Skurski noted that Beasley may end up following through on his threat to retire, but the Bills could also decide to save the money and cut him loose instead. Cutting Beasley would save $5.341 million against the cap in 2021, along with dead-money hits of $2 million and $1.5 million over the next two years, which Skurski said were “reasonable.”

Decisions on Slot Position

It’s not just Beasley’s controverisal stance on vaccines that could endanger his spot on the roster, Skurski noted. He pointed out that the Bills have grown very deep at slot receiver, and cutting Beasley could allow some younger players to step into his place. Beasley was plagued by injuries at the conclusion of last season, missing the season finale and playing hobbled throughout the playoffs.

Others have already suggested that there’s a better slot receiver already on the Bills roster. Doug Farrar of USA Today’s Touchdown Wire this week unveiled the ranking of the league’s top slot receivers, and a different Bills pass-catcher landed on the list instead of Beasley.

The site listed Isaish McKenzie as the ninth-best slot receiver in the NFL, noting that he looked better out of the slot despite getting fewer chances than Beasley.

“Like all great slot receivers, McKenzie has the ability to elude defenders with quick option and movement concepts in compressed areas, and there’s no more compressed area than the red zone,” Farrar noted. “That’s why McKenzie caught six touchdown passes on just 21 overall slot catches and 23 targets for 152 yards.”

If the Bills decide to go with the younger (and cheaper) McKenzie as the starting slot receiver, it could spell the end of Beasley’s time with the team.

READ NEXT: Analyst Predicts Monstrous Year for Bills’ Josh Allen, Makes New Prediction