Cade Cunningham: Everything you need to know

Cade Cunningham

#2 PG

Detroit Pistons

Status

ACTIVE

STATS

Career Averages

PTS

REB

AST

BLK

STL

22.5

5.4

8.0

0.7

1.1

Year	GP	GS	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	BLK	STL	TO	DD2	TD3	3PM	3PA	3P%	2PM	2PA	2P%	FGM	FGA	FG%	FTM	FTA	FT%	OREB	DREB	PF	A/TO	+/-	TS%
2025-26	64	64	33.9	23.9	5.5	9.9	0.8	1.4	3.7	38	3	2.0	5.7	34.2%	6.6	12.9	51.4%	8.6	18.6	46.1%	4.8	6.0	81.2%	0.9	4.7	3.1	2.7	+518	56.4%
2024-25	70	70	35.0	26.1	6.1	9.1	0.8	1.0	4.4	31	9	2.1	6.0	35.6%	7.6	14.8	51.5%	9.8	20.8	46.9%	4.5	5.3	84.6%	0.8	5.3	2.8	2.1	+175	56.5%
2023-24	62	62	33.5	22.7	4.3	7.5	0.4	0.9	3.4	14	0	1.9	5.4	35.5%	6.5	13.4	48.7%	8.5	18.8	44.9%	3.8	4.4	86.9%	0.5	3.8	2.5	2.2	-350	54.6%
2022-23	12	12	33.3	19.9	6.2	6.0	0.6	0.8	3.3	3	0	1.4	5.1	27.9%	6.3	13.6	46.6%	7.8	18.7	41.5%	3.0	3.6	83.7%	1.0	5.2	2.8	1.8	-60	49.2%
2021-22	64	64	32.6	17.4	5.5	5.6	0.7	1.2	3.7	10	2	1.8	5.7	31.4%	4.9	10.4	47.2%	6.7	16.1	41.6%	2.2	2.6	84.5%	0.9	4.6	3.1	1.5	-275	50.4%
Career	272	272	33.8	22.5	5.4	8.0	0.7	1.1	3.8	96	14	1.9	5.7	34.0%	6.4	13.0	49.8%	8.4	18.6	44.9%	3.8	4.5	84.0%	0.8	4.6	2.9	2.1	+8	54.5%

Career Averages

PTS

REB

AST

BLK

STL

28.3

6.6

8.1

1.0

1.3

Year	GP	GS	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	BLK	STL	TO	DD2	TD3	3PM	3PA	3P%	2PM	2PA	2P%	FGM	FGA	FG%	FTM	FTA	FT%	OREB	DREB	PF	A/TO	+/-	TS%
2025-26	10	10	40.5	30.2	5.6	7.7	0.8	1.0	5.8	5	1	2.8	7.0	40.0%	6.7	14.6	45.9%	9.5	21.6	44.0%	8.4	9.9	84.8%	1.2	4.4	3.0	1.3	+80	58.2%
2024-25	6	6	41.3	25.0	8.3	8.7	1.3	1.8	5.3	4	1	0.8	4.7	17.9%	8.3	16.8	49.5%	9.2	21.5	42.6%	5.8	7.0	83.3%	1.0	7.3	3.3	1.6	+9	50.9%
Career	16	16	40.8	28.3	6.6	8.1	1.0	1.3	5.6	9	2	2.1	6.1	33.7%	7.3	15.4	47.4%	9.4	21.6	43.5%	7.4	8.8	84.4%	1.1	5.5	3.1	1.4	+89	55.5%

Preseason
Date	Opp	Result	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	BLK	STL	TO	3PA	3PM	3P%	2PA	2PM	2P%	FGA	FGM	FG%	FTA	FTM	FT%	OREB	DREB	A/TO	+/-	PF	PER	TS%
10/16	WAS	W 119-98	23	16	1	12	1	2	2	4	3	75.0%	6	3	50.0%	10	6	60.0%	1	1	100.0%	0	1	6.0	+8	3	25	76.6%
10/9	MIL	L 117-111	18	26	6	6	0	2	1	5	2	40.0%	9	6	66.7%	14	8	57.1%	8	8	100.0%	1	5	6.0	+13	2	35	74.2%
10/6	MEM	W 128-112	18	20	3	4	0	2	3	3	2	66.7%	8	6	75.0%	11	8	72.7%	3	2	66.7%	0	3	1.3	+10	4	21	81.2%
Preseason Totals			20.5	20.7	3.3	7.3	0.3	2.0	2.0	4.0	2.3	58.3%	7.7	5.0	65.2%	11.7	7.3	62.9%	4.0	3.7	91.7%	0.3	3.0	3.7	+31	3.0	30.7	77.0%

Regular Season
Date	Opp	Result	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	BLK	STL	TO	3PA	3PM	3P%	2PA	2PM	2P%	FGA	FGM	FG%	FTA	FTM	FT%	OREB	DREB	A/TO	+/-	PF	PER	TS%
4/10	CHA	W 118-100	28	14	2	7	1	1	3	3	0	0.0%	10	7	70.0%	13	7	53.8%	1	0	0.0%	2	0	2.3	+3	1	15	52.1%
4/8	MIL	W 137-111	25	13	5	10	1	1	3	2	1	50.0%	9	5	55.6%	11	6	54.5%	0	0	0.0%	0	5	3.3	+12	3	20	59.1%
3/17	WAS	W 130-117	5	6	2	0	0	1	1	1	0	0.0%	2	2	100.0%	3	2	66.7%	2	2	100.0%	0	2	0.0	+0	1	9	77.3%
3/15	TOR	L 119-108	37	33	3	9	0	2	4	8	2	25.0%	16	10	62.5%	24	12	50.0%	8	7	87.5%	1	2	2.3	-13	4	33	60.0%
3/13	MEM	W 126-110	30	17	8	15	0	3	3	4	2	50.0%	7	4	57.1%	11	6	54.5%	3	3	100.0%	1	7	5.0	+23	3	34	69.0%
3/12	PHI	W 131-109	28	8	5	13	1	2	4	2	0	0.0%	4	3	75.0%	6	3	50.0%	2	2	100.0%	0	5	3.3	+27	1	22	58.1%
3/10	BKN	W 138-100	25	21	3	15	0	1	2	5	4	80.0%	5	4	80.0%	10	8	80.0%	3	1	33.3%	1	2	7.5	+37	3	32	92.8%
3/8	MIA	L 121-110	35	26	1	10	0	0	4	9	6	66.7%	9	3	33.3%	18	9	50.0%	2	2	100.0%	0	1	2.5	-16	3	25	68.9%
3/5	SAS	L 121-106	39	26	4	8	0	0	4	7	4	57.1%	19	6	31.6%	26	10	38.5%	2	2	100.0%	0	4	2.0	-7	5	12	48.4%
3/3	CLE	L 113-109	38	10	6	14	1	1	5	3	0	0.0%	13	4	30.8%	16	4	25.0%	2	2	100.0%	0	6	2.8	-11	5	11	29.6%
3/1	ORL	W 106-92	37	29	6	11	0	2	5	9	2	22.2%	16	9	56.3%	25	11	44.0%	6	5	83.3%	0	6	2.2	+14	0	30	52.5%
2/27	CLE	W 122-119	36	25	10	7	0	2	4	3	0	0.0%	18	11	61.1%	21	11	52.4%	5	3	60.0%	2	8	1.8	+2	6	24	53.9%
2/25	OKC	W 124-116	38	29	4	13	3	3	8	5	3	60.0%	11	8	72.7%	16	11	68.8%	4	4	100.0%	0	4	1.6	+17	5	38	81.6%
2/23	SAS	L 114-103	34	16	6	10	3	2	3	9	2	22.2%	17	3	17.6%	26	5	19.2%	5	4	80.0%	1	5	3.3	-18	5	5	28.4%
2/21	CHI	W 126-110	30	18	9	13	3	1	1	6	3	50.0%	10	4	40.0%	16	7	43.8%	1	1	100.0%	0	9	13.0	+28	2	34	54.7%
2/19	NYK	W 126-111	38	42	8	13	2	1	5	11	5	45.5%	23	12	52.2%	34	17	50.0%	3	3	100.0%	2	6	2.6	+12	0	43	59.5%
2/11	TOR	W 113-95	30	28	7	9	1	3	3	11	6	54.5%	3	3	100.0%	14	9	64.3%	6	4	66.7%	0	7	3.0	+26	1	42	84.1%
2/9	CHA	W 110-104	36	33	9	7	0	1	3	6	2	33.3%	21	10	47.6%	27	12	44.4%	7	7	100.0%	1	8	2.3	+14	4	33	54.9%
2/6	NYK	W 118-80	21	11	5	7	0	0	2	3	1	33.3%	8	3	37.5%	11	4	36.4%	3	2	66.7%	1	4	3.5	+9	4	11	44.6%
2/5	WAS	L 126-117	37	30	8	8	1	0	4	3	0	0.0%	18	10	55.6%	21	10	47.6%	13	10	76.9%	2	6	2.0	-16	2	34	56.1%
2/3	DEN	W 124-121	38	29	2	10	0	1	5	6	2	33.3%	13	7	53.8%	19	9	47.4%	11	9	81.8%	0	2	2.0	+11	5	25	60.8%
2/1	BKN	W 130-77	26	18	4	12	3	4	2	4	1	25.0%	7	6	85.7%	11	7	63.6%	7	3	42.9%	1	3	6.0	+34	3	35	63.9%
1/30	GSW	W 131-124	34	29	4	11	1	0	3	4	2	50.0%	15	9	60.0%	19	11	57.9%	6	5	83.3%	0	4	3.7	+1	2	35	67.0%
1/29	PHX	L 114-96	33	26	3	7	0	3	2	9	2	22.2%	13	6	46.2%	22	8	36.4%	10	8	80.0%	1	2	3.5	-5	1	26	49.2%
1/27	DEN	W 109-107	36	22	3	11	1	0	0	4	1	25.0%	13	8	61.5%	17	9	52.9%	4	3	75.0%	0	3	0.0	+1	1	30	58.6%
1/25	SAC	W 139-116	30	29	5	11	1	3	5	5	3	60.0%	17	10	58.8%	22	13	59.1%	1	0	0.0%	3	2	2.2	+18	4	33	64.6%
1/23	HOU	L 111-104	37	12	1	8	1	2	6	4	0	0.0%	9	5	55.6%	13	5	38.5%	3	2	66.7%	0	1	1.3	-10	5	6	41.9%
1/19	BOS	W 104-103	40	16	3	14	2	1	0	4	0	0.0%	13	4	30.8%	17	4	23.5%	10	8	80.0%	1	2	0.0	+1	3	21	37.4%
1/17	IND	W 121-78	21	16	3	5	0	0	2	3	2	66.7%	11	4	36.4%	14	6	42.9%	2	2	100.0%	0	3	2.5	+31	3	11	53.8%
1/15	PHX	W 108-105	38	10	4	11	1	0	5	7	0	0.0%	9	3	33.3%	16	3	18.8%	9	4	44.4%	0	4	2.2	+9	0	7	25.1%
1/5	NYK	W 121-90	29	29	3	13	2	1	5	4	3	75.0%	13	8	61.5%	17	11	64.7%	5	4	80.0%	0	3	2.6	+23	2	39	75.5%
1/4	CLE	W 114-110	37	27	6	7	1	2	1	5	2	40.0%	17	5	29.4%	22	7	31.8%	11	11	100.0%	0	6	7.0	-4	4	27	50.3%
1/1	MIA	L 118-112	39	31	8	11	2	3	7	6	2	33.3%	10	4	40.0%	16	6	37.5%	18	17	94.4%	1	7	1.6	+6	4	41	64.8%
12/30	LAL	W 128-106	32	27	5	11	0	1	5	4	1	25.0%	15	11	73.3%	19	12	63.2%	2	2	100.0%	0	5	2.2	+23	3	28	67.9%
12/28	LAC	L 112-99	32	27	5	9	0	0	3	7	3	42.9%	11	6	54.5%	18	9	50.0%	7	6	85.7%	0	5	3.0	-6	4	28	64.0%
12/26	UTA	L 131-129	37	29	5	17	2	2	4	6	3	50.0%	13	7	53.8%	19	10	52.6%	9	6	66.7%	0	5	4.3	-1	3	40	63.2%
12/23	SAC	W 136-127	38	23	7	14	0	5	9	5	2	40.0%	10	6	60.0%	15	8	53.3%	6	5	83.3%	0	7	1.6	+7	4	33	65.2%
12/22	POR	W 110-102	25	14	6	9	0	1	5	2	1	50.0%	7	5	71.4%	9	6	66.7%	2	1	50.0%	1	5	1.8	+11	6	17	70.9%
12/20	CHA	W 112-86	35	22	10	10	0	2	2	5	1	20.0%	15	8	53.3%	20	9	45.0%	4	3	75.0%	2	8	5.0	+33	3	28	50.6%
12/18	DAL	L 116-114	44	29	10	9	1	0	4	9	2	22.2%	21	10	47.6%	30	12	40.0%	4	3	75.0%	0	10	2.3	+2	3	27	45.7%
12/15	BOS	W 112-105	36	32	4	10	0	1	3	10	6	60.0%	11	5	45.5%	21	11	52.4%	4	4	100.0%	0	4	3.3	+2	5	33	70.3%
12/12	ATL	W 142-115	22	15	1	6	2	2	1	3	2	66.7%	7	3	42.9%	10	5	50.0%	6	3	50.0%	0	1	6.0	+8	1	19	59.3%
12/6	MIL	W 124-112	31	23	6	12	1	0	3	10	3	30.0%	8	5	62.5%	18	8	44.4%	4	4	100.0%	2	4	4.0	+28	2	30	58.2%
12/5	POR	W 122-116	36	29	4	9	1	3	1	4	2	50.0%	11	5	45.5%	15	7	46.7%	14	13	92.9%	3	1	9.0	-4	3	38	68.5%
12/3	MIL	L 113-109	35	17	7	7	0	1	2	7	1	14.3%	8	4	50.0%	15	5	33.3%	6	6	100.0%	1	6	3.5	+7	1	23	48.2%
12/1	ATL	W 99-98	38	18	8	8	3	6	6	4	0	0.0%	11	7	63.6%	15	7	46.7%	4	4	100.0%	0	8	1.3	+6	1	30	53.7%
11/29	MIA	W 138-135	38	29	4	8	1	2	8	5	1	20.0%	20	13	65.0%	25	14	56.0%	1	0	0.0%	1	3	1.0	+2	5	21	57.0%
11/28	ORL	L 112-109	39	39	13	11	0	0	8	7	4	57.1%	19	9	47.4%	26	13	50.0%	12	9	75.0%	4	9	1.4	+16	2	43	62.3%
11/26	BOS	L 117-114	36	42	8	5	1	1	4	9	4	44.4%	17	8	47.1%	26	12	46.2%	16	14	87.5%	3	5	1.3	+0	3	42	63.6%
11/24	IND	W 122-117	35	24	11	6	0	0	3	2	0	0.0%	16	8	50.0%	18	8	44.4%	10	8	80.0%	4	7	2.0	-1	4	29	53.6%
11/22	MIL	W 129-116	32	29	8	10	1	1	4	6	3	50.0%	12	7	58.3%	18	10	55.6%	6	6	100.0%	1	7	2.5	+14	3	35	70.3%
11/18	ATL	W 120-112	33	25	6	10	0	2	3	7	1	14.3%	16	9	56.3%	23	10	43.5%	4	4	100.0%	0	6	3.3	+3	4	25	50.5%
11/10	WAS	W 137-135	44	46	12	11	2	5	2	11	2	18.2%	34	12	35.3%	45	14	31.1%	18	16	88.9%	5	7	5.5	+10	4	44	43.5%
11/9	PHI	W 111-108	40	26	4	11	0	1	5	4	1	25.0%	16	8	50.0%	20	9	45.0%	9	7	77.8%	0	4	2.2	+13	4	26	54.3%
11/7	BKN	W 125-107	32	34	1	10	0	1	4	6	2	33.3%	12	11	91.7%	18	13	72.2%	6	6	100.0%	0	1	2.5	+13	3	39	82.4%
11/5	UTA	W 114-103	36	31	3	10	0	1	3	9	3	33.3%	19	10	52.6%	28	13	46.4%	2	2	100.0%	1	2	3.3	+8	4	27	53.7%
11/3	MEM	W 114-106	38	33	5	8	1	0	3	6	3	50.0%	14	9	64.3%	20	12	60.0%	10	6	60.0%	0	5	2.7	+12	5	32	67.6%
11/1	DAL	W 122-110	37	21	6	18	0	3	1	4	2	50.0%	12	5	41.7%	16	7	43.8%	8	5	62.5%	0	6	18.0	+11	3	37	53.8%
10/29	ORL	W 135-116	35	30	6	10	3	3	0	7	1	14.3%	17	11	64.7%	24	12	50.0%	5	5	100.0%	1	5	0.0	+27	2	42	57.3%
10/27	CLE	L 116-95	28	12	5	4	1	0	5	7	1	14.3%	7	2	28.6%	14	3	21.4%	6	5	83.3%	2	3	0.8	-16	3	6	36.1%
10/26	BOS	W 119-113	37	25	3	8	1	0	6	5	2	40.0%	13	6	46.2%	18	8	44.4%	7	7	100.0%	0	3	1.3	+0	4	20	59.3%
10/24	HOU	W 115-111	39	21	7	9	1	0	8	8	3	37.5%	8	4	50.0%	16	7	43.8%	5	4	80.0%	1	6	1.1	+7	3	21	57.7%
10/22	CHI	L 115-111	34	23	7	10	0	1	3	6	1	16.7%	18	7	38.9%	24	8	33.3%	10	6	60.0%	2	5	3.3	-6	6	20	40.5%
Regular Season Totals			34.1	24.2	5.5	9.8	0.9	1.5	3.7	5.7	2.0	34.4%	13.0	6.7	51.5%	18.7	8.7	46.3%	6.1	4.9	81.2%	0.9	4.6	2.7	+488	3.1	31.7	56.7%

Postseason
Date	Opp	Result	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	BLK	STL	TO	3PA	3PM	3P%	2PA	2PM	2P%	FGA	FGM	FG%	FTA	FTM	FT%	OREB	DREB	A/TO	+/-	PF	PER	TS%
5/9	CLE	L 116-109	38	27	10	10	0	1	8	6	2	33.3%	21	8	38.1%	27	10	37.0%	6	5	83.3%	6	4	1.3	+6	5	17	45.5%
5/7	CLE	W 107-97	41	25	3	10	2	1	5	6	3	50.0%	8	4	50.0%	14	7	50.0%	8	8	100.0%	0	3	2.0	+13	3	31	71.3%
5/5	CLE	W 111-101	41	23	3	7	0	2	4	5	2	40.0%	14	4	28.6%	19	6	31.6%	11	9	81.8%	0	3	1.8	+12	2	19	48.2%
5/3	ORL	W 116-94	39	32	1	12	2	0	4	6	4	66.7%	12	6	50.0%	18	10	55.6%	10	8	80.0%	0	1	3.0	+29	4	37	71.4%
5/1	ORL	W 93-79	42	32	10	3	1	4	4	4	2	50.0%	19	8	42.1%	23	10	43.5%	12	10	83.3%	1	9	0.8	+7	3	34	56.6%
4/29	ORL	W 116-109	43	45	4	5	0	1	6	8	5	62.5%	15	8	53.3%	23	13	56.5%	14	14	100.0%	3	1	0.8	+3	3	42	77.2%
4/27	ORL	L 94-88	38	25	9	6	2	0	8	11	3	27.3%	12	4	33.3%	23	7	30.4%	10	8	80.0%	0	9	0.8	-7	5	16	45.6%
4/25	ORL	L 113-105	41	27	5	9	0	0	9	10	3	30.0%	13	5	38.5%	23	8	34.8%	9	8	88.9%	2	3	1.0	+2	3	18	50.1%
4/22	ORL	W 98-83	37	27	6	11	1	1	7	6	1	16.7%	13	10	76.9%	19	11	57.9%	8	4	50.0%	0	6	1.6	+16	2	31	59.9%
4/19	ORL	L 112-101	40	39	5	4	0	0	3	8	3	37.5%	19	10	52.6%	27	13	48.1%	11	10	90.9%	0	5	1.3	-1	0	35	61.2%
Postseason Totals			40.5	30.2	5.6	7.7	0.8	1.0	5.8	7.0	2.8	40.0%	14.6	6.7	45.9%	21.6	9.5	44.0%	9.9	8.4	84.8%	1.2	4.4	1.3	+80	3.0	32.3	58.2%

Cade Cunningham: Breaking News

Cunningham finished with 27 points (10-27 FG, 2-6 3Pt, 5-6 FT), 10 rebounds, 10 assists and one steal in Saturday's 116-109 loss to Cleveland in Game 3 of the Eastern Conference Semifinals. Cunningham finished with his first triple-double of the postseason. However, not everything went well, with the 24-year-old committing eight turnovers, nearly as many as he had in the first two contests of the series combined. He also had trouble shooting the ball, averaging 37.0 percent from the field and 33.3 percent from behind the three-point line. With the victory by the Cavaliers, Cunningham and company will look to get back in the win column in Game 4 on Monday night.

Cunningham produced 25 points (7-14 FG, 3-6 3Pt, 8-8 FT), four rebounds, 10 assists, one steal and two blocks across 42 minutes during Thursday's 107-97 victory in Game 2 of the Eastern Conference Semifinals against Cleveland. Cunningham was quiet by his standards through the first three quarters of play, but he stepped up down the stretch. The star guard erupted for 12 points in the final six minutes, which included a pair of key treys to help Detroit get out to a 2-0 lead in the series. Cunningham has put up 20-plus points in each of the first two games of the Eastern Conference Semifinals, and he's also recorded a pair of steals in each appearance.

Cunningham totaled 23 points (6-19 FG, 2-5 3Pt, 9-11 FT), seven assists, three rebounds and two steals across 42 minutes in Tuesday's 111-101 win over Cleveland in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Semifinals. Cunningham struggled with efficiency from the field but made the most of his trips to the charity stripe, finishing with a team-high 23 points in Detroit's critical Game 1 victory. The star guard has now scored at least 20 points in all eight of the Pistons' playoff games in 2026 after turning in a strong first-round series against the Magic, during which he averaged 32.4 points, 7.1 assists and 5.7 rebounds while shooting 46.2 percent from the field and 39.6 percent from beyond the arc across seven contests. Cunningham continuing to produce, particularly with greater efficiency than Tuesday, will be key as Detroit looks to take a commanding 2-0 series lead Thursday.