Did Jimmy Carter ‘Ban’ Iranian Refugees & Students?
Search Heavy

Did Jimmy Carter ‘Ban’ Iranian Refugees & Students?

Protestors rally  during a demonstration against the Muslim immigration ban at JFK airport January 28 in New York City. (Getty)

Protestors rally during a demonstration against the Muslim immigration ban at JFK airport January 28 in New York City. (Getty)

In response to President Donald Trump‘s executive orders signed January 27, which restrict refugee travel from seven Muslim-based countries, some are looking back at history and comparing the orders to previous U.S.-issued ‘bans’ on groups of people.

In the wake of the Iran hostage crisis, where more than 60 American embassy personnel were held captive in Tehran, President Jimmy Carter took action. The hostages were held by a group of militants for 444 days from 1979-1981, finally being released hours after President Ronald Reagan was sworn in.

In a post to FrontPage Mag, Daniel Greenfield stated that Carter’s actions are similar to what Trump is looking to do.

Greenfield wrote that following the crisis, “Carter issued a number of orders to put pressure on Iran. Among these, Iranians were banned from entering the United States unless they oppose the Shiite Islamist regime or had a medical emergency.”

The New York Times wrote that Carter’s attorney general, Benjamin Civiletti, ordered all Iranians with student visas to report to U.S. immigration officials within one month or face possible deportation.

The order was ruled unconstitutional initially by federal judge Joyce Hens Green, but was reversed less than a year later in September 1980. By then, almost 60,000 students were registered as requested, 430 were deported and 5,000 left voluntarily, PolitiFact reported.

In addition to the Iranian student situation, Carter ordered officials to “invalidate all visas issued to Iranian citizens for future entry into the United States.”

Carter said in a briefing about the matter, “We will not reissue visas, nor will we issue new visas, except for compelling and proven humanitarian reasons or where the national interest of our own country requires. This directive will be interpreted very strictly.”



But, as The Washington Post wrote, the orders didn’t affect large numbers of people at first because “most Iranian via-holders — students, tourists and businessmen — are already in the country and are thus protected from immediate deportation.”

The ban was temporary and ended after the hostage situation came to a conclusion.

As PolitiFact wrote, the difference between Trump and Carter’s bans on refugees is that Carter acted against nationals from Iran, whereas Trump’s orders target a specific religion.

Kermit Roosevelt, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania told PolitiFact in an interview:

The difference is that Iranians were citizens of, and owed allegiance to, a country that was acting against the United States. The class of ‘all Muslims’ has no similar connection to ISIS or terrorists. That makes the analogy seriously flawed.

Immigration law experts came to the conclusion that Carter’s actions were taken in an effort to manage a crisis.


11 Comments

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

11 Comments

David Strom

Um, the Politifact article you quoted isn’t relevant. It was published over a year ago on a proposed ban of Muslim immigration. That is not what the executive order does. There is no Muslim ban, the temporary pause in issuing visas applies to a very small percentage of Muslims. It refers to 7 countries that were identified as problematic by the Obama Administration, specifically not including the largest Muslim countries in the world.

Shoddy reporting here.

JC

Is it the same idiots that of been protesting everything they don’t represent American interest. The media is complicit, they constantly refer to this as being a Muslim ban, when they know it is a ban on radical Islamic jihadist. It’s also only temporary, yet they are making mountains out of mole hills and screening the sky is falling, again, and again. Trying to make reality by repeating lies.

Anonymous

No, they might not represent the whole American Interest but they do represent HUMANITY and a decent amount of knowledge in political games (according to international law, no human should be discriminated against based on their nationality OR religion OR gender, look it up!) … . Have fun with the third world war that’ll start soon thanks to your president of choice now … and as per usual it’ll be the PEOPLE on this planet who will be paying for it with their lives similar to the other wws not your dear orange boy who will be sitting in his palace laughing at how people fell for his little destructive games!

Discuss on Facebook