Trump vs Clinton 2016: Hillary leads the Polls

general election polls, Donald Trump polls, Hillary Clinton polls

Hillary Clinton would be a general election favorite. (Getty)

With Ted Cruz announcing the suspension of his campaign after a win for Donald Trump in Indiana, the latter has all but locked up the Republican nomination for president. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton lost to Bernie Sanders in the states Democratic primary but is still on track to be the nominee. With these two facts in mind, it’s time to start thinking about the general election.

Clinton is ahead in the latest polls comma amid betting Market speculation that the Democrats we’ll take the White House regardless of the nominees. However, most polls were taken before the likely end of the Republican race comma and the general election season may end up looking nothing like the polls.

Here’s a look at the state of the race:

Matchup Polls: Clinton Well Ahead

Despite Trump’s assertion that Clinton would be “easy to beat,” he’s significantly behind in most general election match-up polls against hers, though not as far back as in races against Sanders.

RealClearPolitics: Clinton vs. Trump Clinton Trump
Rasmussen 39 41
IBD/TIPP 47 40
USA Today/Suffolk 50 39
GWU/Battleground 46 43
Average 46.7 40.5

While Trump is still behind in most polls, he’s made up significant ground after a losing streak dating back to February, in which most polls had him losing by double digits.

Favorability: Both Low, Trump Lower

Clinton and Trump combine for the most-hated frontrunner duo in favorability polling history. This is certainly bad news for Clinton, but there’s a ray of hope: she’s doing far better than Trump, who is the least-liked candidate since polls began tracking the issue.

Hillary Clinton Favorability Ratings Unfavorable Favorable Margin
USA Today/Suffolk 55 40 -15
PRRI/The Atlantic 54 37 -17
The Economist/YouGov 54 42 -12
RealClearPolitics Average 38.4 54.9 -16.5

Donald Trump Favorability Ratings Unfavorable Favorable Margin
Economist/YouGov 63 33 -30
USA Today/Suffolk 61 28 -33
GWU/Battleground 65 32 -33
RealClearPolitics Average 65.4 28.4 -37

Democrats Favored in the Betting Markets

The betting markets, as aggregated by PredictWise, don’t track hypothetical matchups, and likely won’t handle general election candidates by name until they’re named as such at the party conventions. In party terms, however, the markets like the Democrats’ chances, giving the party a 70 percent chance to take the White House against just 30 for the Republicans.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Jim Vian


Get the word out! Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton is legally disqualified to be POTUS! No matter the protection or cover-up by President Obama or his appointed Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, and backed by the progressive liberal left media machine, we the people should demand that the FBI indict Hillary Clinton for her security violations just as astutely as they have many others for even lesser degrees of violation. This one issue when justly exposed will totally crush her presidential bid and should even send her to prison!

Hillary violating several security regulations protecting the dissemination of top secret materials legally impugns prison! For her to say “there were no e-mails marked classified” but later it was found that they were at the time of their exposure on her private server, proves her to be totally incompetent to be POTUS because as POTUS, or in her case as Secretary of State, it was her official responsibility to know classified material by her own assessment even if it was not marked as such! In fact, during the time of her confirmation hearings as Secretary of State, she signed affidavits affirming that she understood and accepted that responsibility. And she can not use as defense that “there was no intent,” because she did intentionally set up a non security compliant private server for her own convenience of handling official government material of any security classification.

Security regulations are written as life and death edicts, so if the FBI doesn’t indict her for her violations, they will be setting a legal precedent that in future security violations similar to this in any way, the FBI can make no charge! In other words, any future government official could use a non security compliant server to conduct official government business of any security classification and in any department, whether as Secretary of State, Secretary of Homeland Security, or even in the Department of Defense, because there is no departmental differentiation in respect to the applicable security regulations.

Case closed!

Ian Sgt

I had my 6 year old check your math. Clinton has 45.5 average and Trump 40.75. Either someone is an idiot or they are trying to make Trump look worse.

Anthony Bennett


RealClearPolitics includes polls in their averages that were not listed here for the sake of readability on mobile devices.

Discuss on Facebook