Faithless Electors Switching to Hillary: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

TOPSHOT - US Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton pauses as she makes a concession speech after being defeated by Republican President-elect Donald Trump, in New York on November 9, 2016. / AFP / JEWEL SAMAD (Photo credit should read JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)

Hillary Clinton pauses as she makes a concession speech after being defeated by Republican President-elect Donald Trump, in New York on November 9, 2016. (Getty)

Donald Trump won the Electoral College and is the president-elect. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote.

Is there any scenario at all through which Hillary could still become president? Enter the “Faithless Elector” scenario.

“Faithless Electors,” according to, “are members of the Electoral College who, for whatever reason, do not vote for their party’s designated candidate.” In other words, electors bound for Trump could just change over to Clinton or not vote.

It’s a highly improbable scenario because Trump leads the Electoral College by so much, but that hasn’t stopped millions of people from embracing it as a last-ditch effort to prevent a President Trump from becoming the Leader of the Free World. At any rate, what hasn’t been improbable about this election?

You can get a full list of each state’s electors here. In some states, they are party activists, making it a far tougher and more remote task that they could flip.

Here’s what you need to know:

1. Millions of People Have Signed a Petition Asking the Electors to Switch or Abstain

Donald Trump Obama Meet at White House, Trump-Obama Oval Office Meeting, Photos of Obama Trump at White House

Inauguration Day is not until January 20, 2017. Trump has already met with President Barack Obama. (Getty)

Over 3.6 million people have signed a petition on asking electors to pick Clinton when the Electoral College meets on December 19 to cast its ballots (The U.S. Congress meets in joint session to count the electoral votes on January 6; Inauguration Day is January 20).

The petition notes, “Mr. Trump is unfit to serve. His scapegoating of so many Americans, and his impulsivity, bullying, lying, admitted history of sexual assault, and utter lack of experience make him a danger to the Republic.”

According to the National Conference on State Legislatures, the Electoral College “was established by Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution and modified by the 12th and 23rd Amendments. The Electoral College consists of a total of 538 members, one for each U.S. senator and representative, and three additional electors representing the District of Columbia.”

The NCSL adds: “Each state has a number of electoral votes equal to the combined total of its congressional delegation, and each state legislature is free to determine the method it will use to select its own electors.”

2. There Have Been Faithless Electors Before in American History

The phrase "Not My President" has been used at all of the anti-Trump rallies, and it has also been turned into a popular Twitter hashtag. Many of those taking to the streets feel they need to take a stand against Trump and make it known that he does not represent them and their beliefs. While most of the protesters accept that Trump won, they say that the Electoral College system is unfair, as Hillary Clinton actually received more popular votes than Donald Trump did. (Getty)

The phrase “Not My President” has been used at all of the anti-Trump rallies, and it has also been turned into a popular Twitter hashtag. (Getty)

The New York Post noted, “According to the Constitution, chosen electors of the Electoral College are the real people who will vote for president, when they meet on December 19 in their respective state capitals.”

Since the advent of the Electoral College, there have been 157 faithless electors. According to, “71 of these votes were changed because the original candidate died before the day on which the Electoral College cast its votes. Three of the votes were not cast at all as three electors chose to abstain from casting their electoral vote for any candidate. The other 82 electoral votes were changed on the personal initiative of the elector.”

The National Conference of State Legislatures says “the last time an elector crossed party lines was in 1972, when an elector nominated by the Republican Party cast his ballot for the Libertarian ticket.”

The challenge for Clinton supporters: Because of Trump’s lead in the Electoral College, a swarm of electors would need to do so.

3. It’s Illegal in Some States for Electors to Switch but the Penalty Is Not Severe

BOSTON, MA - NOVEMBER 09: Protesters hold up signs and yell during a protest against the elction of Donald Trump in the Boston Common on November 9, 2016 in Boston, Massachusetts. Trump defeated Democrat Hillary Clinton in an upset to become the 45th president. (Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)

Protesters hold up signs and yell during a protest against the elction of Donald Trump in the Boston Common on November 9, 2016 in Boston, Massachusetts. (Getty)

FairVote says 21 states “still do not require their members of the Electoral College to vote for their party’s designated candidate” and the 29 states that do impose low penalties for violating the rule, including fines and misdemeanors charges. FairVote even has a list of past faithless electors.

According to Inverse, “The precedent in most previous cases has just been to charge faithless electors with a misdemeanor and slap them with a fine, usually $1,000.” Inverse argues that the best way to encourage faithless electors is to raise money for their legal fees.

Here is the list of states that attempt to bind their electors to sticking with the candidate their state voted for, according to the State Conference of State Legislatures:

Alabama, Nebraska, Alaska, Nevada, California, New Mexico, Colorado, North Carolina, Connecticut, Oklahoma, Delaware, Ohio, District of Columbia, Oregon, Florida, South Carolina, Hawaii, Tennessee, Maine, Utah, Massachusetts, Vermont, Minnesota, Virginia, Michigan, Washington, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Montana, Wyoming.

The SCSL says, in addition to laws that require electors to vote as pledged, in some states, a faithless elector can be replaced with another elector. “No elector has ever been penalized or replaced — nor have these laws been fully vetted by the courts,” the SCSL adds.

4. Some Electors Were Already Threatening to Become “Faithless”

election results, early election results, VoteCastr wrong, polls wrong, Slate election, 2016 exit polls, 2016 Presidential Election, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Gary Johnson, Jill Stein, Florida election results, Ohio election results

The site says the last time the nation saw a faithless elector was in 2004 when an anonymous Minnesota elector voted for John Edwards when he or she was pledged to vote for John Kerry. Some people thought that was done by mistake, though.

Before the 2016 presidential election, Time Magazine talked to some electors who said they would become faithless electors. Some of them were Bernie Sanders voters.

However, Vox points out that, when a candidate wins a state, his or her party nominates the electors. Vox cites the example of Alaska, where there is a Republican Party “nominated elector slate there — former Gov. Sean Parnell, Jacqueline Tupou, and Carolyn Leman.”

That means the party’s electors would need to turn on the Republican president-elect. It would be shocking, to say the least, and highly unlikely. After all, why would Republicans want to give the election to Hillary (although, it’s been a shocking election from start to finish, and there’s no love lost between Trump and some factions of the GOP. Then again, everyone loves a winner.)

5. Trump Has a Large Lead in the Electoral College, Making This Scenario Tougher to Pull Off

Donald Trump Hall of Presidents, Donald Trump Disney world, Donald Trump robot

Donald Trump. (Getty)

Trump’s large lead in the Electoral College makes this scenario a lot harder to imagine. The New York Times’ electoral map says Trump has 290 electoral votes to 228 for Clinton; Michigan was still listed as up for grabs with its 16 additional electoral votes.

The New York Times lists these popular vote totals for each candidate:

Clinton: 60,839,497
Trump: 60,265,847

Clinton’s popular vote tally now exceeds 61 million, according to a popular election tracker by Dave Wasserman and Cook Political Report.

The Electoral College is designed so that candidates must try to appeal to the hearts and minds of people in every state instead of only focusing on the few most populous areas.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



I would bet everything I own, if the election results indicated the popular votes would win and Shrillary won the electoral votes, there is no way in hell she would be fighting for any kind of popular vote instead of the electoral. It would never cross her mind. The only thing on her mind is sitting in that oval office in the big white house. My only comfort is if she got there she wouldn’t be there long. The word impeachment comes to mind. Luckily, neither one is going to happen. 😈

Glen Walters

The electoral members who switch, should be called faithful and promised a seat in heaven .
I am hopeful that the families of the Members of the Electoral College can get them to man up and do the right thing and vote for Sec. Clinton who has almost 2 million more popular votes and is much more qualified in all areas..
There’s only one group of people who can – very theoretically – stop the result of the Presidential election. And millions of people are calling on them to do so.
A petition arguing that the result of the election should be overturned has been signed by nearly 4.5 million people, all of whom are asking that Hillary Clinton becomes president.
Those behind the petition are arguing that since Sec. Clinton is easily winning the popular vote – by as many as millions of ballots – she should be elected president. It also argues that Donald Trump is not fit to be the president and so shouldn’t be allowed to take his position. Trump is talking about living in his 100 million$ penthouse as the Whitehouse is not good enough for him. He is considering taking a victory tour for his deplorable, misinformed low information voters, who many don’t have a pot to pi-s in and Think a racist bigoted man like Trump gives a damn about them. All believing fake news on Facebook, Fox and people like Limbaugh. His campaign proved he wasn’t qualified and his transition debacle only goes to confirmed he don’t know what the fu-k he is doing. But the faithful will come out in droves to see their bigoted king no doubt if he goes on tour..

Brenda Coloney

Hilary did not possibly win the popular vote as the lying media is stating. Trump won over 3000 counties and Hilary won only 400. Numbers are at least. Also, Hilary has 3.2 million votes that were cast by illegals. Better tally again.


You clearly have no idea who this Hildebeast really is do you? Heaven? You really think God in heaven abides liars and cheats like the Hildebeast? All your vitriolic vernacular and profanity aside,……WOW! PS. there are not millions of people in your movement as you think there are, and Soros money will soon run dry.

Earl Grover

They forgot two”facts” Trump also won 30 states and take away the huge lead Hillary has in CA and Trump is the winner in the popular vote too. This is why we need the electoral college. If we had the PV the candidates would camp out in large populated states while the smaller populated states would get left behind…and that is a FACT you can take to the bank


Typical libtard mentality, if you don’t get the results you want, throw out the electoral process the United States has used since its founding.If the shoe was on the other foot, Hillary would be expounding on the virtues of the electoral college system.


I understant that the Electoral College was a political scheme to attempt at balacing political power for the less polular states in exchange for their support to the newly written Constitution. Frankly, a clever and heart felt plan for our new nation, but we have it now and naively discussing or hoping that we can undo it or its resultsand to have a majority support a candiddate who may not have carried their state is well into the swamp of disbelief and cartoonish dreaming! I voted for Hillary – I think that my nation may never have had such a threat as Trump and his un-disclosed aims and plans and/or allegiances, but I and the “Stupids” voted and I apparently lost – as did America in my view. Frankly I DIDN’T work or support my candidate enough and now the nation of my children and grand-children is a Piñata and a long haired idiot is holding the stick!


Get on with your lives,stop acting like spoiled brats,we put up with Obama for eight years,like it or not Donald J. Trump will be our new president,he won the electoral college.Hillary lost, instead of rejection lets get all support him and give him a chance


I am reading some of the comments and seems to me the persons making hateful statements are republicans. Yes, Hillary a lot of them (not all) are deplorable.

Eduardo Salazar

Difficult? Borderline impossible. Example: Chris Suprun, if he follows through, can be rejected and replaced by either the other Texas Electors or Gov. Abbott under Texas Law. Every state decision ever made in any state has required pledged electors to vote for the pledged candidate, comparing them to a messenger service. In addition, Congress under USC 3 Section 15 can, by simple majority vote of both Houses, reject any faithless votes and make them conform to the actual election results in the jurisdiction from which the elector comes.

Discuss on Facebook