Rachel Crooks: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Rachel Crooks

Rachel Crooks. (LinkedIn)

Rachel Crooks, one of the two women who have accused Donald Trump of unwanted physical contact in The New York Times, is coordinator of international student services at a university in Ohio.

She is also a supporter of Hillary Clinton, says The Times.

The Trump campaign issued a strongly worded denial on October 12 after the article’s publication, calling it “fiction,” and Trump himself personally denied the allegations to the newspaper. Neither woman reported the allegations to authorities, although they confided in others close to them, says The Times.

The allegations come just weeks before the election and as Trump attempts to regain lost momentum following the exposure of the Billy Bush tapes, which captured Trump saying, “I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything…Grab ’em by the p***y. You can do anything.”

During the second presidential debate, Trump denied that he had ever touched women without their consent, and he attempted to shift attention to the pattern of women who have accused former President Bill Clinton of sexual assault.

Here’s what you need to know:

1. Crooks Has Worked in Various Capacities for Ohio Universities

rachel crooks

Rachel Crooks. (Bowling Green University)

The Times says that Crooks was a 22-year-old receptionist in 2005 working for The Bayrock Group, “a real estate investment and development company in Trump Tower” when the alleged incident occurred. The Times alleges that Crooks says she introduced herself to Trump outside an elevator, and Trump kissed her “directly on the mouth,” which she considers “so inappropriate.”

According to Crooks’ LinkedIn page, she was an “Office Assistant” for Bayrock Group, LLC “from June 2005 – June 2006.” It’s listed as her first job on her LinkedIn page.

Crooks is presently Coordinator of International Student Services at Bowling Green State University, in Bowling Green, Ohio, a position she has held since August 2016. Before that time, she worked in various capacities at Tiffin University in Ohio.

She was director of International Student Services for 5 years and one month, assistant director of International Enrollment Management for nine months, director of Transfer and Adult Students for four months, Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions for three years and two months, and Graduate Admissions Representative for 1 year and 2 months.

At Tiffin, she was involved in organizing an international dinner focused on the Chinese year of the dragon. She was quoted by the university website as saying, “The value of the International Dinner cannot be overstated. This is our chance as a University to share the cultures of our diverse international student body with members of the TU family and the greater Tiffin community.”

rachel crooks

Crooks is second from left in the back row. (Facebook)

Tiffin University described her role by saying, “Ms. Crooks advises international students on their F-1 visa regulations, as well as develops programming to promote cultural exchange opportunities on the Tiffin campus. Ms. Crooks also serves as the U.S. liaison for Tiffin University campuses located in Bucharest, Romania, Taipei, Taiwan, and Prague, Czech Republic.”

2. Crooks Is a Campaign Donor & Supporter of Hillary Clinton & Likes a Site on Facebook Called ‘Liberals in America’

COLUMBUS, OH - OCTOBER 10: Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton arrives at Ohio State University on October 10, 2016 in Columbus, Ohio. A day after the second presidential debate in St. Louis, Hillary Clinton is campaigning in Michigan and Ohio. (Photo by Maddie McGarvey/Getty Images)

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton arrives at Ohio State University on October 10, 2016 in Columbus, Ohio. (Getty)

The New York Times says Crooks (and Jessica Leeds, the second accuser in the story) both “support Hillary Clinton’s campaign for president, and Ms. Crooks has made contributions of less than $200 to President Obama and Mrs. Clinton.”

The information comes in the 48th paragraph of a 50-paragraph story.

Trump’s statement responding to the Times article included this paragraph, “Further, the Times story buries the pro-Clinton financial and social media activity on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, reinforcing that this truly is nothing more than a political attack. This is a sad day for the Times.”

It was not immediately clear which social media activity the Trump statement was referring to; a Twitter page for a Rachel Crooks from Ohio has privatized its Tweets (the site is followed by Brianne Webb, who was named in the Times as Crooks’ sister. The article says Crooks had allegedly confided in Webb about the Trump incident). The Google cache from that Twitter page does have some political Tweets, but you can’t read the full content because of the privatization. Examples:



On Facebook, Crooks has liked a site called Liberals in America. Its cover picture is a photo of Barack Obama with the phrase, “Being a Liberal Doesn’t Make You Intelligent. It Is Being Intelligent That Makes You a Liberal.” A sample post from that site:


The site contains harsh criticism of Donald Trump. Crooks’ own posts on her page are not public.


Her other likes include the documentary Godless, which is a film about being an atheist, and The Late Show With Stephen Colbert.


Her Facebook page says she is in a relationship.

3. Crooks Is a Former Scholar/Athlete & Trump’s Campaign Strongly Denies Crooks’ Story

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump arrives for a rally at the Southeastern Livestock Pavilion in Ocala, Florida on October 12, 2016. / AFP / MANDEL NGAN (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump arrives for a rally at the Southeastern Livestock Pavilion in Ocala, Florida on October 12, 2016. (Getty)

Crooks has a master’s degree in the Humanities from Tiffin University, as well as a bachelor of arts in Law and Society, and also lists hospitality management for Syracuse University under education, according to her LinkedIn page. At Syracuse, she was a member of the Varsity Volleyball team and a scholar/athlete. She graduated from Clyde High School.

The News Messenger reports that “She was a volleyball and basketball star at Clyde High School, named to the first-team All-Ohio in both sports. She received a full athletic scholarship to play volleyball at Syracuse University.”

CNN says that Crooks reached out to the Times after reading another story on Trump and adds that campaign sources say the Trump campaign is drafting a lawsuit against the Times and Palm Beach Post, which posted another woman’s account.

The Trump campaign has fired back with an adamant denial of the two accounts in the Times. The statement says:

This entire article is fiction, and for the New York Times to launch a completely false, coordinated character assassination against Mr. Trump on a topic like this is dangerous. To reach back decades in an attempt to smear Mr. Trump trivializes sexual assault, and it sets a new low for where the media is willing to go in its efforts to determine this election.

It is absurd to think that one of the most recognizable business leaders on the planet with a strong record of empowering women in his companies would do the things alleged in this story, and for this to only become public decades later in the final month of a campaign for president should say it all.

Hillary’s communications director released a statement saying, “This disturbing story sadly fits everything we know about the way Donald Trump has treated women. These reports suggest that he lied on the debate stage and that the disgusting behavior he bragged about in the tape are more than just words.”

The Times claimed that Trump himself shouted that “none of this ever took place” to the Times and called the reporter a “disgusting human being.”

Donald Trump Campaign Response to Report That He Sexually Assaulted Two Women

The Donald Trump campaign has responded to a New York Times report that the Republican candidate sexually assaulted two women, Jessica Leeds and Rachel Crooks.

Click here to read more

4. Two Other Women Also Accused Trump of Unwanted Contact

Crooks’ account is accompanied by the story of Jessica Leeds, who also accuses Trump of unwanted contact in the Times’ article, which the Trump campaign and Trump also adamantly deny.

According to The New York Times, Leeds contends that she encountered Trump on an airplane more than three decades ago, when she was a traveling businesswoman, and he lifted her armrest up and began to grab her without her consent. They did not know each other before this, says the Times.

The Associated Press says, “A few hours later, the Palm Beach Post reported that a third woman (Mindy McGillivray) said Trump groped her rear end at his Mar-a-Lago resort.”

Jessica Leeds: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Jessica Leeds has come out saying that Donald Trump inappropriately touched her over 35 years ago.

Click here to read more

5. Trump Has Brought Sexual Assault Allegations Against Former President Bill Clinton Into the Campaign

juanita broaddrick, bill clinton

Bill Clinton and Juanita Broaddrick in the 1970s. (Getty)

Trump has made sexual assault allegations a centerpiece of his recent attacks against Hillary Clinton, as the news media has endlessly excoriated him for the Billy Bush tapes.

Before the second presidential debate, he appeared in an extraordinary news conference with three women who have accused former President Bill Clinton of unwanted sexual contact or attempted sexual contact: Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, and Kathleen Willey. Also at the table: Kathy Shelton, who was 12-years-old when Hillary Clinton, as a young lawyer, represented the man accused of sexually assaulting Shelton.

Broaddrick accuses Hillary of trying to silence her in the wake of her allegations that Bill Clinton raped her in 1978 when he was the attorney general of Arkansas. Neither Broaddrick nor Willey reported their stories to authorities at the time but; as with Crooks (according to the Times), Broaddrick did tell others the account when it happened.

Bill Clinton ultimately paid $850,000 to settle Jones’ sexual harassment action against him. Bill Clinton has denied the Broaddrick allegations through his lawyer and denies Willey’s account that he allegedly groped her in the Oval Office.

Did Bill Clinton Rape Juanita Broaddrick? Reviewing the Evidence

Juanita Broaddrick has insisted for years that Bill Clinton raped her when he was Arkansas' attorney general. Did he rape Broaddrick? Outlining the evidence.

Click here to read more

Kathleen Willey: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Kathleen Willey famously accused then President Bill Clinton of sexual assaulting her in the Oval Office. She appeared in a Donald Trump press conference before the second debate.

Click here to read more

Kathy Shelton Rape Case: 5 Fast Facts You Need To Know

Kathy Shelton was a 12-year-old rape victim. Young Hillary Clinton defended her rapist in court. What happened?

Click here to read more

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


  1. Both these women are clipped haired ugly femist types they would be more belivsble if the were kissed by Hillary than Trump. You better get some lookers before anyone believes this crap.

    • I’d say the timing is dubious at best…..I smell another smear campaign…..and after all of the Wikileaks showing the cozy relationship between the media and Hillary’s campaign, I would question the veracity of the story. The noise you hear is Edward R. Murrow spinning in his grave!!! So much for the Fourth Estate!!!

      • Yeah, you’re totally right. I mean the media hasn’t been giving the Donald any air time whatsoever. Who is this Donald you speak of? Oh, you mean the dude that has spared no expense to SMEAR his opponent? That one? Double Standard meet “Anonymous”. And hello – ever heard of Fox News: yeah, they don’t have a cozy relationship with the Donald whatsoever….

      • Yes I don’t understand this happened some time ago and just out of the blue you decide you now have to tell this I am very suspicious of that, your name may be forever tarnished for a criminal that wants to be first woman president, BIG DEAL!

        • Yeah, gee, I wonder why they waited so long to tell their story? Hmm… so far they have been called (in this string alone):
          — “clipped haired ugly femist types”,
          — “funny how theyre both ugly”,
          — “these women are really full of their self’s B.S. were any of them actually raped and how much did the Clinton campaign pay them”, and
          — “I think the two ladies three ladies and the news lady that wrote this article all need to be prosecuted for defamation of character we all know that this is Hillary’s doing just so she can get elected”.
          One is Truly mystified why they didn’t come forward long ago when kissing someone without their consent, ogling them, or grabbing their p***y was considered harmless “locker room talk”.
          I wonder if they are coming forward now perhaps because with the video and audio of Drumpf’s True character out there for all to hear, and with a woman finally as the nominee of a major party, just maybe they finally feel empowered by the system to stand up for themselves.

          And, I just love how you kind of people commenting in here wanted to crucify Bill Clinton for his indiscretions – both real and alleged – but now you justify Drumpf’s actions because “Well, Clinton did worse and it is Hillary’s fault.” Did that excuse work with your mother when you blamed your brother or sister for doing worse than you did? course not.

          Last but not least, to the insane Gladys Louise: um, lady, I don’t care what world you still want to live in, forcibly kissing anyone IS sexual assault no matter how pretty and cute you want to paint it (“stealing a kiss” – ever had it done to you? it is not cute, it is scary). No ifs ands or buts. Attempting to engage someone and seeing if they respond is one thing, but if they do not respond, back the F off. You better be damn sure before you try to kiss a stranger. No means no. And if you aren’t 100% certain that someone is interested, keep your hands and lips off their hands, lips, and p***y.
          Also, Gladys, I find it truly HILARIOUS that you use a feminist symbol below and then proceed to justify misogyny and sexual assault.

          OMG – this country may truly be doomed if the majority are represented by the uninformed morons in this string……………………….

    • I heard,a news reporter was grabbed, and thrown to the ground by Donald Trump’s campaign manager, a police report was filed,her story was all over the news and then, lo, and behold, it was a lie!

    • Interesting. I find Rachel quite a lovely young lady. Perhaps too “old” for a man who seems to like to trade in his wives every what? 10 years or so? Better watch out Melania. And, frankly, the old Duck (Donald) is a “2” at best. He would be lucky to have someone as lovely as this young woman.

    • Funny, considering how ugly Trump himself is. And since Russian money keeps Trump’s business up, I would not even call that loser succesfull….

      • He is older now, as we all are. He, however used to be very handsome and sexy. I know of 20- 30 something’s who still find him sexy……Sorry!

        • Isn’t still and never was “sexy” or “handsome”. (I just threw up in my mouth) He was a “2” on his best day. I have never met anyone who ever said he is sexy – at least not with a straight face. The only thing you might find “sexy” about him is his supposed wealth – if money is what gets your motor running – it doesn’t do anything for mine.

    • Neither is ugly, and the older woman is now 74 years old. Trump is not an attractive man, but I’m especially baffled by your comment about his business success. What does that have to do with whether or not he assaulted these women? You probably think Bill Cosby was falsely accused.

    • yeah because we know that rich old men would never assault a young woman, or cheat on their first wife, or second wife, or third wife….

    • And the Donald has to provide all the times he was accused of sexual assault! Donald needs to go back to Andover CT for some counseling.

  2. OMG I know if I had been sexually violated in any way it would not take me years to report it or to say something about these women are really full of their self’s B.S. were any of them actually raped and how much did the Clinton campaign pay them seriously I’m a female and I have the utter most respect for women and understand being violated and raped and what it does to you emotionally for the rest of your life and you don’t keep it in until it benefits someone you would explode or commit suicide the Clinton campaign will stop at nothing and these women should be ashamed of their self’s our country need’s help and not a sex scandal especially one that’s years old.

    • Yet is was ok for the Donald to bring out sex scandals that are years old and even hold a press conference? Double Standard meet Linda.
      So you were sexually violated and reported it? If not, shut the hell up. If so, then I am very sorry that happened to you and am glad you found the strength to report it. But, not everyone at every time in their life feels that strength. They may have many reasons to be afraid to come forward – in this case, she was a very young woman dealing with a very wealthy and powerful man and knew that her accusation would probably go no where because of his high-priced attorneys. As for her being part of some Clinton conspiracy – how utterly ridiculous! Do you honestly think she didn’t realize the stupid comments and accusations (such as above) that were going to be hurled at her if she came forward?? This took an amount of courage you couldn’t possibly imagine.
      And in all seriousness people, do you really think the Donald is not capable of these things? Give me a break! Geeve mee a brrrake (google Melania The Late Show). He is the most entitled, delusional, “I can do whatever I want” person I have ever encountered in my life.

      • On November 8th, we will see how much of the population supports and condones sexual exploits on women when they vote for that predator, that person who should be in the sex offender registry. We will see how many of them will sacrifice their ideals just to vote for this creature.

    • Finally. The Truth! Thank you! (course we all knew this years ago….repubs were idiots to ever let this braggadocious moron have the nomination)

  3. 6. She’s an ugly liar. Ask her friends & neighbors, they’ll tell you what she’s known for.
    Besides, if you support Clintons, you’re apparently not that offended by rape or sexual abuse.

  4. This kind of minute analysis of a person’s social media accounts, their private Tweets, their Facebook likes, going through their job history…this is really creepy. What exactly did you learn from this kind of investigation? That she liked a liberal group? That’s just shocking! There are hundreds of political groups on Facebook. There is no insight I can see into her claim of being assault that is taken from this invasive reporting.

    • Being rational has no place in here Liz! Be gone! Before someone drops a house on you too! (Wizard of Oz reference, just in case people don’t catch it)

      I love the argument that she supports Clinton and that is why she is coming forward. Um, DUH she is a Clinton supporter! If she was a Donnie supporter, would she really come forward with this accusation? And, again, maybe just maybe she is coming forward now because she feels empowered by the audio/video tape that proves Donnie boy thinks it is funny to sexually assault women – essentially providing the evidence she probably felt she needed before exposing herself to all the haters in here!!!

  5. Why would you highlight that she liked a page about a movie about being an athiest? To imply she’s not to be trusted? Her religious beliefs have no bearing on this story.

    • Common Lyndsay – are you under the delusion somehow that these people care about relevance? Or an American’s right to freedom of – or From – religion? You give them far too much credit.