Melissa Hodgman, Peter Strzok’s Wife: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Getty Peter Strzok's family includes wife Melissa Hodgman.

Peter Strzok, the top FBI agent under fire for allegedly sending anti-Donald Trump texts, is married to Melissa Hodgman, an official at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

An obituary confirms that Strzok is married to Hodgman, 49, who was named to her position with the SEC in October 2016. Peter Strzok, a top counter-terrorism agent in the FBI, was quietly removed from Robert Mueller’s probe into President Donald Trump and his associates when Mueller learned that Strzok had allegedly sent the texts. “Bosses discovered he and another member of Mueller’s team had exchanged politically charged texts disparaging President Trump and supporting Hillary Clinton,” The Washington Post reported.

On July 12, 2018, he was questioned by members of Congress and heatedly denied that his texted opinions about Trump influenced the investigations into the president and Hillary Clinton.

“I understand we are living in a political era in which insults and insinuation often drown out honesty and integrity,” Strzok told members of the House Oversight and Judiciary committees during the heated hearing. “I have the utmost respect for Congress’s oversight role, but I truly believe that today’s hearing is just another victory notch in Putin’s belt.”

The hearing was so contentious that at one point Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas told Strzok: “I can’t help but wonder when I see you looking there with a little smirk, how many times did you look so innocent into your wife’s eye and lie to her about Lisa,” referring to Lisa Page, the woman with whom Strzok had an affair.

According to CNN, Strzok, 47, was the person who switched language in former FBI Director James Comey’s draft statement on Hillary Clinton and her emails, weakening the language in a way that worked in Clinton’s favor. You can see a photo of Hodgman here.

Here’s what you need to know:

1. Hodgman Has Worked for the SEC Since 2008 & Pledged ‘Tough But Fair’ Enforcement

Hodgman started working in the enforcement division at the SEC in 2008 as a staff attorney and was promoted to assistant director in 2012. She investigated numerous cases of fraud and earned a $229,968 salary in 2016, reported.

“I am honored by this appointment and look forward to continuing our tradition of pursuing tough but fair enforcement actions in complex and cutting-edge cases, especially matters involving cross-border issues and efforts to hold gatekeepers accountable for breaches of their professional standards,” Hodgman said in a news release.

According to an SEC press release, “Before joining the SEC staff, Ms. Hodgman worked as an associate at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy in Washington. Ms. Hodgman earned her masters of law with distinction in securities and financial regulation in 2007 from Georgetown University Law Center, her law degree with high honors from Georgetown University Law Center in 1994, and her bachelor of science degree from Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in 1990. Ms. Hodgman received the Ellen B. Ross Award as well as an SEC Chairman’s Award in 2010.”

2. Hodgman & Strzok Both Graduated From Georgetown University

Georgetown UniversityA Georgetown University donation page showing Strzok and his wife donated.

Both Hodgman and Strzok graduated from Georgetown University, a list of donors to the university showed. Strzok earned his master’s degree from the school in 2013, the list indicated. In 2012, the couple donated between $2,500-4,999 to their alma mater.

Hodgman and Strzok also donated between $250-499 to the Shakespeare Theatre Company, a 2007-08 annual report said. The couple live in the Fairfax, Virginia area and purchased a home for $520,000 in June 2003, according to public real estate records.

An obituary for Hodgman’s mother showed the mother lived in New York and is from Pennsylvania and reads, “A beautiful woman, loving mother, grandmother, writer and humanist passed away November 15, 2010 at age 67.” It says that Melissa Hodgman is one of three children.

Peter Strzok has had a hand in many of the FBI’s most recent controversies. Fox News reported that “Strzok, a former deputy to the assistant director for counterintelligence at the FBI, oversaw the bureau’s interviews with ousted National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, changed former FBI Director James Comey’s early draft language about Hillary Clinton’s actions regarding her private email server from ‘grossly negligent’ to ‘extremely careless’ and reportedly helped push the largely unverified dossier on Trump that was initially prepared by Fusion GPS for the Clinton campaign’s opposition research.”

3. Peter Strzok Is Accused of Having an Affair With an FBI Lawyer, Reports Say

According to The Washington Post, during the Clinton investigation, “Strzok was involved in a romantic relationship with FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who worked for Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.” McCabe himself has been criticized because his wife received money from groups with alliances to Clinton. According to Newsweek, “It’s true that for her campaign, Jill McCabe received a total of $675,288 from two entities associated with McAuliffe: a political action committee and the Virginia Democratic Party.” She was running for Virginia’s senate at the time. “McAuliffe is a longtime friend of Hillary and Bill Clinton,” reported Newsweek.

Strzok exchanged messages with Page that helped lead to his ouster from the Mueller team, the Post reported. “Of greater concern among senior law enforcement officials were text messages the two exchanged during the Clinton investigation and campaign season in which they expressed anti-Trump sentiments and other comments that appeared to favor Clinton,” according to the newspaper.

According to The Daily Caller, “Strzok’s text messages with Page, his mistress, were first discovered by the Justice Department’s inspector general as part of an investigation that has been conducting into the FBI and DOJ’s handling of the Clinton email investigation.”

The site adds, “Strzok, a former Army officer, was the lead FBI investigator on that inquiry, too. He conducted the July 2, 2016, interview with Clinton herself. He was attended by David Laufman, a Justice Department lawyer and Obama donor.”

4. Melissa Hodgman Has Handled Cases Into Alleged Financial Fraud But One Big Case Crumbled

The press release on Hodgman’s SEC promotion lists some of the cases she’s been involved in, and all involve variations of financial fraud. However, one prominent prosecution crumbled. The press release lists these cases as noteworthy:

“The SEC’s first case against a brokerage firm for failing to file SARs when appropriate.

Fraud charges against a Wall Street CEO and his company, family members, and business associates accused of secretly obtaining control and manipulating the stock of Chinese companies they were purportedly guiding through the process of raising capital and becoming publicly-traded in the United States

Fraud and other related charges against China North East Petroleum Holdings, its CEO, President and former Chairman of the Board of Directors, and others arising from their alleged diversion of offering proceeds to the personal accounts of corporate insiders and their immediate family members and fraudulent conduct in connection with at least 176 undisclosed related-party transactions.

Charges against Charles Schwab Investment Management, Charles Schwab & Co., and two executives for making misleading statements regarding the Schwab YieldPlus Fund and failing to establish, maintain and enforce policies and procedures to prevent the misuse of material, nonpublic information.”

Hodgman “has led the Enforcement Division’s Cross-Border Working Group, which provides expertise and assistance of matters with international actors and implications,” the press release adds. “Ms. Hodgman also co-founded and served as the enforcement representative on the Chair’s Attorney Honors Program, and is a member of the Enforcement Division’s hiring committee at its Washington D.C. headquarters.”

“Melissa has supervised and investigated a broad range of noteworthy and first-of-their-kind cases across the spectrum of the securities industry and involving misconduct located around the world,” said Andrew J. Ceresney, Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division, said in the news release. “She has distinguished herself with her excellent judgment and creativity, and I am pleased to have her join the senior ranks of the Enforcement Division.”

One case in particular has caused controversy, however. In 2015, she supervised the investigation that led to “fraud charges against a Wall Street CEO and his company, family members, and business associates accused of secretly obtaining control and manipulating the stock of Chinese companies they were purportedly guiding through the process of raising capital and becoming publicly-traded in the United States,” an SEC press release says. In that case, the SEC alleged that “Benjamin Wey and New York Global Group (NYGG) typically structured reverse mergers between clients and publicly-traded shell companies in such a way that he and other family members secretly obtained ownership interests of more than five percent of the newly listed companies,” the release said.

Also charged: Wey’s “two attorneys Robert Newman and William Uchimoto.” The involvement of Uchimoto in the case has led to controversy online. According to the New York Law Journal, “A federal judge in Manhattan on Monday threw out civil securities fraud claims against William Uchimoto.” The case against Wey also fell completely apart.

“U.S. securities regulators…moved to drop their fraud case against Wall Street financier Benjamin Wey, about a month after prosecutors dropped a related criminal case after a judge threw out some evidence,” Reuters reported. According to Reuters, “The criminal case against Wey collapsed in June, when U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan ruled that a huge cache of materials seized from Wey’s home and offices could not be used because they were obtained with overly broad search warrants that violated Wey’s constitutional rights.”

The article continued, “Nathan said the seizure of items such as children’s school records, family photos and X-rays at minimum reflected ‘grossly negligent or reckless disregard’ of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure.”

5. Peter Strzok Changed the Comey Language from ‘Grossly Negligent’

Hillary Clinton, Hillary Clinton NRA, Hillary Clinton Las Vegas

GettyHillary Clinton.

Speaking of the words “grossly negligent,” that term has also featured in criticism lodged against Peter Strzok. According to CNN, Peter Strzok “changed a key phrase in former FBI Director James Comey’s description of how former secretary of state Hillary Clinton handled classified information.”

The network further alleged that “electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey’s earlier draft language describing Clinton’s actions as ‘grossly negligent’ to ‘extremely careless.'” That has legal significance because gross negligence is language needed for a criminal charge.

In addition, nine members of Robert Mueller’s team previously donated to Hillary Clinton or Democrats, records show.




If Hillary Clinton was using a server that was a personal/ private server, she has every Right to do with such a server, as she wills!… IT WASN’T GOVERNMENT ISSUED, AND IT WASN’T “GOVERNMENT MANAGED”! The “MATTER”!… IS THE SECURITY OF THE INFORMATION COMMUNICATED ON SUCH COMMERCIAL SERVERS!
And, frankly!… the FACT is!… if the “Commercial Server (and cellphone!)” that Hillary was using C-A-N-‘-T B-E T-R-U-S-T-E-D T-O E-N-S-U-R-E S-E-C-U-R-E I-N-F-O-R-M-A-T-I-O-N C-O-M-M-U-N-I-C-A-T-I-O-N-S… then!… W-H-A-T T-H-E H-*-L-L D-O-E-S T-H-I-S S-A-Y A-B-O-U-T T-H-E R-E-S-T O-F U-S? Why aren’t American “Security Advisers” A-L-L O-V-E-R the inefficient and ineffective Commercial OEMs, re their inability to produce V-I-A-B-L-E C-O-M-M-U-N-I-C-A-T-I-O-N-S P-R-O-D-U-C-T-S?… A-N-D, F-O-R E-V-E-R-Y-B-O-D-Y? And!… W-H-Y T-H-E H-*-L-L I-S S-U-C-H C-O-M-M-E-R-C-I-A-L I-N-E-F-F-I-C-I-E-N-Y A-N-D I-N-E-F-F-E-C-T-I-V-E-N-E-S-S H-E-R P-R-O-B-L-E-M?
This is not about… HAS N-E-V-E-R BEEN ABOUT!… Hillary Clinton having gone “Rogue”, and communicating “Federal secrets” to “foreign powers”!… e.g., to “S-P-E-C-T-R-E”! It’s about her use of a personal/ private commercial server (and cellphone!)!… and her deletion of said “personal sensitive information” on her personal/ private commercial server, afterupon learning of expressed concerns by “America Security Interests (namely, the FBI!)” of the “unsecured nature” of the communications, by way of the products she was using! (ATTENTION: Please recall the FBI’s offering… though belated!… that there was NOTHING TO BE HAD in a further use of the FBI’s time and resources re Hillary’s emails!… as there was NOTHING OF CONSEQUENCE– SO SAID!– WITH THE INVESTIGATED EMAIL CONTENTS!)
In other words!… if the Commerical Server she was using (and!… add in, her cellphone!) was to a REASONABLE STANDARD, then a “directive” to use Government mandated, and issued “SECURE TECHNOMAE” would not have been an issue!… would not have come up! And!… and as far as I’m concerned!… if U.S. Government information was inadvertently leaked, or hacked!… AND COMPROMISED THE SECURITY OF AMERICA!… I wouldn’t be blaming her (going after her!) for such a hack, I-‘-D B-E B-L-A-M-I-N-G (G-O-I-N-G A-F-T-E-R!) W-H-O-E-V-E-R A-L-L-O-W-E-D T-H-E S-A-L-E A-N-D D-I-S-T-R-I-B-U-T-I-O-N O-F S-U-C-H C-R-*-P T-E-C-H-N-O-M-A-E A-N-Y-W-H-E-R-E I-N T-H-E U.S. O-F A.! And!… if such cr*p is to be sold, it’s to be sold with a M-A-N-D-A-T-E-D W-A-R-N-I-N-G, T-H-A-T T-H-E U-S-E O-F S-A-M-E C-A-N-‘-T B-E T-R-U-S-T-E-D!
Again!… what does this V-I-R-T-U-A-L A-D-M-I-S-S-I-O-N of COMMERCIAL ICT INSECURITY by way of the FBI, say about O-U-R U-S-E of such “proprietary technoma”? If the FBI… AND, “S-A-V-V-Y POLITICAL PUNDITS AND VOTERS”!… don’t think that such commercial Internet servers (and cellphones!) are “S-E-R-V-I-N-G O-U-R I-N-T-E-R-E-S-T-S”, then should W-E be using such systems?
This, then, is not an indictment of Hillary Clinton!… T-H-I-S I-S A-N I-N-D-I-C-T-M-E-N-T O-F T-H-E P-R-O-P-R-I-E-T-A-R-Y C-R-*-P (THE SAMSUNG DEBACLE, NOTWITHSTANDING!) T-H-A-T M-I-L-L-I-O-N-S O-F N-E-T-I-Z-E-N-S A-R-O-U-N-D T-H-E W-O-R-L-D A-R-E U-S-I-N-G O-N A D-A-I-L-Y B-A-S-I-S T-O C-O-M-M-U-N-I-C-A-T-E W-I-T-H! And so!… please!… GIVE US A BREAK FROM THIS R-H-E-T-O-R-I-C, A-N-D N-O-N-E-S-E-N-S-E! H*ll!… James Comey admits to putting hockey tape over his webcam!… and advises us to do the same (see, h-t-t-p://www(dot)dailymail(dot)co(dot)uk/ sciencetech/article-3790585/FBI-director-covers-webcam-TAPE-says-doing-stop-hackers-spying.html )!… and so!… so much for Comey’s confidence in American technomae in keeping us safe!
And have a look at the Google result, titled, Volkswagen scandal Confirms the Dangers of Proprietary Code, by David Bollier!… i.e., if one needs a “refresher” on the perils of commercial software! And then… check out the Purism Librem 15 PC!… and other such Free and Open Source Software based (FOSS based!) and Free and Open Source Hardware based (FOSH based!) ICT devices (including, FOSS and FOSH based servers!)!… and compare these just cited technomae to the said “SECURE SYSTEMS” being touted/ proffered by our “Security Infrastructure (and by the FBI!)” as the “SECURITY SOLUTION” for America’s bureaucracies!
And last of all, let’s get something straight here, re the WikiLeaking of emails during this now past U.S. Federal Election!
Trump has been willing to receive the WikiLeaks “goods” on elements of Clinton’s Campaign (and etc.!)… but!… he won’t be going after, nor “speaking to/ about”, the WikiLeaks revelations by Assange, that led to Julian Assange seeking asylum for a series of “alleged” BREACHES OF NATIONAL SECURITY (for which, Julian Assange– Hillary declared!– must be brought to the U.S. to account for!)!… and, of course– and conveniently!– YOU, Donald Trump, don’t use email! And so!… the question to be asked, is:… Will YOU, Donald Trump, be seeking to bring Julian Assange to the U.S. to face charges concerning Assange’s “WikiLeaking” of sensitive undertakings by the U.S. Government?… or!… Will YOU, Trump, be letting Julian Assange “off the hook (i.e., now that the leaked emails have– in part!– been instrumental in your ‘win’!)”? Or!… could it be, that YOU, Trump, don’t view Julian Assange’s WikiLeaking of U.S. Government Strategic Information on Foreign Military Tactical Operations to be a breach of National Security! And so!… with that admission (spoken, or unspoken!)!… one can only assume that YOU, Trump, will be allowing Julian Assange “FREE REIN (AND, REIGN!)”, re any “future WikiLeaking” of said sensitive U.S. Government Strategic Military Tactical Information!… domestic, or foreign! But!… if YOU, Trump, DON’T AGREE with the WikiLeaking by Assange of sensitive U.S. Government Strategic Military Tactical Information, then what’s this acceptance of the WikiLeaking of Hillary Clinton’s Campaign information all about? Is it YOUR VIEW, Trump… now (and despite the FBI’s expressed concerns about Hillary’s said mishandling of emails!)!… that it’s OK to not only “play” with emails THAT SHOULDN’T BE MISHANDLED!… but, it’s also OK– at once!– to “thumb your nose” at the FBI’s expression of concern about Hillary’s said mishandling of her emails! Trump!… alleged C-H-I-L-D A-B-U-S-I-N-G P-O-T-U-S!… you can’t have it both ways!
If the release by Julian Assange of sensitive U.S. Government Strategic Military Tactical Information is of BENEFIT to the U.S. Government… YEA, TO THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY!… then, YOU, Trump, should come out and say so! Otherwise!… you are being a H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E in offering up A-N-Y C-R-I-T-I-C-I-S-M of Julian Assange’s WikiLeaking of sensitive U.S. Government information, while… all the while!… Russia– AND YOU!– have “played” with WikiLeaked email information, that the FBI (for one!) has suggested, SHOULDN’T HAVE BEEN MISHANDLED! And thus, you have “THUMBED YOUR NOSE” AT THE FBI’S EXPRESSED CONCERNS!… and this, apart from allegations of COLLUSION by YOU (and company!) and the Russian Government, re hacks into Democratic Campaign servers!
And so… it would appear L-U-D-I-C-R-O-U-S to believe that Trump was NOT INVOLVED in a CONSPIRACY to COLLUDE with Russia and Putin, to effect a “Presidential win”! BUT, M-O-R-E-O-V-E-R!… and given the numerous reports that/ which have amassed evidence of Trump’s involvement in C-H-I-L-D A-B-U-S-E!… it would appear L-U-D-I-C-R-O-U-S to believe that Trump ISN’T GUILTY of E-V-E-N W-O-R-S-E C-R-I-M-E-S than those which have been alleged, re Russian/ Putin COLLUSION (save!… and of course!… PROOFS that would establish such CHILD ABUSE EVIDENCE as FAKE NEWS!… and, worthy of “TORTIOUS POTUS REBUTTAL”!)! Therefore, I– for one!– C-O-U-L-D C-A-R-E L-E-S-S WHAT THIS “MAN” THINKS OF REPORTS, THAT, “RUSSIANS HAD HACKED PODESTA’S EMAIL ACCOUNT”!… AND!… I C-O-U-L-D C-A-R-E E-V-E-N L-E-S-S WHAT THIS “MAN” THINKS IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE ABOUT HILLARY’S “MISSING EMAILS”! And his “sarcastic comment” had N-O-T-H-I-N-G T-O D-O with the press I-N-T-E-R-P-R-E-T-I-N-G THE F-A-C-T-S! And the SENSATIONAL HEADLINES were the product of a D-E-L-U-S-I-O-N-A-L M-I-N-D!… who has created– and who creates daily!– THE SEEDS OF HIS OWN F-O-L-L-Y, A-N-D E-V-E-N-T-U-A-L D-O-W-N-F-A-L-L!

Agent Nunyabis

Did you miss something in your first YUGE!!!!!!!!!!!! comment asshole?


Fire this from the deep state….she is now exposed!

Discuss on Facebook