Early Voting Results: Who Leads Final State-by-State on Nov. 6?

Florida election ballot, Voting in Florida 2016, Florida candidates 2016

A voting sign points early voters to the polling station at the Hillsbourgh County Supervisor of Elections office on October 24, 2016 in St. Petersburg, Florida. (Getty)

Polls tightened across a series of battleground states, with many now virtual ties, but early voting patterns provide some predictions.

Early voting patterns, with election day now here, indicated positives for both sides when all was said and done (the statistics in this article were updated early on November 8). Republicans fared well in Florida and North Carolina; Democrats are doing well in Nevada and Colorado. Hispanic turnout is surging in some key battleground states, helping Clinton. In other battleground states, though, African-American turnout is down, concerning Democrats.

See below for a RealClearPolitics electoral college map with the battlegrounds shaded gray. Those are the states where people are most closely studying early voting patterns.


Republicans say they are doing better than Mitt Romney’s 2012 early voting numbers “when combining ballot requests, return rates and early in-person voting” in Florida, Iowa, Michigan and North Carolina, said The Los Angeles Times. Other states, though, like Nevada, have early voting trends that are ominous for Trump.

A mixed bag in the battleground states likely helps Clinton, who leads in more of those states’ polls going into the November 8 general election and who can afford to lose more states than Trump, who has to basically run the table in deadlocked states and possibly upset Clinton in a state she was expected to win (like Pennsylvania or Colorado). Florida is pretty much a must-win state for both candidates, although there are ways each can win without it (more for Clinton).

There are limitations as to how much early voting can tell us. No states break down early votes by candidate. However, some states do break down early voting by party affiliation (others don’t). This, too, has limitations. It can’t tell us how unaffiliated voters broke or the degree of cross-over voting, or voting for third party candidates, and this has been a non-traditional race. However, it can tell us something, especially when juxtaposed against 2012 early voting patterns or geography (Democrats usually lead in early voting, so it’s the comparison to 2012 that matters most). Nearly 40 million Americans had cast early votes as of November 6. One study found Clinton leading 9 percent in overall early voting, but, again, it’s state-by-state battleground comparatives to 2012 that matter most.

Not all states allow robust early voting. Robust early voting helps Clinton because Trump suffered in the polls in many states in mid-October in the midst of the sexual assault allegations against him but has recovered in recent weeks, the last week especially. He is now aggressively campaigning in some states without robust early voting, such as Michigan, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania. Those states only allow early voting for limited reasons.

Here’s what you need to know about early voting results as of November 6 in some of the most important battleground states:


Statistics for November 7 out of Florida show, according to the Secretary of State:

Vote by mail:

Republican 1,047,119
Democrat 980,440
Other 64,338
No party affiliation 457,756

Voted early (in person)

Republican 1,425,312
Democrat 1,580,003
Other 89,998
Unaffiliated 779,639

Here are the totals:

Total ballots cast early in Florida by mail and in person: 6,424,595 (that’s almost half of all voters, and it’s an increase over past elections.)

Republicans: 2,472,431 (38.5%)
Democrats: 2,560,443 (39.9%)

Democrats cast slightly more early votes overall. However, it’s unclear how unaffiliated voters will break (but polls have indicated they are breaking more for Trump in Florida).

It’s the comparison to past patterns that matters, though. In 2008, according to CNN, Democrats also led Republicans in early voting. Black share of the electorate has dropped since then, although Latino turnout is up, said CNN.

Politico said Democrats led early voting returns in 2012 43% to 40%. In 2012, Barack Obama won Florida by the slimmest of margins – 0.9%. Thus, a drop off in the Democratic advantage in early voting bodes well for the GOP.

The New York Times says that Hispanic turnout surged in Florida in early voting by 3 percent, making up 15% of the early vote in 2016 and 12% of the electorate in 2012.

According to The Huffington Post, overall, “Slightly more registered Democrats than Republicans have voted in Florida thus far, but Democrats’ advantage is lower than it was at this point in 2012 ― and historically, more Republicans vote on Election Day in Florida.” However, Florida’s early voting tallies showed surges in Democratic strongholds, the site said. Furthermore, it depends on how independents broke, and The Huffington Post said a bigger portion of Florida independents is now non-white.


According to the Nevada Secretary of State, here are the percentage breakdowns for early votes in Nevada:

Democrat: 40.62%
Republican: 35.43%
Other: 23.95%

Trump has taken the lead in recent polls out of this battleground state.

The Democrats had an edge in 2012, too. They led 44 percent with Republicans at 37 percent. That means that Democrats this year have an edge in early voting of +5.19%. In 2012, they had an edge of +7, so Democrats don’t have as much of an early voting lead in Nevada now as they did in the last presidential election.

However, Obama won Nevada in 2012 52.3% to 45.7%.

Nevada reporter Jon Ralston has been analyzing early voting patterns. He’s found such good news for Clinton as to declare the race over because of voting patterns in key Democratic counties, including a surge in Hispanic voters. This is what he wrote on November 5, “Let me answer the question both sides are asking: Could Trump still win Nevada? Well…yes, BUT: Let me remind you of the math: Trump would need to be holding 90 percent of the GOP base and Clinton would have to be losing 15-20 percent of hers and he would have to be winning indies for him to be competitive. Let me be clear: None of those things are likely.”

KTVN-TV reported that “the number of ballots cast before Election Tuesday was up in 2016 compared to 2012, but there are also more than 200,000 active voters now compared to then.” The television station said Democrats had a higher turnout in 2012, and pointed out there is no way to know what percentage of people will cross over and vote for a candidate from a different party.

Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, and Michigan

All eyes are on Pennsylvania because it would be a huge pick up for Trump and polls have tightened to the margin of error (with Clinton still maintaining a slight lead.) However, early voting is very limited in Pennsylvania. Thus, only 5% of the state early voted in 2012. Early voting is not much of a factor in Pennsylvania in contrast to a state like Nevada, where 69% or so of the state early votes. That helps Trump in these states, though, since he’s recovered in many polls since mid October.

The same is true of Michigan and New Hampshire. They do not allow early voting for all. Clinton leads in Michigan and Trump in New Hampshire, although the Trump lead is in the margin of error and the race has tightened in both states.


The Denver Post has a ballot tracker that shows the following early voting tallies for November 6:

Republicans 652,380 (35.2%)
Democrats 645,020 (34.8%)
Unaffiliated 527,706
Libertarian 17,359
Other 9,564
Total: 1,852,029

The Huffington Post, after analyzing 2014 midterm election data, said, “Republicans need at least a 7 point registration advantage to be competitive” in early voting – something they did not come close to achieving.

This is good news for Democrats. The polling average for Colorado is in the margin for error, but Clinton still leads. In 2012, Democrats had 35 percent of early votes and Republicans had 37 percent.

Thus, in 2012, Republicans had a 2 percentage point early voting edge. This year, Democrats have an edge of .3%. And remember Obama won Colorado 51.2% to 46.5% in 2012. It’s unclear how unaffiliated voters would break, of course. That could be a big wildcard. But so far early voting tallies don’t provide any indication that Trump is outperforming Mitt Romney’s numbers in Colorado.

North Carolina

In 2012, Democrats had 48 percent of early votes and Republicans had 32 percent. That was a +16 point edge. Showing the limitations on using early voting as a predictor of election outcomes, Romney won the state 50.39% to 48.35%.

This year, North Carolina is reporting that 3,183,492 people have already voted as of November 8. Here’s the partisan breakdown:

Democrat: 41.7%
Republican: 31.9%
Unaffiliated: 26.1%
Libertarian: 0.32%

That’s a 9.8 percentage point Democrat early voting edge, but that’s down more than 6 percentage points from 2012, which was a year Republicans won the state. Thus, early voting tallies bode well for Trump, who’s pushed the North Carolina polling to a dead heat in the past week.

CNN also found that early voting for Democrats has not matched Obama’s pace, whereas Trump has outperformed Romney’s, adding, “Independent voters came out this time in droves. They cast nearly 810,000 votes, up a whopping 42% from 2012.” It’s unclear how they will break, but Trump has done well with Independent voters in some states.

There’s some ugliness behind the numbers. In North Carolina, 17 counties controversially decreased the number of early voting locations, said NBC News; this has resulted in long lines at some polling places and lower early voting tallies. NBC said one county, Guilford County, which houses the largely black city of Greensboro, “cut early voting locations from 16 to just one.” This has resulted in declining early voting totals in North Carolina overall. A federal judge has ordered North Carolina to restore purged voter registrations as the result of an NAACP lawsuit.


The Salt Lake Tribute reported that Democrats have an edge in turnout, although not in raw numbers because Utah is such a conservative state.

Republican: 39.9% (268,259 votes)

Democrat: 45.4% (72,356 votes)

Unaffiliated: 33.7% (177,467 votes)

In Utah, 1.5 million people are registered to vote. According to the Utah Secretary of State:
Republican 720,354
Democrat 176,687
Unaffiliated 615,002

When you see the data above, it’s hard to see why some have been talking about Utah as a possible state that could spoil the electoral college math for Trump. However, independent candidate Evan McMullin, who is from Utah, has been running well in some polls. Still, Trump has recovered in polling and leads an average of more than 10%. Early voting has declined in Utah, showing some voters may be waiting until the last minute to decide.


Final early voting tallies for Georgia shattered records there:

Georgia doesn’t break down early votes by party affiliation. However, as with some other states, Clinton’s concern is that fewer African-Americans are voting early.

According to CNN, as of November 1, 1.5 million votes had already been cast in the state. Of those, 31 percent were from African American voters, a decrease from 36 percent at the same time in 2012. NBC reported November 7, though, that black turnout ended up increasing slightly.

Clinton has made Georgia competitive, although Trump leads in recent polls there.


As with Georgia, Wisconsin does not release party affiliation of early voters.

In Wisconsin, 775,560 cast early ballots.

That shattered a record. In 2012, a total of 664,597 early votes were cast in Wisconsin.

Geography bodes well for Clinton as liberal Dane County and swing areas in the Fox Valley drove the increases, The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel said.


There’s good news for Republicans in Iowa. CNN says Iowa early votes by Democrats were about 3 percent off their 2012 pace.

Democrats lead in early voting in Iowa overall, but they did in 2012 too, and they have a smaller edge. Overall early vote numbers in Iowa have decreased as well, said CNN.

The Cedar Rapids Gazette reported November 7 that Democratic early voting had fallen off by 8 percent whereas Republican was up by 1.


Ohio also doesn’t release party affiliation of early voters. However, CNN says there’s also good news for Republicans in Ohio, reporting that early voting in Democratic areas was less than Barack Obama in 2012.

The Clinton campaign was offering free tacos to early voters, which wasn’t illegal because the tacos were available to all, said Cleveland.com.

In one key Ohio Democratic county where Clinton needs to win big, “early-vote requests by Democrats in Cuyahoga County, however, are down 35 percent compared with the same point in 2012, and ballots returned are off by 31 percent,” said Bloomberg, although Democratic early voting picked up for Clinton slightly but still off Obama’s pace. In the end, according to Cleveland.com, voting dropped off 16% in a Democratic county that Clinton needs to win, but overall early voting rose in the state.


Hispanic turnout was up in early voting in some key states, such as Arizona (New Mexico also). According to The Huffington Post, 1.6 million people cast early votes, up from 2012, and represents more than 70 percent of the state. Registered Republicans have a 6.3 percentage point lead, but there was no 2012 figure available for comparison, said the news site.

Trump has recovered in the polls and leads Arizona in polling averages.


In Virginia, the home of Clinton running mate Tim Kaine, there was good news for the ticket as early voting rose 18%, an increase driven largely by northern Virginia, a Democratic area. Clinton leads in Virginia by a fairly comfortable margin.

Read more about Donald Trump and Melania in Spanish at AhoraMismo.com:




Whatever happens MERRY CHRISTMAS Mr. Trump…Madame President… and all the citizens of the great USA and of the world. Also MERRY CHRISTMAS… Mr. Pence..Vice President Kaine… Mr Guilliani…Mr ??? Governor of New Jersey and the blond lady who always defends Mr Trump…Ms Con???.. 
It was a good ride and thanks for the exciting campaign


Tbe author is trying to sway that Hillary is leading and assuming the dem votes arnet crossing over despite many polls and groups are out there that dems are turning to trump in some areas. NC, Florida, Iowa, Ohio look very good for trump as the numbers just arent there for Hillary. Colorado despite what the author is saying, she is leading… is def too close to call with dems only up like 7,000 votes ans massive independents voting. That was a terrible error on the writer on this article to assume she is leading Colorado. If anything its a dead heat. If trump wins PA or michgian it will be over… look out for those two states. I hope and pray fraud will be controlled. Massive frauds have akready happened by dems and they have Preaidsnt Obama and dems blessing to do so.

Ferdinand Rodríguez Berríos

Here is a fact for you: in 2012, Dems closed Early and Absentee voting in FL with 140K advantage, This year is only 88K. Obama won FL for less than 80K. This explain why the Hillary Campaign is feeling uneasy.


I bought brand new RED Ferreri by working ONline work. Six month ago i hear from my friend that she is working some online job and making more then 98$/hr i can’t beleive. But when i start this job i have too beleived herNow i am also making 96$/hr if you want to try just check this out……

Please copy the link below❥❥❥❥❥❥❥ MomJob70.Tk


Jason really wants a lying corrupt globalist married to a sexual predator in the white house and he wants the world to know it.


Such a typlcal Trumpanzee rant . . . all sorts of slurs and lies, but not facts and documentation to back it up. Geesh, sure hope you’re never on a jury.


Ahhh, as opposed to a spoiled, sleep deprived megalomaniac & a bimbo Barbie doll practicing plagiarist ? Gimme a break

Steven Hayden

Your right on . Hillary is not Obama to African Americans or to independents. Hillary is such a bad candidate she pushes down democrats early voting lead in many states. When 81 percent think a candidate is unethical or illegal. they are not getting elected. Kim Jong Un has better reputation for honesty that Crooked Hillary.


What’s with the third-grade name calling . . . I mean “Crooked Hillary . . . REALLY? I expect more from an 8-year-old! Sad, man, sad!!

Steven Hayden

Poor Frederick Mendonca has fixation with sexual body parts. Was Fredericka a victim of sexual abuse? Get help . Please .


Stevie, only an a-hole, or a sexual predator himself would make a joke about sexual assault. People such as yourself are known to keep it in the family!!

David S

More people are crossing party lines to vote for Clinton than to vote for Trump. One poll, questioning people who voted, found that 28% of registered Republicans voted for Hillary vs 6% of Democrats who said they voted for Trump.

Hugh V Eubanks (@Curezilla)

A completely over skewed MSNBC poll even the author admits is way off. Not to mention of the 718 people surveyed, only 311 claimed early voting. But I am sure this highly accurate poll is completely on point. After all, Trumps real name was posted in the story. If they are close enough to the campaign to know he is really Trumpy McMoron, it has to be legit. Right? :D

Mary P

I consider myself Independent, so I vote the lesser of two evils. In the past I have voted Democrat for President (mostly – one exception, Perrot). This is the first time I have EVER considered a Republican nominee because I am tired of politics as usual (as I am sure most people are). We need a serious third choice. Regardless, I will NOT vote for Hillary. I have never liked her.


Sorry, Mary P . . . I appreciate and share much of your frustration, and am a long-time Independent myself, but I just can’t support the KKK’s candidate.


But you can support the Communist Party of America, Mrs. Clintion? Are you that shallow that a certain organization supports a candidate, Vote for the person and the parties platform. If you happen to be Pro-Life than you can NOT support the National Democratic Ticket, since the Dems support late term abortion and abortion in general.

I agree Mr. Trump is not my ideal candidate, but I also do not want another four or eight years of Obama, I would have hoped that Mrs. Clinton would have offered us a different look than another eight years of Obama’ policies. The Affordable Health Care is a great social idea for providing proper health care to low income, unfortunately it does not work and the new price increases will only HURT the MIDDLE CLASS with further burden of this failed health system. Then you have Pres. Obama’s and his current and former Judicial System that passes judgement on civil matters before all the evidence is in or a trial has started and lately the crowning policy touch of allowing certain persons to use bathroom facilities depending on how they view their gender, so a unscrupulous person can say I am female and use the opportunity to violate your daughter, only if that person has had a mandatory sex change, they should not object to that. If they do then I don’t trust their motives. I think that would have been a logical policy to have considered, but in this political correct world that Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton live in the ceiling is now the floor, the world is turned upside down and we allow foreign rioters to attack our embassy and murder our ambassador without reprisals and this is the thinking process of our current President and I assume Mrs. Clinton since she supports Pres. Obama.

There are usually two sides to every coin or story, but in this case it is a two sided coin with the same face and similar global viewpoint. We may not like Mr. Trump but we do need a change in Washington and the way business is done. The majority should rule and not the special interests or PC correct viewpoints, without violating our Constitutional rights.


“I vote the lesser of two evils>” Whoa, I’m an Independent too, but that’s way too cynical for me.


What poll was that? CNN? That is way off, you need to look at the facts


keep “praying” that won’t help……….stump is going to lose


I’d like to know where all this ‘massive’ voter fraud is happening. Please don’t point me to just ‘Google’ it. There hasn’t been one reputable news agency that has had any reputable pundit say anything other than voter fraud is so minor, it’s never worth even talking about. If you get your news from disreputable sources, then you will probably be very disappointed. I will say on a personal note that I am a dem. and voted for “her!” but I won’t necessarily be disappointed if he wins. I just couldn’t bring myself to vote for him but she makes me want to vomit. I almost didn’t vote at all. It’s all been so sickening but I felt an obligation to. I figure if she wins and in four years, if the conservatives can come up with something, anything that doesn’t have scandal associated with him/her, I’ll probably cast my vote for him/her. I’m switching to Independent right after this election.