Guccifer 2.0: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Who’s behind the hacking of the nearly 20,000 Democratic National Committee emails and other documents distributed by WikiLeaks? He claims to be a hacktivist known as “Guccifer 2.0,” but Hillary Clinton’s campaign says that’s just a cover story for Russian intelligence.

Donald Trump’s campaign calls the claimed Russian connection “absurd,” and WikiLeaks denies Russian intelligence is behind the document dump:

Little is known about the man (and he does say he is one) whose hacking may have led to the massive WikiLeaks email dump that provoked the resignation of DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and derailed the DNC’s focus going into the Democratic National Convention. He’s claimed on Twitter that he’s behind the WikiLeaks dump, although WikiLeaks hasn’t revealed its sources.

Guccifer 2.0 on Aug. 12 released passwords related to the DNC hack, including Congressional contact lists.

Little is known about Guccifer 2.0, but he has provided some clues; for example, he has a blog, a social media presence, and he’s given one lengthy interview in the past. He’s not the same person as the original Guccifer, a Romanian hacker who is in jail. US officials now say “the emails were hacked from DNC servers in an operation originating in Russia that appeared to be linked to Moscow’s intelligence agency,” according to CNN, and Trump has caused controversy by saying he hoped that Russia could find Clinton’s deleted emails.

Here’s what you need to know:

1. Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Thinks He’s Really The Russians & Trump’s Says That’s ‘Absurd’

Hillary Clinton’s campaign highlighted the Russian claim on CNN’s “State of the Union” when Robby Mook, who runs Clinton’s presidential campaign, told Jake Tapper that “experts” say “Russian state actors broke into the DNC, stole these emails, and other experts are now saying that the Russians are releasing these emails for the purpose of actually helping Donald Trump,” said Cnet. Trump’s campaign head Paul Manafort responded that Mook’s accusations were “absurd,” and said “there was no basis for it.” See:

So what’s the evidence? Major U.S. media had reported before the WikiLeaks document dump that there was evidence that the Russians had penetrated the DNC, although no one’s definitively proven that Guccifer 2.0 or the latest WikiLeaks dump derive from that or are tied to it.

On June 14, before the WikiLeaks document dump, The Washington Post reported that “Russian government hackers penetrated the computer network of the Democratic National Committee and gained access to the entire database of opposition research on GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, according to committee officials and security experts.” The Post said that Trump and Republican networks were also compromised but noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin has praised Trump, and said that the Kremlin denied the hack. Motherboard claims that the Russian government created Guccifer 2.0 as a cover story when past hacks were exposed.

However, others believe that people are conflating the previous Russian hack of the DNC and Guccifer 2.0.

On June 20, a month before the WikiLeaks’ document dump, The Washington Post wrote that “two independent research firms have confirmed an assessment by the Democratic National Committee that its network was compromised by Russian government hackers” and said they used malware analysis and domain name techniques to trace the hacks. The Post said a few days later, “‘Guccifer 2.0’ claimed responsibility for the hack in an apparent attempt to deflect blame from the Russian government.” The Russian-aligned hacking groups were called Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear, said The Post. The Post concluded, “Analysts suspect but don’t have hard evidence that Guccifer 2.0 is, in fact, part of one of the Russian groups who hacked the DNC.”

On July 13, The Hill wrote that “Guccifer 2.0, the hacker who breached the Democratic National Committee, has released a cache of purported DNC documents to The Hill in an effort to refocus attention on the hack.” Guccifer felt that his early releases were not getting enough media attention, The Hill said. He wrote The Hill, ““The press [is] gradually forget[ing] about me, [W]ikileaks is playing for time and [I] have some more docs.”

The Hill said Guccifer 2.0 “shows a detailed knowledge of American politics seemingly at odds with the backstory provided by the hacker” and added that “Experts have questioned whether Guccifer 2.0 is Romanian or even a single person. Tools used in the attack were matched to Russian intelligence agencies and, when tested, Guccifer 2.0 has struggled to speak in Romanian.”

Defense One magazine says: “On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network.” The Russian claim was backed up by details such as hacking groups ceasing operations on Russian holidays and having work hours that aligned with the Russian time zone, said Defense One. The Post noted the timing, saying that Guccifer 2.0 started posting stolen DNC documents the day after the private firm, CrowdStrike, revealed its findings about Russia in a blog. In 2015, U.S. officials accused Russia of hacking into the Pentagon’s Joint Staff unclassified email system, said CNBC.

According to Raw Story, DNC officials told online magazine Motherboard, “Our experts are confident in their assessment that the Russian government hackers were the actors responsible for the breach detected in April, and we believe that the subsequent release and the claims around it may be a part of a disinformation campaign by the Russians.” Raw Story said DNC officials made this claim after previous “investigations” of Guccifer 2.0 and an interview he gave in June.

2. Guccifer 2.0 Has a Website On Which He Claims He’s From Eastern Europe & Has No Ties to The Russians

On a website run through WordPress, the hacktivist Guccifer 2.0 acknowledged the question, “A lot of people are concerned if I have any links to special services and Russia?” Guccifer 2.0 answered, “I’ll tell you that everything I do I do at my own risk. This is my personal project and I’m proud of it. Yes, I risk my life. But I know it’s worth it. No one knew about me several weeks ago. Nowadays the whole world’s talking about me. It’s really cool!”

The hacktivist said he was “born in Eastern Europe. I won’t answer where I am now. In fact, it’s better for me to change my location as often as possible. I have to hide.” The Hill previously said: “Guccifer 2.0 has claimed to be a Romanian hacker with no strong political leanings.”

He continued, “It seems the guys from CrowdStrike and the DNC would say I’m a Russian bear even if I were a catholic nun in fact. At first I was annoyed and disappointed. But now I realize they have nothing else to say. There’s no other way to justify their incompetence and failure. It’s much easier for them to accuse powerful foreign special services.”

3. He’s Not The Same Person as the Romanian Hacker Known as ‘Guccifer’

The original Guccifer, according to The Hill, Marcel Lehel Lazar, has entered a plea deal to cooperate with the U.S. government. He has claimed he broke into Hillary Clinton’s private server, the Hill said, although that was never proven. In May, he agreed to plead guilty to hacking and identity theft, NBC News says.

According to NBC, Lazar was accused by prosecutors of breaking “into the e-mail and social media accounts of roughly 100 Americans, including a former U.S. cabinet member and members of the family of former presidents George W. and George H.W. Bush.” NBC said he is a 44-year-old former taxi driver from Romania whose nickname, Guccifer, is “pronounced GOO-chi-fer” and combines “the style of Gucci and the light of Lucifer.”

In fact, Guccifer 2.0 says he was inspired by the Romanian hacker, writing on his blog, “Marcel Lazar is another hero of mine. He inspired me and showed me the way. He proved that even the powers that be have weak points.”

4. Guccifer 2.0 Says He’s Inspired by Julian Assange & Edward Snowden & He Gave an Interview Once to a Magazine

On his website, Guccifer 2.0 writes, “Assange, Snowden, and Manning are the heroes of the computer age. They struggle for truth and justice; they struggle to make our world better, more honest and clear. People like them make us hope for tomorrow. They are the modern heroes, they make history right now.” Assange is WikiLeaks’ founder. Snowden is a former NSA contractor who exposed U.S. surveillance. Bradley Manning is a soldier convicted of espionage.

Guccifer 2.0 gave a June 2016 interview to Motherboard magazine. He had already broken into DNC servers and was leaking documents, although the real damage did not occur until WikiLeaks dumped more than 20,000 DNC emails, and other documents into the public sphere. In the Motherboard interview, Guccifer 2.0 claims: “i’m a hacker, manager, philosopher, women lover. I also like Gucci! I bring the light to people. I’m a freedom fighter! So u can choose what u like!” Read the full interview transcript here.

He again denied being affiliated with Russia, saying, “No because I don’t like Russians and their foreign policy. I hate being attributed to Russia.” He said he hacked the DNC server in summer 2015 and remained inside it until the DNC rebooted its system in June, 2016.

5. He Says He Targeted The DNC Because The U.S. Election is ‘Exciting’ & He Doesn’t Like Hillary But Doesn’t Like Everything About Trump, Either

Guccifer 2.0 writes on his blog that “none of the candidates has my sympathies. Each of them has skeletons in the closet and I think people have a right to know the truth about the politicians.” He called Hillary “false,” saying she “got all her money from political activities and lobbying, she is a slave of moguls, she is bought and sold. She never had to work hard and never risked everything she had. Her words don’t meet her actions. And her collision with the DNC turned the primaries into farce.”

He wrote that he likes that “Donald Trump has earned his money himself. And at least he is sincere in what he says. His position is straight and clear” but says he doesn’t necessarily support Trump because he opposes his “ideas about closing borders and deportation policy. It’s a nonsense, absolute bullshit.”

Guccifer 2.0 wrote that he targeted the DNC in part because the U.S. election is exciting and the hack would make him famous. On his website, he writes, “As for the DNC, first, the U.S. election race is one of the most exciting events that attracts people from all over the world. My hack wouldn’t go unnoticed in any case. And now I have my own fans who put me in a line with Assange and Snowden, so my bet has played I think.”

He said he was able to hack into the DNC servers by exploiting software on their system and then installing “my Trojan like virus on their PCs. I just modified the platform that I bought on the hacking forums for about $1.5k.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



Please fix Chelsea Manning’s name in this article. Unless the author is just transphobic?


That was a lot of words used to say essentially nothing, but does cast aspersions on Trump and Russia with the flimsiest of evidence.

Discuss on Facebook