have to say that this sentence is mighty peculiar: “Although conspiracy theorists are trying to link Lucas’ death with that of Rich (and others), they offer no evidence to back up their contention that foul play was involved in Lucas’ case or that Hillary Clinton was in any way tied to it.”, given that your first sentence, “Rich was a data analyst for the DNC, who was found murdered in early July when he was gunned down on a Washington D.C. street.” seems to clearly indicate that “foul play was involved”.

    • Cyrano: Read a little closer man: the sentence says in the LUCAS case, there has not been evidence of foul play released yet. You are conflating the two sentences (Rich case with Lucas case).

      • That’s ridiculous. I saw a 22 year old man die. He collapsed and no body had any reason to believe he was unhealthy. By appearance he was in perfect health. He had a heart problem that had not been detected. It was a genetic anomaly that if not looked for is never seen. People die of undetected natural causes at any age. The guy had just been accepted into the Ohio State Medicine program. We were students at a Christian private college. The guy just fell over dead while standing outside of the sanctuary. A female basketball coach died at age 64. She looked to be in better shape than most 20 year olds. She just collapsed. People of all ages die of natural causes. But some people would rather believe in ridiculous conspiracy theories.

        • It’s the timing Patrick. When people around the Clinton’s drop dead at the very moment of putting out damaging information against the Clinton’s it’s suspicious. Brett Breitbart dropped dead is less than 12 hours before his press very damaging Obama news(that news never surfaced). I watched a 19 year old athlete going in for a layup drop dead on the spot. It does happen but Only once in in my lifetime. If you follow the Clinton’s, every time there is trouble, people who are a threat start dying. You may be right but it should be investigated.

  4. United States Intelligence Chief James Clapper has unequivocally denied that there was any evidence that the Russians were behind the hacking of the DNC E-mails. By repeating the Clintonesque.Rhodesesque propaganda when it has so clearly been disavowed by Mr. Clapper — this journalist has shown herself to be grossly negligent – or more likely a puppet of the establishment. Please recall this hugely significant misrepresentation as you read her future articles.

    • I’ve read at least one theory (and it’s just an interesting, but unproven theory, that our own NSA was so furious at Hillary for having kept a private email server in her home – one that likely got some of their agents and sources killed – that they (the NSA) leaked the DNC’s emails as a way of undermining the possibility she could be elected president over them.

  5. There are no proofs, just a series of eerie coincidences (btw, where are the proofs of Russian involvement? There must be proofs, otherwise it’s just another conspiracy theory).

  6. I just don’t understand why you call people who believe that it is suspicious of these deaths, conspiracy theorists. I did some research and when people try to stop people from thinking a situation is true they use the term “conspiracy theorists”.. With all the deaths around the Clintons you don’t have any doubt?

    • Dd…..my thoughts exactly!. Lots of dead people who were once involved with those lying, cheating, no good Clintons! Especially ones that were around them during their many, many, manymanymany scandals.

  7. Seriously people as human beings we are given something called instinct and if don’t have any inclination that the Clintons hands are not dirty you need to look at how truthful you are to self …

    • Washington D.C. Coroner has stated that it is against the law in D.C. to release their reports to the public. Whether the case is still under investigation or not, regardless of how hard you stomp your feet, scream, cry and pull out your hair.
      I think this is a good law. I am sick of media acting like the judge, jury, etc. If there is cause, the info. will be turned over to a grand jury, etc. —– As it should be. They learned there lesson with the Vince Foster debaucle.
      Get a life, pipe down so the grown ups can talk.

      • Very well said. People will believe anything they read if it fits with how they already feel. If it doesn’t fit they will deny it to the end. If these same conspiracy theories were being said about a candidate they supported they’d be calling it conspiracy theories too. They don’t care about having proof. They only care about their own opinions. Nobody knows how to think critically anymore.

      • The public is not conducting a trial, so they can’t act “like the judge, jury, etc.”; the public will only form individual opinions, not a verdict. The case can be tried in a court and evaluated by the public at the same time. It often is, and it is not wrong for the public to form opinions.

      • BS write: “They learned there lesson with the Vince Foster debaucle”
        Well then, ‘their’ you go… “the VF debaucle”
        That explain more about you, BS, than it does about anything else.