Antwon Rose: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

antwon rose

Facebook Antwon Rose.

A 17-year-old boy who was fatally shot by police in East Pittsburgh has been identified as Antwon Rose II, WPXI-TV reports. Rose was killed Tuesday night while running from a car during a traffic stop. The shooting was caught on video by a witness and showed Rose exiting the car with another person and running away from officers before shots were fired.

Rose, of Rankin, was taken to the hospital, where he was pronounced dead at 9:19 p.m., the Allegheny County Police Department said in a press release Tuesday night. The investigation into the shooting is ongoing. The officer who shot Rose has been identified as 30-year-old Michael Rosfeld. He had just been hired as part-time employee of the East Pittsburgh Police Department and was in his first day on patrol, according to KDKA-TV. He has been put on leave. Police said two firearms were found in the car Rose fled from, but investigators said they did not find a gun near Rose after he was shot. Witnesses said he was not armed and had his back to officers when he was shot.

The shooting happened Tuesday evening in East Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a borough of about 2,000 residents in Allegheny County that is 15 minutes outside of the city of Pittsburgh. The incident began with another shooting in neighboring North Braddock, according to police.

On Friday, multiple Pittsburgh news stations reported that there was video showing Rose firing a gun during the earlier shooting that led to the traffic stop and that gunshot residue was found on his hands. The news stations also reported that a gun magazine was found on him. But the Allegheny County Police Department have said those reports are false:

“The Allegheny County Police Department (ACPD) continues to receive inquiries related to reports
from police sources that 1) a video of the drive-by shooting in North Braddock shows Antwon Rose
firing a gun; and, 2) that gunshot residue has been found on Antwon Rose’s hands. According to Lieutenant Andrew Schurman of the Allegheny County Police Department’s Homicide Unit, both reports are false. While ACPD does have a video showing the North Braddock incident, that video does NOT show Antwon Rose firing a gun. The information about gunshot residue is also false. Crime Lab reports are still pending and have not yet been issued,” the department said in a press release. “The District Attorney’s office also concurs and affirms the information provided by Lt. Schurman.”

Allegheny County POlice Superintendent Coleman McDonough added, “We caution the media about providing irresponsible information from sources that are not verified. Once published, such false information can be widely spread. We share your interest in providing answers to the many questions in our community, and are working expeditiously to gather all of the available information and detail so that it can be reviewed, and answers provided. We are not releasing additional information at this time to protect the integrity of the investigation, and ask for your cooperation and understanding of what we require as police to complete the independent investigation of this incident.”

The shooting death of Rose has sparked outrage in the community and across the country. A rally was held Wednesday night. Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown tweeted Wednesday, “Rip Antwane Rose (sp.) sad day in Pittsburgh crazy.”

Here’s what you need to know:


1. The Video Shows Rose Running From Officers With His Back to Them & Dropping to the Ground as Shots Are Heard

The video shows officers stopping a car on a residential street. Two people get out of the car and run and shots are then fired. One person, who has his back to the officers, appears to fall to the ground after the shots were heard. You can watch the video above. The video shows the shooting footage twice, once zoomed in.

After two shots are heard, the person recording the video gasps and can be heard saying, “why are they shooting at him? … Why are they shooting? All they did was run and they’re shooting at them?”

Another video posted on Facebook shows a person being taken into an ambulance and receiving chest compressions from a paramedic. You can watch that video, which is graphic, below:

A witness told WTAE-TV that she saw the harrowing scene unfold from her porch. She told the news station she saw officers approaching the car with their guns drawn. The officers handcuffed the driver of the car and that is when the two passengers opened their doors and took off running. She then heard the shots.

Police said the officer fired three shots and Rose was hit three times. McDonough said he was shot in various places, but wouldn’t confirm where he was hit.

Allegheny County Police Superintendent Coleman McDonough said he “briefly saw” the video of the shooting. “It’s important, however it has to be taken in the context of the entire investigation. It’s a snapshot in time and while important, it will be factored in to the larger totality of the investigation.”

McDonough added, “I understand in today’s atmosphere any time a young man is killed there’s cause for outrage in some areas. However, I would urge people to give us time to conduct an objective investigation, to gather facts. As you know, social media is so prolific now, some of the initial postings on social media that came out directly after this incident were inaccurate and inflammatory. So I would urge that people in the community give us a chance to conduct an investigation and I guarantee that’s what they will get from the Allegheny Police.”

McDonough said there are times when shooting someone in the back can be justified.

“It’s very complex, there are a lot of dynamics. There is something called a reactionary gap between the time a human perceives a threat and is able to act on it. Things happen, people tuirn around and things. I’m not saying that any of that applies to this situation because it’s too early and we can’t make judgements. Ultimately, our findings will go to the district attorney and he will make that judgement whether or not this was a justified use of force by a police officer.”

McDonough said he believes police gave a verbal order to Rose before the shots were fired. He said the officer was conducting a “felony traffic stop,” and ordered the driver out and had him “prone” on the ground. He also gave a command to the other occupants and that is when they fled from the vehicle, McDonough said.


2. The Officer Who Shot & Killed Rose Was Sworn-In as a Part-Time Patrolman Just an Hour Before the Shooting

Sources told KDKA-TV that the officer who shot and killed Rose, Michael Rosfeld, was sworn in an as a part-time officer at a East Pittsburgh council meeting about an hour before the shooting. The meeting was held at 7 p.m. Tuesday and the shooting occurred just after 8:40 p.m. The officer was hired to work part time for the East Pittsburgh Police Department.

Rosfeld, 30, had been hired by East Pittsburgh three weeks before the shooting and was officially sworn in at a meeting that started 90 minutes prior to Rose’s death. He has been an officer in Allegheny County since 2011, previously working for Harmarville, Oakmont and the University of Pittsburgh police departments, the news station reports. The Post-Gazette reports he also worked in Blawnox. The University of Pittsburgh website shows he worked for five years for its police department.

East Pittsburgh Mayor Louis Payne told the Post-Gazette the officer was treated at the hospital for “shock” after the shooting. Payne said East Pittsburgh Police Chief Lori Fruncek, who is his daughter, spent several hours with the officer after the incident.

Police were investigating another shooting in a nearby borough, North Braddock, when they stopped the car Antwon Rose was in, according to a press release.

“At approximately 8:20 PM, County 9-1-1 received multiple calls reporting that shots were fired and that a male had been shot in the 800 block of Kirkpatrick Avenue,” police said. “Callers reported that a vehicle was seen fleeing the scene, and were able to provide a description of that vehicle. North Braddock Police and paramedics responded and found a 22-year-old male who had been shot. He was been transported to a local trauma center where he was treated and released.”

Police said during that incident the 22-year-old man was shot in the abdomen. The shooter fired nine .40 caliber rounds at the victim from a passing vehicle and the victim also returned fire.

According to Allegheny County Police:

Information on the vehicle that fled the North Braddock scene was put out over the air for neighboring police departments to assist/respond. An East Pittsburgh police officer saw a vehicle matching the description on Grandview Avenue which also had ballistics damage to the rear window. The officer stopped the vehicle near Grandview and Howard Street in East Pittsburgh. The officer took the driver into custody. While he was putting the driver into handcuffs, two other occupants ran from the car. One individual – a 17-year-old male – was shot by police. He was transported to McKeesport Hospital where he was declared deceased. Further information on the deceased, including name, will be released by the Allegheny County Office of the Medical Examiner once formal identification has been made and the next of kin notified.

Rose was shot about 8:40 p.m.

The 20-year-old driver, who was handcuffed before the shooting, was arrested. He has not been identified. The driver was released after being interviewed by detectives and has not been charged. The driver told police he worked as a jitney, an unlicensed cab, and was working in that role Tuesday night, according to the Post-Gazette. Police confirmed the driver had worked as a jitney in the past.

At a press conference Wednesday, Allegheny County Police Superintendent Coleman McDonough said he was confident the vehicle that was pulled over was the one used in the shooting. He said it matched the description given by witnesses and had damage to the back window that was possibly caused by gunshots returned by the shooting victim during the first incident.

Police are still searching for the third person who fled from the car. “ACPD Superintendent Coleman McDonough is asking that he turn himself in so that he can give a comprehensive description of what occurred this evening,” police said in the press release.


3. Rose Was a Student at Woodland Hills High School Last Year, Where He Was an ‘Excellent Student,’ & Would Have Been Entering His Senior Year

Antwon Rose was 17. There was some initial confusion over his age, with witnesses saying a 13-year-old boy was killed by police. According to WPXI-TV, Rose was a student last year at Woodland Hills High School in Pittsburgh.

“The Woodland Hills School District acknowledges the gun violence that occurred recently within the neighborhoods that our district serves,” Assistant Superintendent Licia Lentz said in a statement. “We are urging the communities to help us call a ceasefire to end this gun violence to keep our community safe for our children … Our thoughts are with the victim’s family and the entire Woodland Hills Community.”

Superintendent Al Johnson told the New York Times that Rose, “was an excellent student,” who had been taking Advanced Placement classes.

Activist Shaun King posted a photo of Rose on Facebook on Wednesday and wrote, “This is #AntwonRose. Shot in the back and killed yesterday by police in East Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. My friends in the city knew him and his family. We didn’t know it was Antwon who was killed until late last night. Devastating. A wonderful boy.”

King later tweeted he had spoken with Rose’s family, “They are devastated beyond words and have spent the morning at the funeral home.”

The family has hired attorney Lee Merritt to represent them. Merritt issued a statement Wednesday night on behalf of the family:

It is difficult to find justification in the shooting of 17-year-old rising senior high school student Antwon Rose II. From all accounts, he was a generous, hard working and highly promising student. Affirmations of his generosity and spirit and genuine goodheartedness have begun pouring in from all corners of the East Pittsburgh community where he lived.

We know very little about the circumstances surrounding his death at this early stage. We must emphasize that rumors of him being involved in a separate shooting are unsubstantiated. We know that he was not armed at the time he was shot down, that he posed no immediate threat to anyone and that, significantly, the driver of the vehicle he occupied was released from police custody. The officer involved in this shooting had just been sworn into the (East Pittsburgh PD) … (90 minutes) before this encounter. These facts, without more, simply leave very little room to justify the use of deadly force by this officer. Additional information concerning the background of the offending officer and the facts available to him at the time of the shooting is needed as we determine the appropriate action in this matter.

On behalf of the family we thank the community for the generous outpouring of concern and support.

His aunt, Mica Tinsley, told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette she was angered by the video. “They’re not even saying stop,” she told the newspaper. “They just started shooting, and he fell. He didn’t make it far.”

Selena Brooklin, who lives near the scene, told the Post-Gazette she was “outraged” when she saw the video. “Why did they have to shoot him when he is running away? What is the justification for that? There is no justification. There is no answer. You shot a man in the back while he was running away.”

Sherri Monique, 16, who said she was close friends with Rose, told the newspaper, “All I can say is he was a cool person with a good heart. Always there for you no matter what or how hard life got.”

Merritt said Rose’s funeral will be Monday, June 25, at 11 a.m. at Tunnie Funeral Home in Homestead, Pennsylvania. The viewing will be Sunday at the funeral home from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m.


4. He Worked at Kids’ Gymnastics & Fitness Center in Pittsburgh & Volunteered at a Store That Helps People in Need

antwon rose

Antwon Rose.

Rose once worked at a children’s gymnastics and fitness center in Pittsburgh for a summer, its owner, Kimberly Eads Ransom, wrote in a Facebook comment on Wednesday. She said the photo of him circulating on Facebook, showing him smiling next to a little girl, was taken in her gym when he worked there.

“He was fantastic and I have nothing but great things to say about him,” she wrote. “He showed up in a 3 piece suit to his job interview in the middle of July heat in a gym. We loved him. The kids loved him. He was valued and we won’t forget him.”

She told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette he worked at the Pittsburgh Gymnastics Club from July 2015 to July 2016. He worked with children in the after-school program and staffed open gyms and birthday parties, Ransom told the newspaper. “I am committed to just singing his praises as far as his character when I worked with him/. He was just an absolute dream to work with at the gym. All of the kids loved him. The parents loved him. There was just nothing more I could have asked from him.”

Heather Hazen, whose kids attended the gym while he worked there, wrote on Facebook, “He was so great with all the kids. My kids immediately remembered who he was when they saw this picture. Prayers to his family that is no doubt devastated.”

Gisele Barreto Fetterman, who runs several charities in the Pittsburgh area and whose husband, John Fetterman, is the mayor of Braddock and a current candidate for Pennsylvania lieutenant governor, wrote on Facebook that Rose volunteered for her. He worked at Freestore15104, which helps provide goods to people in need.

“No words other than this is the young man who was killed in East Pittsburgh yesterday. Then just 14 and only a few weeks into summer vacation, he wrote us to ask about volunteering at the Freestore and was scheduled to return this summer. His life was just starting, he was part of a wonderful family and he was SO LOVED by so many and he didn’t deserve this,” she wrote on Facebook. She wrote, “this is who he was,” along with a screenshot of an email about how he wanted to volunteer more often.

Fetterman told KDKA-TV, “He was a funny, goofy kid who loved chasing children around the store.”

Duquense Mayor Nickole Nesby wrote on Facebook, “He volunteered for me as well. He prepared excel spreadsheets and scheduled for our Movies in the Park on Friday’s. My heart is broken.”

Nesby added, “Yesterday, I attended the visual for the murdered youth in Duquesne. Afterwards, I was so drained. The gun violence, death, tears and loss of life takes a toll on us all. This is another example of failing to invest in our Communities. I awoke to a fb tag of a young man being shot at in East Pittsburgh. Only to read it was a youth volunteer of mine.”

She told the Post-Gazette she is friends with Rose’s mother and had known him since birth. “He was a beautiful little boy.” She said he was smart and played basketball and was “full of life.” She said he recently got his license and picked Nesby up for a ride. “It was a pleasure she said.” Nesby said she expected to see him last week to help plan a showing of “Black Panther” for local kids, but he couldn’t make it because his mother’s car was in the shop.

Fetterman told the Post-Gazette the entire community is “shocked” by Rose’s death. “He was just a really lovely, gentle kid. His mom is amazing. All the kids loved him. Just a fine person. Bubbly. Funny. Goofy. Just really special.”

About the shooting, Nesby told the newspaper, “I don’t know what he was doing in that car. I have no idea. To me, this death, they take it and go with it like it’s nothing.”

Fetterman added, “I just think he didn’t deserve what happened to him. It was hard for me to watch it.”


5. The Shooting Is Being Investigated by County Police & They Asked Anyone With Video or Information to Speak to Them

The Allegheny County Police Homicide Unit is investigating both incidents, according to WPXI-TV.

“In accordance with police best practices in the aftermath of officer-involved shootings, the Allegheny County Police Department Homicide detectives were requested to assume the role of independent investigating agency,” the department said in a statement. “The East Pittsburgh officer has been placed on administrative leave. ACPD Homicide will work closely with the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office as this investigation progresses, providing his staff with investigative findings for review.”

Police have not released details about the officer, including how long he has been with the department. The officer has not been interviewed yet by detectives. The police commissioner was asked at a press conference if the officer is white, and he responded by saying he is not sure what that has to do with the situation.

“That officer has the same right as any other citizen. He has a right to counsel, so I’m sure that plays into this scenario,” McDonough said.

Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen Zappala Jr.’s office said in a statement to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, “The county looped us in immediately. It is their investigation right now and they are keeping us updated in real time.”

Police added, “Anyone having information on these incidents, or video of any portion of the incidents, is asked to contact the Allegheny County Police Department. Callers to the ACPD Tip Line can remain anonymous – the number is 833.ALL.TIPS (833.255.8477). The department can also be reached via its social media sites.” In a Facebook post, the department said, “Please note that information is still being gathered regarding these incidents and is subject to change. Additional information will be provided as we are able.”

Reggie Shuford, of the ACLU of Pennsylvania, told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette he expects a “thorough, extensive and transparent investigation,” and added, “Based on the information that is currently available, the East Pittsburgh police officers involved in this tragic situation seem to have disregarded the basic humanity of this boy when they chose to use lethal force. While we await more details of what happened, it appears through the cell phone video that the victim was running away from the police. Our heart breaks for the family of the victim, and we express our deepest condolences to them.”

A large crime scene with several police officers remained near where the police-involved shooting happened late Tuesday night, according to KDKA-TV. Police said they were still searching the area for the person who fled from the vehicle and a state police helicopter was providing support.

The office of Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto tweeted a statement clarifying the shooting did not happen in his city, “This incident did not occur in the City of Pittsburgh or involve its police force. East Pittsburgh is a suburb outside of our jurisdiction named for its location east of our city.”

Peduto, a Democrat, released a new statement Wednesday morning, “Any loss of life is tragic and especially the loss of life of a child. This is a devastating situation and I am saddened for Antwon Rose and his family. While Tuesday’s shooting was not within the city’s official borders, it impacts all of us in the Pittsburgh region and particularly those in the African American community. In my reactions to the incident I should have acknowledged that these shootings affect all of us, no matter where we live, and for that I am sorry.”

He added, “Tuesday night I was receiving numerous calls and messages asking me to respond to the involvement of police in a shooting in East Pittsburgh borough and at the time I was attempting to clarify for the national public that the City of Pittsburgh Bureau of Police, which I ultimately oversee, were not involved. This was never intended to be, nor should it be, the focus of news coverage. I answer people when they reach out to me seeking factual information, just as all elected officials should be expected to do.”

101 Comments

101 Comments

John Evans

Shockingly left out of this article is the fact that two (2) handguns were found on rhe rear floor of the car. The .40 caliber one used in the drive-by shooting, and a 9mm handgun matching the 9mm magazine (which holds the bullets) found on Antwon after he was shot. Clearly not who is is being portrayed as. This guy was armed until a minute before he was shot. Also, its legal to shoot a fleeing suspect under certain circumstances.

Patti L Wise

While i do feel bad for, and pray for the family of this young man, why was he in volved in a car with guns, and why did he take of running ?

I prefer facts

Your questions seem to be a common theme among many comments here and elsewhere. I’m curious if there could be answers that would alter your view as to whether his running and the shooting was justified or not? I mean, if he had a good reason to be in the car with guns and take off running would it make a difference to your view about the shooting? How about if he didn’t have a good reason? I’m asking because I don’t see how whatever got him there and to take those actions could correlate to a justification for a peace officer to shoot an unarmed (no visible weapon, and definitely not holding or pointing one) suspect (not convicted in a court of law) in the back. The law regarding felony stops may allow it. I’m not sure. If so, I would like to see that law changed. I mean, this is a little bit hyperbole, but I wonder if the officer instead shot a j-walker in the back if there would be a lot of comments like “I feel bad for his family, but what made him decide to cross there? why step off the curb like that?” I mean would any answer justify that?

In California there is a bill AB 931 to limit police use of deadly force to immediate threats, etc.

Anonymous

You ask some good questions and most states have similar laws in regards to officers actions. First, understand that in an official capacity, officers are charged with protecting the public,not just themselves, so justification for their actions can extend beyond their personal well being. The first key question in relation to the officer shooting, is whether or not he had probable cause to believe that the occupants of the vehicle were involved in a forcible felony. I think we can all agree that he did on that point unless there are a lot of Chevy Cruz’s driving around that area with their back windows shot out. That makes everyone in the vehicle a suspect in a forcible felony. The second point will be the critical one. Did the officer have probable cause to believe that the occupants were still armed and dangerous, not just to him, but the public at large? He first arrested the driver and was able to restrain him and determine that he had no weapons. The other 2 occupants decide to disobey orders and flee. At this point, do you think from the perspective of the officer that its more or less likely that the 2 guys running from a car just involved in a forcible felony are still armed and dangerous? I’d say yes because there is little doubt one or the other or both were armed 15 minutes earlier and he had no idea at this point whether there was one or multiple shooters, so I think he gets to assume that anyone trying to escape was involved in the shooting.

I get that the officer didn’t know whether the two fleeing suspects were still armed or not, but I think he gets to assume they are. People who say he shot an unarmed person in the back, seem to just ignore the point that he reasonably believed at this point that they were still armed. The law doesn’t require that he must see a weapon before shooting (there are many cases where cops have shot where they thought a suspect had a gun but didn’t and were not charged). The law does require that he have reasonable belief (basically better than 50/50) that the suspect was involved in a forcible felony (which a drive by shooting is) and a reasonable belief that either his life or the lives of others are in imminent danger. I think the latter hinges on whether those suspects still possess a deadly weapon and as stated above, I think the cop gets to assume thats the case.

I think a murder charge is stupid. The cop arrested the man who complied without incident. He’s almost certain that at least one individual in the vehicle, possibly more, had just shot someone, so I don’t think there is any doubt his reaction was based on those facts and not out of anger. I think you can probably argue manslaughter if you believe that the criteria for shooting a fleeing forcible felony suspect was not met.

I prefer facts

Thanks for the detailed narrative on how currently the officer may have justified or even truly believed (I would call it crazy) that he acted rightly as well as how the current law may support his reasoning and actions. If you only read my message responding to Patti you may have missed the gist of what I’m proposing though. Basically I’m saying that regardless of the current law police should not shoot fleeing people in the back. I would say that the way you described the police officers reasoning is straight out ethically wrong. Unfortunately, your response seems to conflate that the police are “charged with protecting the public” with them being able to use extended reasoning supposing future crime or only probable cause or a reasonable belief when using deadly force. Those concepts (protecting the public and extended reasoning) need not be tied together. Personally, I definitely don’t want the police to shoot people dead because they were (or likely were) dangerous before and may get away and therefore MAY be dangerous again (i.e. extended reasoning). I want suspects brought to trial alive and hopefully well.. That, to me, protects the public (which in fact includes suspects). I’ve come to understand that not all states have the felony stop deadly force “free pass” that may have been the cause of this young suspects death while simply fleeing (and yes, actually without a weapon). I understand that Alabama does not do things this way and as far as I know it hasn’t caused the public massive harm and probably saved a lot of lives (of fleeing and sometimes, even, dare I say it? innocent suspects…oops).

Another example that came to mind while reading your response was the Dorner manhunt in California 2013. Two women working delivering newspapers were sitting in a pickup truck. Police officers just opened fire on them from a distance because the truck MAY have been similar to one Dorner was suspected of driving. The truck was riddled with bullet holes. Maybe 30+ from what I saw in the photos. One woman was seriously injured and probably suffered a a lot of psychological trauma. Guess what, I don’t want that. I also don’t think it’s reasonable for police to have a law that protects them from criminal charges when they pull that sort of crap. They are HIGHLY PAID relative to the risk they take (less than many other quotidian jobs, see my other posts in this same articles comment section) and they SHOULD be taking risks to capture suspects alive and bring them to a jury trial.

If you live in Pennsylvania and don’t want police to keep blasting away at unarmed suspects while fleeing I suggest you call your congressperson and ask them to sponsor or support a change to the law. You may even mention AB 931 in California which does just that.

Thanks again for the response.

Discuss on Facebook