Did Third Party Candidates Help Donald Trump Win the Election?

(Getty)

(Getty)

Donald Trump’s surprising victory over Hillary Clinton has many people wondering what impact third party candidates had on the outcome of the election. Those claiming Trump’s victory was caused by third party candidates may want to reconsider.

While there are key swing states where the candidates had more votes than Trump’s margin of victory, it does not necessarily mean their presence led to a different result than if Trump and Clinton had matched up head-to-head.

FiveThirtyEight’s Carl Bialik explained why this is faulty logic.

“Not all of them would have voted for Clinton had they been forced to choose only between her and Trump. And some might not have voted at all. Far more Democrats in Florida in 2000 voted for George W. Bush than voted for Ralph Nader,” Bialik wrote on FiveThirtyEight.

Trump defeated Clinton in Florida by 128,630 votes. Gary Johnson had 204,760 while Jill Stein had 63,648. It is possible many of those voters would have voted for Clinton, but there are no guarantees some of these voters would not have sided with Trump.

It is difficult to project who these voters would have voted for if Stein and Johnson were not on the ballot. In the Florida example, it is conceivable to think the majority of these voters would have voted for Clinton but this does not necessarily mean it is a probable scenario.

19 Comments

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

19 Comments

Harold Newberry

The D.N.C. Nominated Clinton against the will of the people. Sanders would’ve crushed Trump like a bug.

Lisa Hirsch

We can’t know that. Sanders would have been painted a Communist (I saw this happening during the primaries, by the few right-wingers I know), plus he would have been the target of even more vicious anti-Semitic attacks than we saw.

Marie

And you support your point by quoting FiveThirtyEight?! Get out of here. Third party voters did this. FiveThirtyEight is full of crap.

Mark Madel

By focusing on Florida, this article is ignoring the states that are much more compelling evidence to the contrary.

If just 1/4 of the people that voted for Gary Johnson in Wisconsin, 1/10 of those in Michigan, and 1/2 of those in Pennsylvania (~110,000 people total across all 3 states) had voted for Clinton instead, she would now be President – and that’s without even adding in the votes for Stein.

For good or bad, this election, more than any other in recent history, clearly had it’s outcome altered by third party candidates.

Nat

If 1/4, 1/10, and 1/2 of those people from their respective states had to have voted Clinton, but a much much smaller percentage of them would have had to vote Trump to counter this claimed inevitability.

Nat

1/4, 1/10, and 1/2 of those people from their respective states would have had to have voted Clinton, but a much much smaller percentage of them would have had to vote Trump to counter this claimed inevitability.

Discuss on Facebook