WATCH: Biden Makes the Case for Merrick Garland Supreme Court Confirmation

Merrick Garland, Supreme Court Justice nominee, Antonin Scalia replacement

Merrick Garland was nominated to fill Antonin Scalia’s seat on the Supreme Court in March. (Getty)

The Obama Administration’s weekly address was another two-person show, following last week’s address with President Barack Obama and Elizabeth Warren. This time, Vice President Joe Biden is joined by Federal Judge Timothy Lewis to make the case for Merrick Garland finally being confirmed as a Supreme Court justice.


It’s Been 135 Days Since Garland’s Nomination

Weekly Address: It’s Time to Fill the Vacancy on the Supreme CourtIn this week's address, retired Federal Judge Timothy Lewis joined Vice President Joe Biden to discuss the nomination of Chief Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court of the United States.2016-07-30T08:00:02.000Z

Obama nominated Garland on March 16, a month after the death of Antonin Scalia. Therefore, it’s been 135 days since Garland was nominated, the longest wait ever for a vote in the Senate, where Republicans have refused to hold confirmation hearings until a new president is elected.

The Obama Administration and Senate Democrats have noted that Garland is respected by both sides of the aisle and is a considerably less liberal choice than who Obama could have gone with. The lack of nine justices on the court also means that some decisions can end in 4-4 ties, like the one last month that blocked Obama’s executive order on immigration. Deadlocked decisions leave lower court rulings to stand.

“Unresolved decisions by the Supreme Court are leading to federal laws that should apply to the whole country being constitutional in some parts but unconstitutional in others,” Lewis explained. “If this continues, our freedom of speech, our freedom to practice our faith, our right to vote, our right to privacy—all could depend on where we happen to live.”

“If you have eight Justices on a case, Justice Scalia himself wrote, that it raises the, ‘possibility that, by reason of a tie vote, the Court will find itself unable to resolve the significant legal issue presented by the case,'” Biden said Saturday. “And if Republican Senators fail to act, it could be an entire year before a fully staffed Supreme Court can resolve any significant issue before it.”


Justice Kennedy Was Confirmed in an Election Year

Anthony Kennedy: Supreme Court Nomination Hearings from PBS NewsHour and EMK InstituteStay Informed: http://emkinstitute.org/kennedyvid As the Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan get underway, the Edward M. Kennedy Institute is partnering with the PBS NewsHour to provide video highlights of the nine most recent Senate confirmation hearings. Justice Kennedy won confirmation in 1988 by a 97-0 vote, still the last nominee to ascend to the Court without a single Senator in opposition.2010-06-25T17:15:13.000Z

One Republican argument for not confirming Garland has been that it has been 80 years since a justice was confirmed during an election year. Senator Ted Cruz even said this during one of the Republican presidential debates. However, Justice Anthony Kennedy was confirmed by the Democrat-controlled Senate in February 1988. The big difference in that case though was that Kennedy was nominated by President Ronald Reagan in November 1987, The Washington Post notes.

“Every nominee got out of the committee to the Senate floor, even when a nominee did not receive majority support in my committee,” Biden, who was in the Senate at the time of Kennedy’s confirmation, said. “And every nominee, including Justice Kennedy—in an election year—got an up or down vote by the Senate. Not much of the time. Not most of the time. Every single time.”


Here’s the full transcript of this week’s address:

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Hi, folks. Joe Biden here and I’m sitting with Tim Lewis, a retired federal judge who was nominated to the bench by a Republican President and confirmed by a Democratic Senate—within four weeks of a presidential election.

JUDGE LEWIS: Hello, everyone. That’s right. And I’m living proof that President Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court—Chief Judge Merrick Garland—deserves similar consideration by today’s Senate.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Not only because Merrick Garland is recognized—without exception—by the right and the left as one of America’s sharpest legal minds and a model of integrity.

JUDGE LEWIS: But also because that’s what the Constitution requires. The sitting President shall—not may—but shall nominate someone to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court, with the advice and consent of the Senate. That includes consulting and voting.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Here’s how it works. For 17 years, I was chairman or ranking member of Senate Judiciary Committee, which overseas nominations to the Court. I presided over nine total nominations—more than anyone alive. Some I supported. Others I didn’t. But every nominee was greeted by committee members. Every nominee got a committee hearing. Every nominee got out of the committee to the Senate floor, even when a nominee did not receive majority support in my committee. And every nominee, including Justice Kennedy—in an election year—got an up or down vote by the Senate. Not much of the time. Not most of the time. Every single time. That’s the Constitution’s clear rule of Advice and Consent. And that’s the rule being violated today by Senate Republicans.

Nobody is suggesting that Senators have to vote “yes” on a nominee. Voting “no” is always an option. But saying nothing, seeing nothing, reading nothing, hearing nothing, and deciding in advance simply to turn your backs—is not an option the Constitution leaves open.

JUDGE LEWIS: And it has real consequences for all of us. In the four months since Merrick Garland’s nomination, we’ve already seen how the Senate’s refusal to act is preventing the Court from fulfilling its duty of interpreting what the law is and resolving conflicts in lower courts. Historic obstruction is leading to greater litigation costs and delays—the burden falling mostly on average Americans rather than corporations with endless resources. Unresolved decisions by the Supreme Court are leading to federal laws that should apply to the whole country being constitutional in some parts but unconstitutional in others. If this continues, our freedom of speech, our freedom to practice our faith, our right to vote, our right to privacy—all could depend on where we happen to live.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: And the longer the vacancy remains unfilled, the more serious the problem—with greater confusion and uncertainty about our safety and security. If you have eight Justices on a case, Justice Scalia himself wrote, that it raises the, “possibility that, by reason of a tie vote, the Court will find itself unable to resolve the significant legal issue presented by the case.” And if Republican Senators fail to act, it could be an entire year before a fully staffed Supreme Court can resolve any significant issue before it.

Folks, there’s enough dysfunction in Washington, D.C. Now is not the time for it to spread to the Supreme Court.

JUDGE LEWIS: And we’re better than what we’re seeing. As a country, we’re only as strong as the traditions we value—that we sustain by dedicating ourselves to something bigger than ourselves.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Folks, the defining difference of our great democracy has always been that we can reason our way through to what ails us and then act as citizens, voters, and public servants to fix it. But we have to act in good faith. For unless we find common ground, we cannot govern. For the sake of the country we love—we all have to do our job. The President has done his. Senate Republicans must do theirs.

Thanks for listening and have a great weekend.