Cody Williams: Everything you need to know

Cody Williams

#5 SG

Utah Jazz

Status

ACTIVE

STATS

Career Averages

PTS

REB

AST

BLK

STL

7.0

2.7

1.7

0.4

0.6

Year	GP	GS	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	BLK	STL	TO	DD2	3PM	3PA	3P%	2PM	2PA	2P%	FGM	FGA	FG%	FTM	FTA	FT%	OREB	DREB	PF	A/TO	+/-	TS%
2025-26	67	41	24.3	8.8	3.0	2.0	0.4	0.8	1.1	2	0.4	2.0	21.4%	3.1	5.6	55.6%	3.6	7.6	46.8%	1.3	1.8	70.6%	0.9	2.0	1.8	1.9	-393	52.4%
2024-25	50	21	21.2	4.6	2.3	1.2	0.3	0.5	0.9	0	0.7	2.7	25.9%	1.0	2.4	39.3%	1.7	5.1	32.3%	0.6	0.8	72.5%	0.5	1.7	1.9	1.3	-339	41.9%
Career	117	62	23.0	7.0	2.7	1.7	0.4	0.6	1.0	2	0.5	2.3	23.7%	2.2	4.3	51.6%	2.7	6.5	41.9%	1.0	1.4	71.1%	0.8	1.9	1.9	1.7	-732	48.9%

Preseason
Date	Opp	Result	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	BLK	STL	TO	3PA	3PM	3P%	2PA	2PM	2P%	FGA	FGM	FG%	FTA	FTM	FT%	OREB	DREB	A/TO	+/-	PF	PER	TS%
10/13	DAL	L 114-101	26	13	3	1	2	1	0	4	1	25.0%	10	4	40.0%	14	5	35.7%	2	2	100.0%	1	2	0.0	-5	1	8	43.7%
10/10	SAS	L 134-130	25	12	4	2	0	1	0	3	1	33.3%	5	3	60.0%	8	4	50.0%	4	3	75.0%	1	3	0.0	+23	3	13	61.5%
10/8	HOU	L 140-127	13	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0%	5	1	20.0%	5	1	20.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0	-10	2	4	20.0%
Preseason Totals			21.7	9.0	2.3	1.0	0.7	0.7	0.0	2.3	0.7	28.6%	6.7	2.7	40.0%	9.0	3.3	37.0%	2.0	1.7	83.3%	0.7	1.7	3.0	+8	2.0	8.7	45.5%

Regular Season
Date	Opp	Result	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	BLK	STL	TO	3PA	3PM	3P%	2PA	2PM	2P%	FGA	FGM	FG%	FTA	FTM	FT%	OREB	DREB	A/TO	+/-	PF	PER	TS%
4/10	MEM	W 147-101	33	14	3	5	0	0	2	6	2	33.3%	10	4	40.0%	16	6	37.5%	2	0	0.0%	0	3	2.5	+37	0	9	41.5%
4/7	NOP	L 156-137	34	19	4	5	0	0	3	5	0	0.0%	12	8	66.7%	17	8	47.1%	4	3	75.0%	0	4	1.7	-20	2	15	50.6%
4/5	OKC	L 146-111	36	8	4	5	0	3	1	2	0	0.0%	9	3	33.3%	11	3	27.3%	2	2	100.0%	0	4	5.0	-27	1	9	33.7%
4/3	HOU	L 140-106	38	27	11	4	0	0	2	2	0	0.0%	14	10	71.4%	16	10	62.5%	10	7	70.0%	5	6	2.0	-29	2	35	66.2%
4/1	DEN	L 130-117	37	9	2	9	0	1	3	3	1	33.3%	7	2	28.6%	10	3	30.0%	2	2	100.0%	0	2	3.0	-14	3	9	41.4%
3/30	CLE	L 122-113	36	26	6	4	0	2	2	2	0	0.0%	20	11	55.0%	22	11	50.0%	6	4	66.7%	2	4	2.0	-2	3	23	52.8%
3/28	PHX	L 134-109	28	0	2	2	1	1	3	2	0	0.0%	7	0	0.0%	9	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	2	0.7	-31	2	9	0.0%
3/27	DEN	L 135-129	30	24	0	7	0	2	1	0	0	0.0%	14	9	64.3%	14	9	64.3%	7	6	85.7%	0	0	7.0	-1	3	29	70.3%
3/25	WAS	L 133-110	37	24	4	1	1	2	4	3	0	0.0%	17	11	64.7%	20	11	55.0%	4	2	50.0%	1	3	0.3	-18	1	17	55.1%
3/21	PHI	L 126-116	34	15	0	3	0	0	3	4	0	0.0%	11	5	45.5%	15	5	33.3%	6	5	83.3%	0	0	1.0	-18	4	2	42.5%
3/19	MIL	W 128-96	27	23	3	5	0	1	1	2	1	50.0%	14	9	64.3%	16	10	62.5%	4	2	50.0%	0	3	5.0	+4	0	26	64.8%
3/18	MIN	L 147-111	24	7	5	2	0	1	0	2	1	50.0%	4	2	50.0%	6	3	50.0%	0	0	0.0%	2	3	0.0	-9	1	11	58.3%
3/15	SAC	L 116-111	38	34	7	7	1	1	3	7	3	42.9%	13	9	69.2%	20	12	60.0%	8	7	87.5%	1	6	2.3	-8	4	38	72.3%
3/13	POR	L 124-114	36	19	7	3	0	1	4	0	0	0.0%	17	7	41.2%	17	7	41.2%	7	5	71.4%	1	6	0.8	-4	4	10	47.3%
3/11	NYK	L 134-117	37	10	2	5	1	0	1	1	1	100.0%	4	3	75.0%	5	4	80.0%	2	1	50.0%	0	2	5.0	-14	1	15	85.0%
3/9	GSW	W 119-116	43	12	3	7	1	0	5	4	0	0.0%	8	5	62.5%	12	5	41.7%	2	2	100.0%	1	2	1.4	+1	2	10	46.6%
3/7	MIL	L 113-99	37	13	11	2	0	2	1	5	1	20.0%	7	3	42.9%	12	4	33.3%	4	4	100.0%	4	7	2.0	-21	0	21	47.2%
3/5	WAS	W 122-112	35	13	3	7	0	2	2	2	1	50.0%	4	4	100.0%	6	5	83.3%	2	2	100.0%	2	1	3.5	+9	4	19	94.5%
3/4	PHI	L 106-102	28	9	6	3	1	0	0	4	1	25.0%	2	2	100.0%	6	3	50.0%	2	2	100.0%	1	5	0.0	+15	1	17	65.4%
3/2	DEN	L 128-125	11	3	1	1	0	1	1	0	0	0.0%	1	1	100.0%	1	1	100.0%	2	1	50.0%	0	1	1.0	-10	2	3	79.8%
2/28	NOP	L 115-105	20	4	2	2	0	1	0	0	0	0.0%	5	2	40.0%	5	2	40.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	2	0.0	-18	1	5	40.0%
2/26	NOP	L 129-118	30	6	3	1	1	0	0	1	0	0.0%	5	2	40.0%	6	2	33.3%	5	2	40.0%	1	2	0.0	-9	1	4	36.6%
2/23	HOU	L 125-105	14	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0%	3	1	33.3%	3	1	33.3%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0	-16	0	2	33.3%
2/20	MEM	L 123-114	37	5	9	2	1	1	4	3	0	0.0%	6	2	33.3%	9	2	22.2%	2	1	50.0%	3	6	0.5	-3	2	5	25.3%
2/12	POR	L 135-119	24	9	2	3	1	2	4	3	0	0.0%	6	4	66.7%	9	4	44.4%	1	1	100.0%	2	0	0.8	-13	3	4	47.7%
2/11	SAC	W 121-93	25	9	5	2	0	3	0	2	1	50.0%	4	3	75.0%	6	4	66.7%	0	0	0.0%	1	4	0.0	+24	2	15	75.0%
2/9	MIA	W 115-111	18	2	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0.0%	1	1	100.0%	1	1	100.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	1	0.0	-2	2	2	100.0%
2/7	ORL	L 120-117	13	0	2	0	0	1	1	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	2	0.0	-10	3	1	0.0%
2/5	ATL	L 121-119	37	5	4	2	3	1	0	3	0	0.0%	6	2	33.3%	9	2	22.2%	2	1	50.0%	2	2	0.0	-10	2	9	25.3%
2/3	IND	W 131-122	40	14	6	3	0	3	1	0	0	0.0%	8	6	75.0%	8	6	75.0%	2	2	100.0%	2	4	3.0	-3	2	22	78.8%
2/1	TOR	L 107-100	20	10	2	0	0	1	0	1	1	100.0%	4	3	75.0%	5	4	80.0%	2	1	50.0%	1	1	0.0	-1	3	8	85.0%
1/30	BKN	L 109-99	28	6	2	1	1	1	1	0	0	0.0%	6	3	50.0%	6	3	50.0%	0	0	0.0%	1	1	1.0	+6	2	4	50.0%
1/27	LAC	L 115-103	25	11	2	0	0	2	2	2	1	50.0%	5	3	60.0%	7	4	57.1%	2	2	100.0%	2	0	0.0	-17	2	9	69.8%
1/24	MIA	L 147-116	29	5	1	1	3	1	1	1	0	0.0%	4	2	50.0%	5	2	40.0%	2	1	50.0%	0	1	1.0	-26	2	4	42.5%
1/22	SAS	L 126-109	22	12	7	3	0	1	1	2	1	50.0%	7	4	57.1%	9	5	55.6%	2	1	50.0%	4	3	3.0	+9	3	14	60.7%
1/20	MIN	W 127-122	28	8	3	1	1	0	1	1	0	0.0%	4	4	100.0%	5	4	80.0%	0	0	0.0%	1	2	1.0	-9	2	9	80.0%
1/19	SAS	L 123-110	23	5	3	0	0	1	1	2	1	50.0%	5	1	20.0%	7	2	28.6%	0	0	0.0%	2	1	0.0	-1	4	4	35.7%
1/17	DAL	L 138-120	27	11	4	2	0	1	3	2	1	50.0%	6	4	66.7%	8	5	62.5%	0	0	0.0%	1	3	0.7	-20	1	11	68.8%
1/15	DAL	L 144-122	31	13	6	0	0	1	1	2	1	50.0%	10	5	50.0%	12	6	50.0%	0	0	0.0%	1	5	0.0	-5	2	9	54.2%
1/14	CHI	L 128-126	31	6	7	2	2	0	0	1	0	0.0%	5	3	60.0%	6	3	50.0%	2	0	0.0%	1	6	0.0	-2	2	11	43.6%
1/12	CLE	W 123-112	21	8	3	2	0	0	2	5	2	40.0%	2	1	50.0%	7	3	42.9%	0	0	0.0%	1	2	1.0	+7	3	4	57.1%
1/10	CHA	L 150-95	32	15	2	0	0	0	0	3	1	33.3%	6	4	66.7%	9	5	55.6%	5	4	80.0%	1	1	0.0	-60	3	12	67.0%
1/8	DAL	W 116-114	22	8	3	4	0	2	0	1	0	0.0%	4	4	100.0%	5	4	80.0%	0	0	0.0%	1	2	0.0	+2	1	15	80.0%
1/7	OKC	L 129-125	13	5	3	0	2	1	0	2	1	50.0%	2	1	50.0%	4	2	50.0%	0	0	0.0%	1	2	0.0	-13	3	5	62.5%
1/5	POR	L 137-117	20	8	2	1	0	1	0	2	0	0.0%	7	4	57.1%	9	4	44.4%	0	0	0.0%	1	1	0.0	+3	1	3	44.4%
1/3	GSW	L 123-114	13	6	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0%	4	3	75.0%	4	3	75.0%	0	0	0.0%	2	1	0.0	-1	2	6	75.0%
1/1	LAC	L 118-101	26	18	0	0	1	0	0	5	2	40.0%	5	4	80.0%	10	6	60.0%	5	4	80.0%	0	0	0.0	-10	2	16	73.8%
12/30	BOS	L 129-119	13	2	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0.0%	2	0	0.0%	3	0	0.0%	2	2	100.0%	0	0	0.0	-17	1	2	25.8%
12/27	SAS	W 127-114	19	8	6	1	0	1	0	2	0	0.0%	6	4	66.7%	8	4	50.0%	1	0	0.0%	2	4	0.0	+10	1	10	47.4%
12/23	MEM	L 137-128	8	4	2	0	0	0	0	2	0	0.0%	3	2	66.7%	5	2	40.0%	0	0	0.0%	2	0	0.0	-4	0	3	40.0%
12/22	DEN	L 135-112	8	0	1	1	1	0	1	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	1	1.0	-1	0	2	0.0%
12/20	ORL	L 128-127	12	0	2	2	0	0	0	2	0	0.0%	2	0	0.0%	4	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	2	0.0	-5	0	0	0.0%
12/15	DAL	W 140-133	22	11	1	2	0	0	0	3	1	33.3%	6	4	66.7%	9	5	55.6%	1	0	0.0%	1	0	0.0	+15	3	8	58.3%
12/7	OKC	L 131-101	8	4	2	0	0	0	0	1	0	0.0%	3	2	66.7%	4	2	50.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	2	0.0	+10	0	3	50.0%
12/4	BKN	W 123-110	8	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0	-1	2	3	0.0%
11/23	LAL	L 108-106	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0.0%	1	0	0.0%	2	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0	-9	1	4	0.0%
11/21	OKC	L 144-112	19	0	2	2	0	0	1	3	0	0.0%	1	0	0.0%	4	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	1	1	2.0	-33	2	3	0.0%
11/18	LAL	L 140-126	20	4	0	0	1	1	0	3	0	0.0%	2	2	100.0%	5	2	40.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0	-14	1	3	40.0%
11/16	CHI	W 150-147	18	0	2	0	0	0	0	2	0	0.0%	2	0	0.0%	4	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	1	1	0.0	+4	3	7	0.0%
11/13	ATL	L 132-122	12	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0.0%	2	1	50.0%	3	1	33.3%	1	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0	+1	0	1	29.1%
11/11	IND	W 152-128	18	2	1	2	0	1	0	2	0	0.0%	2	1	50.0%	4	1	25.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	1	0.0	+14	3	1	25.0%
11/7	MIN	L 137-97	9	5	1	0	0	1	0	2	0	0.0%	4	2	50.0%	6	2	33.3%	2	1	50.0%	0	1	0.0	-3	1	1	36.3%
11/2	CHA	L 126-103	9	0	2	0	1	0	1	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	1	1	0.0	+2	0	3	0.0%
10/31	PHX	L 118-96	14	8	1	0	0	0	0	4	2	50.0%	2	1	50.0%	6	3	50.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	1	0.0	-8	1	5	66.7%
10/29	POR	L 136-134	11	4	1	2	0	0	2	0	0	0.0%	2	2	100.0%	2	2	100.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	1	1.0	+15	5	0	100.0%
10/22	LAC	W 129-108	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0	0	0.0	-1	0	0	0.0%
Regular Season Totals			24.1	8.7	3.0	2.0	0.4	0.7	1.1	2.0	0.4	21.7%	5.5	3.1	56.2%	7.5	3.5	47.2%	1.7	1.2	69.6%	0.9	2.0	1.8	-383	1.8	10.4	52.7%

Cody Williams: Breaking News

Williams registered 14 points (5-15 FG, 0-2 3Pt, 4-4 FT), three rebounds, six assists and two steals across 39 minutes during Sunday's 131-107 loss to the Lakers. Williams was one of several Utah players who experienced growth as the season went on, though his improvements after the All-Star break were noticeable. Williams averaged 8.8 points, 3.0 rebounds and 2.0 assists per game in his sophomore year in the NBA, but when considering only the games after the All-Star break, the former Colorado standout averaged 13.6 points, 4.0 rebounds and 3.9 assists per contest. There was marked progress for Williams throughout the season after a difficult rookie season in 2024-25.

Williams had 14 points (6-16 FG, 2-6 3Pt, 0-2 FT), three rebounds and five assists in 34 minutes during Friday's 147-101 victory over the Grizzlies. Williams didn't have a horrible showing Friday. However, he still had trouble finding the bottom of the net, which has been a recurring theme of late. With only one more game left on the regular-season schedule for Utah, Williams will presumably remain in the starting lineup in Sunday's meeting with the Lakers, assuming Isaiah Collier (hamstring) and Keyonte George (hamstring) remain on the shelf.

Williams ended with 27 points (10-16 FG, 0-2 3Pt, 7-10 FT), 11 rebounds and four assists across 38 minutes during Friday's 140-106 loss to the Rockets. It took him nearly two full seasons in the NBA, but Williams is finally showing the potential that made him the 10th overall pick in the 2024 NBA Draft. The former Colorado standout remains a bit inconsistent, but he's scored at least 24 points in four of his last six games and has posted double-digit points in 12 of his 17 appearances since the beginning of March. Williams is undoubtedly ending the season on the most prolific stretch of his young career.