Trump announced his selection of Gorsuch to join the Supreme Court on January 31. The president said about Gorsuch during his announcement speech:
Judge Gorsuch has outstanding legal skills, a brilliant mind, tremendous discipline and has earned bipartisan support. It is an extraordinary resume — as good as it gets.
Now, replacing Scalia turns to the confirmation process for Gorsuch. He is almost assured to incite a “political brawl” early on in Trump’s presidency from the opposition in confirmation hearings.
But, as the Los Angeles Time wrote, Gorsuch, a 49-year-old conservative judge from Colorado, is “likely to be confirmed.”
Here’s what you need to know about Gorsuch:
1. Gorsuch Was Appointed by George W. Bush to the U.S. Court of Appeals
Through his decade on the Court of Appeals, he became known as a “feeder judge,” which means numerous of his law clerks went on to be Supreme Court clerks.
2. He Holds Degrees From Prestigious Universities
Gorsuch was born in Denver, Colorado and graduated from Georgetown Preparatory School.
After that, he earned his J.D. from Harvard Law School. Then, Gorsuch earned a Doctorate of Legal Philosophy from Oxford University. At Oxford, he studied Marshall Scholar.
With a firm education, Gorsuch worked his way through the judicial ranks, clerking for various judges, including the Supreme Court for Justices Byron White and Anthony Kennedy. He then went into private practice and served as the Deputy Associate Attorney General for the U.S. Department of Justice from 2005-2006.
3. Gorsuch Has Worked on Two Books
Gorsuch is also an experienced author.
His first book was called The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia, which gives an overview of legal and ethical challenges that assisted suicide and euthanasia have created. The book was published by the Princeton University Press in the summer of 2006.
According to Princeton, the book gives the “most comprehensive argument against the legalization of the two ever published.”
Gorsuch assesses the strengths and weaknesses arguments for, and against assisted suicide and euthanasia. He goes through past cases and analizes the arguments for legalization.
The book comes to the conclusion that “the idea that human life is intrinsically valuable and that intentional killing is always wrong.” It also speaks about the refusal of unwanted medical treatment and life-saving care.
Gorsuch was also a co-author of The Law of Judicial Precedent, a book published by Thomson West in 2016. He was one of 13 coauthors on the book, which focused on the doctrine of precedent.
4. His Mother, Anne Gorsuch, Was the First Female EPA Administrator
Gorsuch is the son of Anne Gorsuch Burford. She died in 2004 after a battle with cancer in Colorado, a Washington Post obituary story wrote. She was 62-years old when she died.
Neil’s mom is mostly known for being the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency under then-President Ronald Reagan. She became the first female head of the government agency when she was appointed.
Reagan appointed her because he cited her as a “leader in his effort to bring economic discipline to environmental cleanup and to give the states greater enforcement powers on matters like clean air and water,” the New York Times reported. However, critics blamed her for assisting industries that were leaders in pollution. The claims against Anne were magnified when documents regarding toxic waste cleanup were ordered by a subcommittee of the House of Representatives. She refused to hand the documents over, instead saying that she would rather go to jail than surrender to Congress. She resigned from the role in March of 1983.
5. Gorsuch Reportedly is Similar to Anton Scalia
If Gorsuch is selected as Trump’s nominee, he would replace late Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in 2016 of natural causes.
As SCOTUSBlog.com wrote, Gorsuch’s writing background is similar in nature for Scalia’s.
Most notably, Gorsuch’s “originalist interpretation of the Constitution” is similar in line to Scalias.
Gorsuch is noted as of having “a set of judicial/ideological commitments apart from his personal policy preferences that drive his decision-making, SCOTUSBlog.com reported. Similar to Scalia, his decisions have shown that he believes criminal laws must be clear and typically portrayed in favor with defendants. He is also wary of removing religious expressions from spaces in the public, the blog wrote.
The two share some of the same opinions, as evidence by Gorsuch’s decision in 2008 in the United States vs. Hinckley. In the decision, he argued that the reading of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act likely violates the non-delegation principle. It was the same reasoning that Scalia wrote in dissent in 2012 following Reynolds vs. United States.
This post will be updated.