How Many People Watched Trump’s Inauguration vs. Obama’s?

trumps inauguration numbers

Trump’s inauguration numbers. (Getty)

The audience for President Donald Trump’s inauguration hit national news again when his press secretary, Sean Spicer, made the viewership the main focus of a White House press briefing on Saturday. Spicer then addressed the question again during a press conference on Monday. He said that more people watched Trump’s inauguration than ever before. Some were quick to criticize those statements. But what are the facts on this? How many people actually watched Trump’s inauguration as compared to former President Barack Obama’s? According to crowd estimates and Nielsen ratings, Obama did have greater numbers than Trump in both crowd size and TV viewership. However, if you combine viewership and crowd attendance, Trump’s inauguration was indeed one of the most-watched inaugurations of all time. And his live stream viewership may have been the greatest in all time, according to Forbes.

Here’s what you need to know.

Trump’s Inauguration Had the Third-Highest Viewership on TV Since 1981

According to Nielsen ratings, Trump’s swearing-in was watched by 30.6 million viewers across 12 networks. That’s a higher viewership than any other swearing-in over since Obama’s in 2009. Obama’s first inauguration was watched by 37.8 million viewers, Entertainment Weekly reported.

But another inauguration beat them both out. Back in 1981, Ronald Reagan’s inauguration was watched by 41.8 million viewers, according to Nielsen ratings. Interestingly, Trump’s numbers are across 12 networks while Obama’s are across 17 channels. Reagan’s numbers are only across three networks: ABC, NBC, and CBS.

Trump’s inauguration TV viewership was the third-highest in Nielsen ratings– that’s still an impressive reach.

Trump’s Numbers Got a Boost Via Online Streaming, But Obama Had More Livestreams on CNN

These ratings don’t account for online streaming, which could give Trump’s numbers a big boost. Spicer stressed on Monday that when you add in mobile device livestreaming, like phones and tablets, Trump’s viewership may indeed be the highest.

Because livestream viewing has increased significantly since Obama’s inauguration, thanks to social media and other livestreaming options, it’s possible that these numbers could indeed give Trump’s total a big boost if compared to how many streamed Obama’s inauguration. But since overall livestream estimates aren’t available, it may not be possible to know the numbers 100 percent. It’s also hard to make an apples-to-apples comparison, since livestream viewing in general is more popular now than it was in 2009. But we can at least get a few hints from the facts that we have.

CNN Livestreaming Numbers Give Boost to Obama

Here’s one set of numbers to look at, just to start us off. Trump’s inauguration had 16.9 million live streams on CNN, with a peak of 2.3 million watching at the same time during a peak moment of Trump’s speech. Spicer pointed this out on Monday, January 23, citing that Reagan’s inauguration was watched by 41 million on TV, but if you add 16.9 million CNN online viewers to 30.6 million TV viewers for Trump, then his numbers are higher than Reagan’s 41.8.

“I’m pretty sure Reagan didn’t have YouTube or Facebook,” Spicer said.

However, he’s not looking at Obama’s CNN numbers. Obama’s first inauguration, The Guardian reported, had 21 million video streams on CNN, shattering CNN’s previous 5 million record. (CNN later upgraded that number to 25 million live streams.) So we do know that estimates show Obama’s 2009 CNN livestream numbers were greater than Trump’s in 2017.

Akamai Says Trump’s Inauguration Was Its Largest Streaming Event

Akamai, which is one of the world’s largest content delivery network providers, working with sites like New York Times and Wall Street Journal, recorded up to 7.7 million livestreams at one time, at peak viewing time during Obama’s first inauguration in 2009, CNET reported. According to Tech Crunch, at the peak of Trump’s inauguration, 4.6 million concurrent viewers were watching the inauguration live online. However, we’re not sure if Tech Crunch’s number came from the same sources as CNET’s original estimate, because the Akamai Vice President later goes on to say that the presidential inauguration was “the latest in a series of record-breaking live, online video streaming events that we have supported over the last year.” And at the beginning of its story, Tech Crunch says that Trump’s inauguration was “the largest, single live news event that … Akamai has ever hosted.”

According to Tech Crunch, Akamai’s numbers show that live video streaming during Trump’s speech peaked at 8.7 Tbps, surpassing the previous record of 7.5 Tbps during election day night. Meanwhile, streaming for Obama in 2009 peaked at 1.1 Tbps. However, this isn’t an apples-to-apples comparison. HD video streaming requires higher bitrates than back in 2009, and there are more people who watch streaming videos now in general. According to Tech Crunch, the average connection speed during the 2009 inauguration was 4.1 Mbps, and the average connection speed in 2016 is 15.2 Mbps.


Additional Numbers

Here are some other facts about web traffic.

CNN reported more than 160 million page views during Obama’s first inauguration, within a 12-hour time span, including a period of time when the site’s live page apparently went down. In 2017, for Trump’s inauguration, CNN reported 173 million page views throughout the day, slightly edging out Obama’s numbers.

Facebook saw 600,000 status updates, CNET reported. Associated Press reported 8 million live video streams during the inauguration. And Mogulus, a live-streaming service for C-SPAN, USA Today, and other newspapers, had 1 million visitors. MSNBC reported 9 million livestreams, and Fox News reported 5 million streams.

We haven’t been able to find apples-to-apples comparisons to these numbers for Trump’s inauguration yet. We do know that Trump’s inauguration had a record-breaking 6.82 million unique views to Twitter’s live feed of the inauguration, a service that wasn’t available during Obama’s inauguration. Twitter livestreamed six hours with PBS News Hour. Users also sent more than 12 million tweets related to the inauguration. Trump also likely gained numbers from Facebook’s livestreaming service, which also wasn’t available during Obama’s inauguration.

The numbers from Associated Press, Facebook, Mogulus and some other sources for Trump’s inauguration aren’t yet available, as of the time of publication. We’ll add them to this story once they are, so you can compare and contrast the two. There were also many livestream options not available to Obama back in 2009 that are available now, which certainly gave Trump a huge boost.

Estimates Show Obama’s First Inauguration Had a Greater Attendance than Trump’s

Obamas first inauguration. Getty

Obama’s first inauguration. (Getty)

Estimates of inauguration crowds aren’t an exact science. The National Park Service doesn’t publicly release official estimates, ever since a dispute about how many attended a Million Man March in 1995. Now, estimates are given by law enforcement officials or federal officials, or organizers.

Obama’s first inauguration was attended by a huge number of people: more than 1.8 million, CNN reported. This was a huge number of people, eclipsing the previous record of 1.2 million set by Lyndon B. Johnson’s 1965 inauguration. This is also about double the number of people who showed up for Trump’s inauguration, if you generously give Trump’s inauguration the maximum attendance estimate.

On Friday, January 20, officials began estimating early that Donald Trump’s inauguration was attended by about 900,000 people maximum. However, a more “official” tally may be tough to obtain, since the Parks Service no longer gives official numbers. Others estimated the attendance as being much smaller, but these estimates have not been verified. Earlier on inauguration morning, the numbers for Trump’s attendance were looking small. DC Metro estimated that there were about 193,000 for Trump’s inauguration at a time when, in 2013, there were 317,000 for Obama’s second inauguration, and at the same time in 2009, there were 513,000 people. Trump’s numbers did end up growing, but they did not match the number who showed up for Obama’s first inauguration. Planners had estimated a maximum of about 900,000 expected to Trump’s inauguration, Fox 25 reported. Homeland Security placed the number at about 800,000 to 900,000 expected. The inaugural committee, meanwhile, had estimated about 700,000 people would watch the inauguration.

In conclusion, if you combine Nielsen ratings and estimated crowd sizes, then Obama’s first inauguration had greater viewership than Trump’s. It all gets a little fuzzy once you start calculating in streaming, however. There’s not a really good way to quantify total streaming at this point, but one comparison currently available showed Obama got more live streams on CNN than Trump.

During a press briefing on Saturday, Sean Spicer said: “This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration — period — both in person and around the globe.” It’s unclear how he would know how many people watched the inauguration from around the globe or what information he had access to in order to reach that conclusion at the time of the press conference. However, we do know that many sources are now estimating that Trump’s inauguration was indeed likely the highest-viewed inauguration in livestream history.

To see detailed stories about the crowd size of Trump’s inauguration, please see these stories below:



Al soltero

From any YouTube video check how many Thumbs down in Trump inauguration, that many people can’t be wrong, the white house became a circus


I checked your numbers. 24.5% thumbs down. Compared to the views, the number of comments will be extremely low. In such a charged, emotional post as an inauguration, people don’t give much thought to commenting. I know I didn’t and I try to like and comment on any YouTube content as I know this helps make YouTube better. A better YouTube is in my best interests. Don’t forget, also, that the Obama inaugurations were our first black president. That’s history happening before you so the person’s politics and progress will have much less to do with views than their skin color for such an event. The current topic is a perfect example. Logic dictates that we just elected a much more qualified, savvy and wisened man to office than Obama. Obama had never in his life seen a job clear through (not even his job in the Senate) until he became President. Do you think he would have gotten the numbers at his inauguration that he got with his lack of credentials if he had been a white man? Not a chance.


If your meterics are based on youtube thumbs counts, then you clearly have no concept of reality.


Trump must have had more online viewers around the globe, as the world is reacting against globalization to favor the independent nation state again.


Nope. We watched as we are scared that new US president might turn a booming US economy into a mid-term disaster. It’s actually in our best interest for US to fluorish. Our economies are so intertwined that only option is to work together and make the World a better place for everyone, not just the billionaires. Unfortunately, Trump decided for protectionism which leads to isolationism and various other irrational ideas of far past. Ideas that led to more than a few large-scale crisis and wars. Reversal of everything good that we managed to build in 20th and 21st centuries so far is a definition of irrationality. We got exactly what we hoped to be campaign spins.


Your comments on isolationism and protectionism clearly indicate a context weak understanding of the concepts. Every nation prospers when it looks out for its own self-interests first. Most nations, in fact, do just this. China is a good example as it has the biggest population. Western products are highly taxed by them and many things (like the global Internet) are banned in large part in China. Why? Because doing so is in China’s best interests as they see it (and they know their people, culture and needs better than we do even if we think we’re smarter than they are.) When each country acts for its own best interests, it is like private individuals doing business with each other. As each person looks after their own best interests, the best and most practical arrangements for both parties are the result. You’ve been brainwashed by the left and their “forget the lessons of the past and do as we tell you because it will feel good” idealism.


It is a long understood phenomenon amongst the community of economic experts that Presidents have much less control over the state of the economy or Wall Street than we give them credit for. The economy goes up and down and it doesn’t care much who is in office. That doesn’t mean the President has no power. If he leads the nation in ways that sponsor economic growth and his successors continue the same trends, the economy will benefit. But no President can be credited or blamed for any state of the economy; only as an accessory or assistant to the inevitable. Now, if a President could hold office for a couple of decades, maybe his policies could start to more directly effect the economy.


Oh, right, a booming economy with almost 96 million Americans out of work! Your comments fall under the category of delusional!


Oh, right, a booming economy with almost 96 million Americans out of work! Your comments fall under the category of delusional!

Discuss on Facebook