Lauren Abedini: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

There have been rumblings that Demi Lovato has a new romance with Lauren Abedini, a Los Angeles-based DJ who goes by the stage name KITTENS.

The rumors were sparked by images posted to Twitter of Lovato and Abedini holding hands at Disneyland. At one point, Lovato wrapped her arm around Abedini, leading to specualtion that the two are dating.

According to the New York Post‘s Page Six, neither party has yet confirmed a relationship between the two.

Here’s what you need to know about Abedini:

1. Abedini Is an Up-And-Coming DJ in Los Angeles

HBD @LPAthelabel🌹

A post shared by Lauren KITTENS Abedini (@iamkittens) on

Abedini was born and raised in Los Angeles goes by the stage name KITTENS. She primarily plays “a balance between low grinding electronic beats, heavy rap and future beat music,” her About Me page on her website said.

Abedini is currently on tour with her next show being in Bellingham, Washington on September 22 before she plays a show at the Q Nightclub in Seattle. She also plays numerous shows around the nation at nightclubs.

Abdini started gaining interest in the spinning industry as a college student working in an L.A. nightclub. Soon enough, she was performing at private parties for Usher and opening for Kid Cudi on a tour.

2. Abedini Said She Was Encouraged to Start DJing After Seeing the Gaslamp Killer

In a 2016 interview with Serato, Abedini said she gained interest in being a DJ when she attended a show with one of her friends who’s four years older than her.

“My first experience seeing someone DJ and being like, ‘Holy s**t,’ I remember Gaslamp Killer,” Abedini said, adding the concert experience and musical depth was what drew her in. “This is f*****ng wild, this is so crazy. He was jumping between every different type of music you can imagine… I was like what the f**k is happening, this is so crazy and so cool. That was my first time really seeing a DJ and seeing them as an DJ versus someone who’s the background at the party.”

Abedini started DJing herself and said to Serato that she enjoyed working newer electronic sounds into older beats.

“It’s always something rooted in a soulful, hip-hop, gritty, bass-y sound,” she said.

3. Abedini Said Her Musical Process Involves Taking the Old & Making It New

Lookin like a poodle af lmao🌝

A post shared by Lauren KITTENS Abedini (@iamkittens) on

While she spent time early on playing others’ music, she recently started crafting her own songs. Abedini told Serato that one of her favorite parts of her song-making process is to take a song she enjoys, like an old R&B jam, and ask herself what it is about the song that she likes the most.

“I pull that from there and think about how I can translate that into something that’s current or danceable,” she said. “That’s always a really important element. No matter what I play, there’s always a soulful feeling to it.”

According to her website, Abedini was named a Rising Producer/DJ Shaping the L.A. Club Scene by Mixmag and The Hundreds, and she made Source Magazine‘s list of “25 Women to Watch.”

Abedini is a member of Athletixx, a group that’s trying to introduce a new sound to the music industry called “L.A. Club.” The genre is described as consisting of “eclectic and heavy hitting alternative club music.”

“Now it’s like, ‘How else can you communicate through music?'” Abedini said. “Everyone can play it, how else can you communicate? You have to start making it and show you can press play on your own stuff. Everyone can DJ now, but not everyone is a DJ.”

4. Abedini Teaches in a D.J. Workshop for Women in Her Spare Time

What are you proud of now that you were once ashamed of?

A post shared by Lauren KITTENS Abedini (@iamkittens) on

In her interview with Serato, Abedini spoke out on the lack of female DJs in the world and the credit they fail to receive whenever they make it big.

“In general, our society is pretty misogynistic, especially in club culture and the music industry as a whole,” she said. “It’s always going to be a battle, and sadly I don’t see that changing.”

To help curb the issue, Abedini has taken it upon herself to be a teacher in DJ workshops for females in an organization called PWR x KITTENS.

Never back down. Never give in✊🏽 #womensmarch

A post shared by Lauren KITTENS Abedini (@iamkittens) on

The workshops have the mission of “providing education, empowerment, and support to women who are looking to learn a new skill.”

Abedini partnered with Jay of RUN-D.M.C.’s Scratch DJ Academy and Serato to teach women “the fundamentals of becoming a disc jockey to women in an environment where they can thrive without misogynist judgment,” a Billboard article about the organization said.

Abedini spoke to Billboard for the article and talked about how rough it is being a female in a male-dominate industry.

“A ton of girls I know definitely want to learn, but they’re always scared,” she said to the publication.

All proceeds from the workshops are donated to local shelters.

5. Lovato Broke up With Her Longtime Actor Boyfriend in 2016

Getty Wilmer Valderrama and singer Demi Lovato attend The 58th GRAMMY Awards on February 15, 2016.

Lovato has been involved in a few relationships since she’s became a household name, and her most recent one was with actor Wilmer Valderrama, who most notably played “Fez” on That ’70s Show.

The couple dated for six years, but shocked the world when they released a joint statement on June 3, 2016, announcing they had split.

“After almost 6 loving and wonderful years together, we have decided to end our relationship,” the statement read. “This was an incredibly difficult decision for both of us, but we realized more than anything that we are better as best friends. We will always be supportive of one another.”

A post shared by Demi Lovato (@ddlovato) on

Lovato commented a bit on her sexuality in 2015 on an episode of Alan Carr: Chatty Man, a British late-night talk show. She didn’t outright confirm she’s bisexual, but said there’s nothing wrong with experimenting.

Carr quoted some lyrics from one of Lovato’s songs and asked her if it was about being gay: “Got a taste for the cherry, I just need to take a bite,” Carr read.

“I am not confirming and I’m definitely not denying,” Lovato said. “All of my songs are based off of personal experiences. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with experimentation at all.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



This article is by courtesy of Raven Clabough, of The New American, of Wednesday, August 24, 2016
The Left often likes to use science — or rather, a modified version of science — in arguments related to atheism, evolution, abortion, climate change, etc. But just how it will deal with a new scientific study on transgenderism remains to be seen. According to a new report published in The New Atlantis journal, transgenderism — the latest hot button social justice “ism” — is not supported by science.
The report was co-authored by former Chief of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Hospital and Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University Dr. Paul McHugh and Arizona State University Professor of Statistics and Biostatistics Lawrence Mayer. They concluded that “gender identity” is not separate from biological sex.
“Examining research from the biological, psychological, and social sciences, this report shows that some of the most frequently heard claims about sexuality and gender are not supported by scientific evidence,” the report prefaced.
“The hypothesis that gender identity is an innate, fixed property of human beings that is independent of biological sex — that a person might be ‘a man trapped in a woman’s body’ or ‘a woman trapped in a man’s body’ — is not supported by scientific evidence,” stated the researchers.
This is not exactly groundbreaking news to those who exercise common sense, of course. Simply because an individual purports to identify as something doesn’t make it true, particularly if it is biologically impossible. It does not take a scientific study to confirm that a person who identifies as a horse, for example, is not a horse, or one who identifies as a chair is not in fact a chair. But the study should provide some weight to the common sense approach to transgenderism, while simultaneously exploding the beliefs of some social justice warriors who may have difficulty reconciling this scientific study with their own sense of reality.
The New Atlantis report is sure to provoke some controversy, as it challenges a number of theories that have been readily accepted by the general public in recent years, including what the authors dub the “born that way” hypothesis: “The notion that homosexuality or heterosexuality is in any given person unchangeable and determined entirely apart from choices, behaviors, life experiences, and social contexts.” According to the authors, that view is not “well-supported by research.”
The authors also take issue with the criteria found in the fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) for diagnosis of gender dysphoria in children, and the interventions used in the treatment of gender dysphoria despite the lack of scientific evidence behind them.
At particular issue for the researchers is how transgenderism is being foisted on America’s youth, as the scientists note that most children outgrow gender confusion, and efforts to advocate transgender acceptance are sure to create further confusion. “Children are a special case when addressing transgender issues. Only a minority of children who experience cross-gender identification will continue to do so into adolescence or adulthood,” the report stated.
“There is little scientific evidence for the therapeutic value of interventions that delay puberty or modify the secondary sex characteristics of adolescents, although some children may have improved psychological well-being if they are encouraged and supported in their cross-gender identification,” wrote the researchers. “There is no evidence that all children who express gender-atypical thoughts or behavior should be encouraged to become transgender.”
The report argued that enabling acceptance of transgenderism through medical intervention is particularly harmful. “An area of particular concern involves medical interventions for gender-nonconforming youth. They are increasingly receiving therapies that affirm their felt genders, and even hormone treatments or surgical modifications at young ages,” the authors observed.
These sentiments are similar to those found in a position statement released by the American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) on March 21 entitled “Gender Ideology Harms Children,” in which the writers observed that any policies that foster the belief that gender dysphoria is anything beyond a psychological problem are in fact harmful.
The authors of that position statement made several scientific observations, including that human sexuality “is an objective biological binary trait.” Children who use hormones to attempt to mimic a sex that is not their own have a number of dangerous physical and mental risks, the position statement advised, adding that “conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful” can be classified as child abuse.
According to The New Atlantis study, in fact, conditioning anyone to accept impersonation of the opposite sex via surgery or chemical influences is harmful. The authors observe that adults who choose to have sex-reassignment surgeries have “a higher risk of experiencing poor mental health outcomes.” They cite a study that found that sex-“reassigned individuals were about 5 times more likely to attempt suicide and about 19 times more likely to die by suicide.”
Interestingly, PJ Media did a piece earlier this week on some of the real-life victims of what it dubbed the transgender “cult.” These” victims” were encouraged to embrace their gender confusion in their youth and are now living with the repercussions of those decisions. “I am a real, live 22-year-old woman, with a scarred chest and a broken voice, and five o’clock shadow because I couldn’t face the idea of growing up to be a woman. That’s my reality,” Cari Stella confessed in a YouTube video. “Gender was done to me, gender was traumatizing to me, I don’t want anything to do with it anymore,” she declared. She admitted, “When I was transitioning, I felt a strong desire — what I would have called a ‘need’ at the time — to transition.”
Stella now contends that her transition only made things worse. “It can be damn hard to figure out that the treatment you’re being told is to help you is actually making your mental health worse. Testosterone made me even more dissociated than I already was,” she said.
Stella is a prime example of an observation made by the authors in The New Atlantis study. They wrote, “The potential that patients undergoing medical and surgical sex reassignment may want to return to a gender identity consistent with their biological sex suggests that reassignment carries considerable psychological and physical risk.” The report ultimately concluded that politics and culture have been far too influential in the understanding of transgenderism and LGBT-related mental health problems, and encouraged individuals to take a more scientific approach to these issues.
The researchers wrote, “While there is much controversy surrounding how our society treats its LGBT members, no political or cultural views should discourage us from understanding the related clinical and public health issues and helping people suffering from mental health problems that may be connected to their sexuality.”
They readily admitted that better research is required to determine the best ways to help lower the rates of poor mental health outcomes in the LGBT community, but noted that despite the scientific uncertainty behind sexual orientation and gender identity, “drastic interventions” continue to be prescribed and delivered to patients.
In June, McHugh noted that despite the lack of biological or physical basis for sexual identity, scientists struggled to persuade others that transgenderism is a psychological disorder because “there is a deep prejudice in favor of the idea that nature is totally malleable.”
The authors of the article welcomed “spirited responses” to their report, and it is likely they will be barraged with exactly that.
Please!… no emails!… Jesus is Lord!

Discuss on Facebook