Sanders Supporters’ Emergency Injunction Before California Primary: 5 Fast Facts

Bernie Sanders California, Bernie Sanders injunction, Bernie Sanders speaks

(Getty)

Groups that support Bernie Sanders are expected to file an emergency request with U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup in San Francisco today ahead of the California primary on June 7.

City Attorney Dennis Herrera said in a statement that the allegations the groups, who also made a civil complaint on May 20, made are “wholly baseless.”

Here are the facts of the case:


1. Voting Rights Defense Project is Among the Plaintiffs

Bernie Sanders supporters, Bernie Sanders fans, Bernie Sanders smile

(Getty)


The plaintiffs listed on the emergency request, which you can read here, are the Voting Rights Defense Project, American Independence Party, Clara Daims and Suzanne Bunshell. Daims and Bunshell are two San Francisco voters.

The Voting Rights Defense Project already sued the state last week to have the voter registration deadline moved all the way to election day. In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, Oakland civil rights attorney William Simpich said that there is “mass confusion” and “mistakes are being made” by elections officials in California.


2. Voters Without Preference is Key

Bernie Sanders injunction, Bernie Sanders speech, Bernie Sanders rally

(Getty)


The plaintiffs have accused California elections officials of not making it the rights of voters without preference (“no party preference voters”) clear. They say that officials have not made it clear that these voters can still register as a “no party preference” voter and still get the presidential primary ballots for the Democratic primary, as well as the primaries for other parties. (The Republican presidential primary is closed to only registered Republicans.) They also believe that the “no party preference” voters haven’t been told that they have to get their ballots in by Monday, May 31 to get their ballots in by June 7.

Therefore, the plaintiffs accuse state elections officials of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Constitution.

These Plaintiffs and their associational members have been deprived of voting rights, as have the many similarly situated voters who have complained to their local Boards of Elections regarding applications to vote by mail, early voting, registration, and informational voting rights. Thousands of Californians are in imminent danger of being disenfranchised in the 2016 presidential primary election ending on June 7, 2016, and will continue to be shut out of the democratic process unless and until Defendants reform their voting by mail practices.


3. The Defendants Tim Depuis and John Artnz

Bernie Sanders California, Bernie Sanders rally, Bernie Sanders

(Getty)


The plaintiffs’ request specifically targets Tim Depuis, chief of the Alameda County Registrar of Voters, alleging that he has “engaged in a pattern and practice that will disenfranchise thousands” of voters in the county. Depuis is named one of the defendants.

The complaint reads:

During the last two weeks, this Defendant distributed a series of notices to Alameda County voters that did not provide information that is required to be given to California voters pursuant to Elections Code Section 3000 et seq. Because of this failure to provide proper notice, these voters will be unable to vote for the candidate of their choice unless there is prompt and effective intervention by this court.

The other defendant is John Arttz, the chief of the San Francisco Department of Elections. The plaintiffs insist that the electronic voter application posted on the Oakland and San Francisco websites violated an elections code because they didn’t provide information to “no party preference” voters.


4. Officials Deny the Allegations

Bernie Sanders speaks, Bernie Sanders hands, Bernie Sanders flag

(Getty)

In his statement today, Herrera denied the allegations and called the move “selfish.” He plans to fight the request and praised San Francisco’s elections officials. His office pointed out that voting started on May 9.

Herrera said:

I think it’s unfortunate—and selfish, frankly—that these plaintiffs would inject confusion and uncertainty into an election that has been underway for weeks. San Francisco’s Department of Elections and its employees have been doing an exemplary job, and I’m equally confident that our co-defendants are also meeting or exceeding their legal duties. This lawsuit is without merit, and there is no basis for an emergency injunction. I intend to fight it aggressively.


5. Sanders Is Gaining On Clinton In California

Bernie Sanders slogan, Bernie Sanders hands, Bernie Sanders hair

(Getty)

While Hillary Clinton appears to have the Democratic nomination for president almost wrapped up, Sanders has refused to give up. A recent Public Policy Institute of California poll found that Clinton and Sanders are in a close race in California. The poll showed that Clinton has 49 percent support among Democrats, with Sanders at 41 percent.

Sanders currently has 1,497 delegates to Clinton’s 2,309, so even if Sanders wins California, it won’t stop Clinton from reaching the delegate threshold to secure the nomination.

Correction: A previous version of this post incorrectly reported the results of a recent PPIC poll. Hillary Clinton is ahead in the poll, not Bernie Sanders.


6 Comments

6 Comments

Roxane Davis

It is really getting old hearing Sanders and his supporters whining and moaning about how unfairly the DNC has treated his campaign. Its not the DNC, Sanders just doesn’t have the support of the majority of people who are Democrats and it shows in his delegate and superdelegate count. He is not going to be our nominee for President and filing a preliminary injunction against the California Primary just days before our Primary takes place makes me dislike him even more. I mean really, allowing voter registrations up to Election Day? Asking that voters with “no party preference” who have already voted, be allowed to vote again due to misinformation from the California Voter Registration officials or so Sanders supporters claim. That is so not true as I had to re-register to vote due to a change of address and it was spelled out pretty clearly about which ballots voters with “no party preference” can receive. This preliminary injuction Sanders supporters are asking for is without merit and should be thrown out of court, seems more like a case of bad losers than anything else.

Jonathan Sanders

Hillary led Bernie 49-41 among Democrats, not the other way around. That’s the point of all this–he’s never won Democrats once in this entire primary election. Also, another poll ending the same day showed her up 18. Might be a relevant fact. I don’t know.

pyradius

The more relevant number to use would have been the 46 H to 44 B among likely Democratic voters, not simply those registered as Democrats.

emmajasee33

I get paid £90 every hour from online jobs. II never thought I’d be able to do it but my friend AU is earning £10k /monthly by doing this job and she showed me how.O3..Try it out on following website..

…………….. CashPay56.TK

Discuss on Facebook